No.
USA = 8
Europe = 0. It's mainly a European failure. It's a pity.... It's sad.
And in some country, as for Rafale and EF, there was no competition (ex : Egypt for Rafale, Koweit for EF, Israel for F35). So is your 8 real ?
Well the reason why Rafale had no exports for almost a decade or more was because people seem to think buying fighter jets is merely a competition based on merit. While flight characteristics and technology are important purchasing a certain type where often billions are spent, it is almost always a political deal. Egypt, Qatar, India buying the Rafale was exactly a poltical success.
http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/belgium-f-35-joint-strike-fighter-aircraft
All 4.5 gen aircraft be it Rafale, EF, SH Block, MKI, F-16 Block 60+, Mig-35, Su-35, Gripen NG etc all have their advantages and disadvantages. In the end any one of these can prevail over the other in a BVR, WVR, dogfight scenario based on pilot skill, tactics and creativity.
F-35 brings a few more goodies but still, it's a tool only as effective as the user. That said, Belgium going the F-35 is no brainer. The flyaway price and service cost for 5-10 years is still very good, deliveries begin 2023+
http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/belgium-f-35-joint-strike-fighter-aircraft
The F-35 once it arrives will deploy all US weapons in Belgian inventory, Belgium had plenty of experience assembling the F-16s and those old relationships are still active for fleet maintenance. The current 31st Tiger F-16 SQD at Kliene Brogel have a nuke attack role using the B-61 bomb which will begin flight certification on the F-35 so they will this ability as well. Belgium doesn't pay it's 2% of GDP fair share to NATO and with Trump making it squeaky clear that these countries need up their funding, what better way to please the Trumpster than by handing this lucrative contract to Lockheed.