F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

cobra commando

Tharki regiment
New Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
11,117
Likes
14,550
Country flag
First F-35 Guided Weapon Test

First F-35 Guided Weapon Test - YouTube


An F-35 Lightning II employs a Guided Bomb Unit-12 (GBU-12) Paveway II laser-guided weapon from the internal weapons bay against a fixed ground tank test target Oct. 29, at a test range at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. The F-35's Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS) enabled the pilot to identify, track, designate and deliver the GBU-12 on target.


https://www.f35.com/news/detail/f-3...irst-guided-weapon-delivery-against-ground-ta
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
Old news. 2005.
Navy favours F-35 fighters, but not in F-18 : Naval Chief

Navy favours F-35 fighters, but not in F-18 : Naval Chief

Kolkata, Jul 11 (PTI) Indian Navy is willing to procure F-35 advanced fighters from US, but it is not interested in F-18 fighter planes as they are not "compatible" with the aircraft carriers of the naval force, Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Arun Prakash said here today.
"Yes. Given an offer, we will be much interested in having the F-35 fighters," Admiral Prakash told reporters when asked if the Navy would be willing to procure the advanced fighters from the US.

He was speaking to reporters after the commissioning of warship INS Beas at the Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers Ltd. Admiral Prakash said that the F-18 aircraft, being offered by the US to Indian armed forces, would not be relevant for the Navy. "F-18 is a carrier-borne aircraft, but needs steam catapult (for take-off). It is not compatible to ski-jump and therefore, not suitable for our type of aircraft carriers," he said. On the other hand the F-35 aircraft were of the ski-jump type and would be suitable for the Navy's aircraft carriers, he explained.

The Navy was also looking for acquisition of "reconnoisseur aircraft but not of AWACS type," Admiral Prakash said, but hastened to add that plans were underway to replace the Sea Harrier fighter aircraft with MiG 29-K and light combat aircraft (LCA). "We have one squadron of fighter aircraft Sea Harrier with INS Virat, but it will be replaced by Mig 29-K or LCA," he said.

About the proposal for producing indigenously built submarines, Admiral Prakash said "we have submitted a proposal to the government for building submarines of the Scorpene design, which is of French origin." Once the proposal is cleared six submarines would be produced at the Mazagon dock and the first of the lot would be rolled out six years after the government nod, he said.

Hailing the capability of Indian shipyards in producing world-class warships, destroyers, patrol vessels, he said "work is also underway to produce indigenous Aircraft Carrier in the Cochin Shipyard." The Naval Chief, however, urged the domestic shipyards, which has so far produced 80 ships for the Navy, to improve productivity given the requirements of the force. "It is not a warning, but a request that our shipyards accelerate the pace of production. While we are deeply committed to our PSUs, we just cannot allow force levels to decline. Therefore, if left with no alternative, we shall have to import warships to make up our force levels." Admiral Prakash also stressed on "thinking seriously of mobilising private sector in support of the national ship-building effort.
 

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,558
Country flag
F-35B launches air-to-air missile in test
Jon Hemmerdinger

Lockheed Martin's F-35A Joint Strike Fighter has conducted its first live-fire test of an air-to-air missile, the company reports.

An aircraft piloted by Air Force Capt. Logan Lamping launched an AIM-120 advance medium range air-to-air missile (AMRAAM) against an aerial drone while flying in a military test range off the California coast, says Lockheed in a media release.



The drone was identified and targeted using mission systems sensors and the target's "track" information was passed to the radar-seeking missile, say Lockheed.

The weapon launched from the aircraft's internal weapons bay, acquired the target and flew an "intercept flight profile," says Lockheed.

Moments before impact the missile received a self-destruct signal, preserving the drone, says Lockheed.



"This successful missile launch marks the first live-fire weapons test and is an initial demonstration of the air-to-air combat capability the F-35 will bring to the US military and our international partners," says Charlie Wagner, weapons team lead for the F-35 Joint Program Office, in the release. "This test represents the culmination of many years of careful planning by combined government and contractor teams."

The missile test comes the day after an F-35B, the short takeoff and vertical landing variant of the fighter, successfully tested an air-to-ground laser-guided bomb.
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/10/29/uk-korea-fighter-idUKBRE99S0HP20131029

Buy stealth: South Korea set to go with F-35 fighters - sources

(Reuters) - A task force formed by South Korea's defence ministry to re-examine its fighter jet requirements is likely to reaffirm the need for a stealthy fifth generation fighter, giving a boost to Lockheed Martin Corp's (LMT.N) F-35 programme, according to several industry sources familiar with the tender.

The task force was formed last month after a separate committee rejected the Defense Acquisition Program Administration's recommendation to buy the Boeing (BA.N) F-15, which was the only fighter among the three in the tender to fall within Seoul's budget.

The F-35 scored the highest in a technical evaluation, according to the sources, and is believed to be favoured by senior government and air force officials.

After opposition from several high-profile South Koreans, including a handful of ex-Air Force chiefs, to the selection of the F-15, the committee led by South Korea's defence minister decided that it would re-examine the terms of the tender.

The task force, including representatives of the South Korean Joints Chiefs of Staff and senior Air Force officials, is now taking another look at South Korea's requirements.

Within the next few weeks, it is expected to reaffirm that South Korea needs a fighter with the stealth capabilities of the F-35, said a source with knowledge of the process. The sources asked not be named because they were not authorised to speak to the media.

With the South Korean government unlikely to increase the budget, the task force is expected to recommend that the country prioritise aircraft capability and use the same budget to buy fewer aircraft, one of the sources, with knowledge of the South Korean government's considerations, said.

Seoul originally planned to buy 60 fighters, but that could come down to around 40, with options for more, according to a second industry source.

The task force is also likely recommend that there is no need to assess the capability of the aircraft again, given that the results of DAPA's two-year evaluation are still valid, according to one of the sources.

A final contract could be signed by the third quarter of 2014 after the negotiations over the offset requirements, one source said. South Korea has not asked for an assembly line to be built in the country, and instead wants the winner of the competition to help with the development of its KF-X light fighter programme.

That will allow South Korea to get initial delivery of the F-35 by its original target of 2017 if it is chosen, given that the U.S. government and Lockheed need a three-year lead time from orders to the first deliveries.

KEEPING UP WITH ITS NEIGHBOURS

South Korea's shift toward the F-35 has also been influenced by Japan's decision to order the stealth fighter, and China's development of indigenous stealth fighters. There are concerns within South Korea that not acquiring a stealth fighter would result in a major capability gap vis-a-vis its neighbours.

A spokesman for South Korea's defense ministry said the only matter decided was that Seoul would buy a next generation fighter jet - the number of jets, the model and the total cost had not been determined.

Boeing has said that while it was disappointed with the delay, it "looks forward to working with the South Korean government" to meet its requirements.

David Scott, Lockheed Martin's director for F-35 International Customer Engagement, said on the sidelines of a defence industry event in Seoul this week that there were several possible paths forward for South Korea, which included either cutting the number of aircraft ordered or increasing the budget to accommodate all contenders.

"We don't know, nor have we ever been officially informed, of any path forward," he added.

Europe's Eurofighter also plans to bid again for the order, but the head of Europe's EADS (EAD.PA) acknowledged last month that the company faced a tough battle against its U.S. rivals.
This was oh-so expected. It looks like Korea will be buying a squadron of upgraded F-15s too, while not 100%, it looks like things are headed that way anyway.

Poor EADS. They should have done a Dassault and fled.
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
The F-35 Fighter Jet Program Has Precisely 719 Problems - Mark Micheli - The Atlantic

The F-35 Fighter Jet Program Has Precisely 719 Problems

The beleaguered F-35 program has yet another problem on its hands. Actually, make that 719 problems.

A recent report from the Pentagon's internal watchdog reveals that the next gen fighter jet is plagued with hundreds of issues. The Defense Department's Inspector General conducted a series of quality assurance assessments that found the Joint Program Office and Defense Contract Management Agency performed "inadequate oversight," failing to adhere to widely adopted quality management protocols while losing control of contractors that have already sunk an estimated$400 billion taxpayer dollars into what is the most expensive weapons system ever developed by the U.S. government.

The IG's 126-page report concluded that prime contractor Lockheed Martin and its subcontractors Northrop Grumman, BAE Systems, L-3 Display Systems, Honeywell Aerospace and United Technologies Corporation "did not follow disciplined AS9100 Quality Management System practices," citing 363 findings, which documented 719 issues that could "adversely affect aircraft performance, reliability, maintainability, and ultimately cost."

Among the numerous oversight shortcomings, the IG found that JPO failed to:

Ensure that Lockheed Martin and its subcontractors were applying rigor to design, manufacturing, and quality assurance processes.
Flow down critical safety item requirements.
Ensure that Lockheed Martin flowed down quality assurance and technical requirements to subcontractors.
Establish an effective quality assurance organization.
Ensure that the Defense Contract Management Agency perform adequate quality assurance oversight.
In addition, the Defense Contract Management Agency did not sufficiently perform Government quality assurance oversight of F-35 contractors.
In a statement received by Defense News, F-35 JPO spokesman Joe DellaVedova said the report was "thorough, professional, well-documented and useful to the F-35 Enterprise." He also said many of the issues in the report had been previously documented and addressed, noting that the IG conducted the report between Feb. 2012 and July 2013. Lockheed Martin told ABC News that the IG's report is "based on data that's more than 16 months old and [a] majority of the Corrective Action Requests identified have been closed."
http://www.dodig.mil/pubs/documents/DODIG-2013-140.pdf
 

Defcon 1

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
2,195
Likes
1,842
Country flag

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
IOC date is 2018 and SK will get it by 2017? Seems that lm will fix them up with some of the earliest produced aircraft which may not be upto the IOC standard.
Yeah. They can get the F-35 in batches if they want as some of the others are. Probably get 2 or more with pre-IOC standards.
 

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,558
Country flag
South Korea to Obtain 40 F-35As
Greg Waldron
Flightglobal
November 21, 2013



South Korea will obtain 40 Lockheed Martin F-35A fighters under its F-X III requirement.

A report by state news agency Yonhap quotes the country's Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) as saying that Seoul will obtain 40 F-35s starting in 2018, with an option to buy 20 more aircraft.

The deal will be conducted through the US government's Foreign Military Sales mechanism.

"The F-35A will be used as a strategic weapon to gain a competitive edge and defeat the enemy in the early stage of war," Yonhap quotes the JCS as saying. "The South Korean military will also use the aircraft to effectively deal with provocations."

Deliveries will begin in 2018, says Yonhap.

"We will continue to work closely with the US government to meet the Republic of Korea Air Force's fighter requirements," says Lockheed. "we greatly appreciate that the Republic of Korea is pursuing a fifth-generation solution to meet their demanding security needs." The company confirms that is can supply aircraft in time to meet Seoul's 2018 objective, and in the F-35's Block 3F software configuration.

Seoul will also obtain an additional 20 fighter aircraft of unspecified type, but the timeframe and details of this acquisition are not clear.

This additional requirement would appear to leave room for Boeing and Eurofighter, which pitched the F-15 Silent Eagle and Typhoon in the original 60 aircraft F-X III competition, to make a significant sale in South Korea.



At a recent defence exhibition in South Korea, Boeing dropped its F-15SE proposal in favour of an aircraft it dubs the "Advanced F-15" (above). Eurofighter continued pitching the Typhoon.



An industry source familiar with South Korean defence requirements says today's F-35A announcement stems from a 30-man team recently established by the air force to push its case with the country's JCS, which has ultimate authority over force improvement decisions.

The JCS will submit this recommendation to the Defence Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA), which will negotiate the final contract. The air force team will also play a role in the acquisition of South Korea's indigenous KFX fighter and a four-aircraft tanker requirement.

This should have the effect of reducing DAPA's say over platform capabilities and relegate it to a contract negotiation role.

The original F-X III requirement called for Seoul to obtain 60 new fighters. The only aircraft to come in under the DAPA's budget of won (W) 8.3 trillion ($7.7 billion) was Boeing's proposed F-15SE, an upgraded version of the venerable type with low observable features and other improvements.

In September, however, Seoul decided to re-tender the competition following the air force's reiteration that it wants a stealth aircraft to fill the requirement, and a public relations backlash in South Korean media against the selection of the F-15SE.


South Korea to obtain 40 F-35As
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
I am not sure if this was ever posted, but it lists the price of the F-35s that were contracted for in September this year.

F-35 Deal Targets Unit Cost Below $100 Million
The Pentagon and Lockheed Martin have agreed to a handshake deal for the latest two lots of F-35 airframes, and based on cost projections the program for the first time is targeting a unit price under $100 million, excluding engines and retrofits.

The deal covers 36 aircraft in low-rate, initial production (LRIP) lot 6 and another 35 in LRIP 7. Mandatory cuts handed down by sequestration in the fiscal 2013 budget did not ultimately affect the number of aircraft in LRIP 6, as once thought.

The total contract price and per-unit price figures will not be released until the contract is signed, according to Michael Rein, a Lockheed Martin spokesman.

However, the company says that unit cost of each variant will be reduced by about 4% lot over lot. Based on the pricing targets for LRIP 5, which was inked late last year — $105 million for the F-35A, $113 million for the F-35B and $125 million for F-35C — the per-unit targets can be projected for these new LRIP 6 and 7 jets.

The F-35A variant, designed for conventional takeoff and landing (and the version with greatest appeal to international partners) is projected to cost $100.8 million in LRIP 6 and $96.8 million in LRIP 7. This is the first time since the program began production that the projected unit cost will be under $100 million.

The F-35B, optimized for short takeoff and vertical landing, is expected to cost $108.5 million in LRIP 6 and $104.2 million in LRIP 7.

Finally, the F-35C, designed with a larger wing for aircraft carrier operations, is expected to cost $120 million in LRIP 6 and another $115.2 million in LRIP 7.

These prices do not include the cost of engines; the government contracts separately with Pratt & Whitney to purchase the F135. Pratt & Whitney will not release its unit cost, but the Pentagon said that in LRIP 3, each F-35A engine cost roughly $16 million and each F-35B engine cost about $38 million. Pratt and the Pentagon remain in contract negotiations for engines for LRIP 6, says company spokesman Matthew Bates.

These estimates also exclude the cost of retrofitting the aircraft that have been produced with upgrades required as a result of discoveries in flight testing that occurred in parallel with early manufacturing work.

Based on a May report, the Pentagon estimates that each of its aircraft in LRIP 6 and 7 would require another $7.4 million for retrofits. In LRIP 6-7, the government and company have agreed to split equally the cost of those known retrofits at the time of contract signature. Any new problems that crop up in flight trials will require full payment by the government, according to a company statement.

Based on what is known of engine cost, retrofit estimates and the target-unit cost projections, an F-35A in LRIP 6 would cost the U.S. government a total of roughly $120.5 million and $116.5 million in LRIP 7.

Likewise, using these estimates, the F-35B is estimated at $150.2 million in LRIP 6 and $145.9 million in LRIP 7. These calculations include only half of the retrofit estimate provided by the Pentagon to Congress in May because the company would be required to pay for the other half.

LRIPs 6-7 will be the first contract for which Lockheed Martin assumes all responsibility for exceeding the target cost of the air vehicles, according to Rein.

International customers would not be required to pay the same retrofit costs as the U.S. government, as the Pentagon is picking up the nonrecurring engineering to develop the fixes.

LRIP 6 includes 18 F-35As for the U.S. Air Force; six F-35Bs for the Marine Corps and seven F-35Cs for the Navy. It also includes three F-35As for Italy and 2 for Australia.

LRIP 7 includes 19 F-35As for the U.S. Air Force; six F-35Bs for the Marine Corps and four F-35Cs for the U.S. Navy. It also includes another 3 F-35As for Italy, two F-35As for Norway and one F-35B for the United Kingdom.

Air Force Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, F-35 program executive officer, said last winter he expected to stabilize the F-35A unit price at $80-90 million at full-rate production, when no retrofits should be required.
The parts in red are relevant to India.

The LRIP unit costs of the F-35s are actually significantly lower than what the critics claim. This means the serial production costs will be much lower than the above costs for obvious reasons.
 

lookieloo

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
468
Likes
264
I am not sure if this was ever posted, but it lists the price of the F-35s that were contracted for in September this year.

F-35 Deal Targets Unit Cost Below $100 Million


The parts in red are relevant to India.

The LRIP unit costs of the F-35s are actually significantly lower than what the critics claim. This means the serial production costs will be much lower than the above costs for obvious reasons.
Bare in mind that a good-many variables exist in determining JSF costs. Examples include: including/excluding engine-costs, including/excluding development-costs, including/excluding inflation-metrics, and including/excluding maintenance/upgrade/modification costs. This leaves a great deal of room for obfuscation amongst critics and supporters alike. The LRIP numbers mentioned by Ms. Butler above clearly exclude engine-costs (which are dropping as well), but she fails to mention whether Gen. Bogdan's final estimate does the same (probably not) or what year-dollars he's using.

Of course, such murky figures are nothing new. The F-22's price "fluctuates" between $120 million and $700 million depending on who's writing and what argument they're trying to make. :rolleyes:
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
Bare in mind that a good-many variables exist in determining JSF costs. Examples include: including/excluding engine-costs, including/excluding development-costs, including/excluding inflation-metrics, and including/excluding maintenance/upgrade/modification costs. The LRIP numbers mentioned by Ms. Butler above clearly exclude engine-costs (which are dropping as well),
The costs calculated in the article have to do with fly away costs of the F-35. Add $16 Million or $38 Million depending on the version to include engine costs. The article does indicate the prices are without engine costs.

So, the latest figure for LRIP 7 F-35C should cost not more than $131 Million fly away.

Anyway, what will be more interesting is the cost of LRIP 9 with 6 IOC model F-35C.

but she fails to mention whether Gen. Bogdan's final estimate does the same (probably not) or what year-dollars he's using.
They should have considered year 2012 figures since the LRIP contract was negotiated for and signed at the end of the American 2012 fiscal. Contracts also have inflation clauses added to ensure the final deal will have a cost figure that matched the dollar figure of, say, 10 years ago.

If you look at the price difference between these two lots, without engines,
LRIP 5 cost $4 Billion for 30 aircraft.
http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/feature/133433/f_35-unit-cost-tops-$200m--%3Ci%3E(updated)%3C%C2%A7i%3E.html

LRIP 7 cost $3.9 Billion for 35 aircraft.
https://www.f35.com/news/detail/lrip-6-7-contract-agreements

Meaning unit costs without engines dropped from $133 Million in 5 to $111 Million in 7.
 

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,558
Country flag
Lockheed Touts F-35 Progress, Predicts Competitive Pricing
Jon Hemmerdinger
Flightglobal
December 16, 2013

Lockheed Martin says it has made notable progress on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter programme in 2013, and insists the aircraft's price will be less than earlier-generation fighter aircraft in the coming years.

"We will have an aircraft price in 2019 for a fifth-generation fighter that is less than any fourth-generation fighter in the world," says Lorraine Martin, Lockheed's executive vice president and general manager of the F-35 programme.

Martin, who was referring to the US Air Force's F-35A version of the jet, says efforts to reduce costs should bring the price of the aircraft down to about $85 million by 2019, including engines and full mission systems. That amount would equal $75 million in today's dollars, she adds.



Martin made her comments to reporters 13 December, the same day the company hosted an event in Fort Worth, Texas, to mark production of the 100th F-35.

At the event, which drew several hundred attendees, Lockheed executives insisted the F-35 programme is back on track.

"The F-35 is real, it is here and it is flying," Orlando Carvalho, Lockheed's executive vice president of Aeronautics, tells attendees.

Martin tells reporters F-35s currently cost "under $100 million", and that the price should decline as the US government orders additional aircraft.

"Quantity absolutely matters right now in this programme," she says. "If [the number of orders] doesn't increase, that will dampen out our ability to get costs out."

In 2013 Lockheed submitted a proposal to the US government for an eighth round of "low rate initial production," and the company expects an agreement by early spring 2014, says Martin.

But even at $85 million, its not clear the F-35 would beat competing fighters on price.

On 9 December, Michael Gibbons, Boeing's vice president and programme manager of the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and E/A-18G Growler, told reporters that Super Hornets currently cost $51-$52 million, including engines and weapons systems.

Although Navy orders for F/A-18s currently run only through the current fiscal year 2014, Boeing says it expects additional orders, and the US Navy has said it is keeping open the option to purchase more of the fighters.

Martin and others say Lockheed has made substantial progress on the F-35 in 2013.

"This [year] has really been about maturing the aircraft... and our ability to stand-up operations in the US," she tells reporters. "You can really feel the momentum building on every single dimension of the programme."

For example, the company is "on path" to delivery its target of 36 aircraft in 2013, with 29 aircraft already having been delivered and another four ready to leave the Fort Worth factory, Martin says.

The 100th aircraft will be delivered to Luke Air Force Base in Arizona where US and partner militaries will conduct flight training.

Also in the last year, Lockheed helped train 92 F-35 pilots and 944 aircraft maintainers, and in 2013 the company opened a final assembly and checkout facility —a so-called FACO — at the Cameri air base near Novara, Italy, Martin says.

"The milestones we have set for ourselves over the last three years we are meeting," she adds.

In 2014, Lockheed says it expects to deliver the first aircraft to partner country Australia. Also next year, the company intends to conduct shipboard testing of the US Navy's F-35C version of the aircraft and delivery the first F-35B to the US Marine Corps in Beaufort, South Carolina, says Martin.

The Marine Corps expects to reach initial operational capability with 10 to 16 F-35Bs by December 2015 and the Air Force plans to reach IOC with 12 to 24 F-35As by December 2016, according to a US military report to congressional defense committees in June.

The US Navy expects to be the last service to reach IOC, with a target of no later than February 2019 with 10 F-35Cs.

Lockheed touts F-35 progress, predicts competitive pricing


That would be cheaper than the Rafale...
 
Last edited:

TrueSpirit1

The Nobody
Banned
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
1,575
Likes
1,024
Last edited by a moderator:

Articles

Top