SexyChineseLady
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2016
- Messages
- 5,178
- Likes
- 4,008
WS-18, WS-20 in comparison:
Now revealed,
Engine | Latest Variant | Top Thrust (all variants) | Status |
WS-10 | WS-10C | 155 kN | Production: J-10C, J-11BG, J-15, J-20 |
WS-13 | WS-13E | 100 kN | Production Line ready: JF-17 test, FC-31 prototype,J-35 prototype |
WS-21 | -- | ~100kN | J-35 prototype |
WS-15 | -- | 180 kN | J-20 test; Production: J-20A |
WS-19 | -- | 110 kN | Il-76 flight testbed |
WS-11 | -- | 17 kN | Production: JL-11 (K-8 variant) |
WS-17 | -- | 49 kN | L-15 test completed; Production: JL-10, L-15! |
WS-18 | -- | 120 kN | Production: Y-20, H-6 variants |
WS-20 | -- | 160 kN | Production: Y-20B |
CJ1000 | -- | 196 kN | Il-76 flight testbed; Y-20 flight testbed |
CJ2000 | -- | 340 kN | core successfully ignited |
No official details even less than WS-15. The watchers' concensus is wet thrust at 110kN.@SexyChineseLady
What confident details do you have on WS-19?
After checking all links on 1st page of Google search i found multiple specs -
(Afterburner thrust / engine weight) ratio = 10.
Afterburner thrust = 98 - 124.7 KN / 10,000 - 12,727 Kgf / 22,000 - 28,000 lbf.
Dry weight = 1,000 - 1,272.7 Kg / 2,200 - 2,800 lbs.
Dry thrust = 78.45 KN / 8,005 Kgf / 17,611.2 lbf.
(Dry thrust / weight) ratio = 6.3 - 8.
(Dry thrust / Afterburner) % = 63 - 80 %
(Afterburner / Dry thrust) increase = 25 - 59 %
Bypass ratio = 0.3
Dry thrust fuel usage (g/KN/s) = ??
Afterburner fuel usage (g/KN/s) = ??
Air flow (Kg/s) = ??
Compression ratio = ??
# of fans, compressors & turbines = ??
Turbine inlet temperature = ??
MTBO = ??
Lifespan = ??
.No official details even less than WS-15. The watchers' concensus is wet thrust at 110kN.
124.7 is way too high. WS-13E and WS-21 are tagged at around 100kN so a modest hike to 110kN along with longer life and MTBO seems reasonable.