- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Messages
- 7,029
- Likes
- 8,764
Re: ADA LCA Tejas - IV
you can explain it before advising other forum members to get education from another member.
or
Are you going to keep quiet as per your own statement of,"Ignorance is bliss "and enjoy the wonderland of "all tail less deltas have high sub sonic drag , which reduces their operating range with no proof worth the while" ?
Surely this statement of yours is not English grammatical error.
Mk-1'e empty weight increased due to higher requirements from IAF considering the need for staying up to date in close combat specs and the failure of K-9 to keep up with it. tejas mk-2 will have no problem in that department.
Tejas mk-2 will get the correct proportion of empty weight to optimum SFC of GE 414 INS 6 engine and have a comparable range to all other fighters. as per the following fuel fractions.
and with one more ton of internal fuel it's fuel fraction too will come close to 30 percent of Mirage-2000 , allowing a half a ton weight increase for the lengthier fuselage.
So it will have a comparable combat range to Mirage-2000 perhaps. Hope it is not hobbled by your special theory of "tail less deltas have high sub sonic drag , which reduces their operating range",
You are simply confusing the high trim drag of older plain tailless deltas which are avoided by using canards or LREX or LEVCONS or strakes or cranked delta in almost all of modern day deltas to enable beneficial vortex creation to arrive at higher lift to drag ratio..
Since Mirage-2000 andf f-16 Xl don't get affected by this theory of yours , I hope Tejas too won't get affected by your theory.
Well keeping a long Ignore list saves you from such inconvenient question perhaps.Nice practice.
But what is the point of keeping long Ignore lists
and then logging on as an unregistered user
without giving your name in the User name dialogue box ,
to see what these guys who are on your Ignore list posted in threads.
Really tedious practice for me.
Do you have any chinese power point presentation for your absurd claim ,"tail less deltas have high sub sonic drag , which reduces their operating range"? Mirage-2000 and F-16 XL seems to defy your theory here . Is Mirage-2000 not a tail less delta? How does it's range not getting affected by your claim of "tail less deltas have high sub sonic drag , which reduces their operating range".quite strange...I really don't understand you would show off such basic concept here, I thought you needn't push such so called' popularization of science' to me...actually some other members might need your so 'profound' knowledge more ...
what I did were:
1. correct the FC-1/JF17 internal Fuel weight ratio.
2. clarify the so called JF17's "a phenomenal claimed range of 3000 km"---it's a ferry range data, and it's official and possible.
3. also give a concept in China Military Standard of Airplane design ---airplane's Basic range. ...JF17 is designed under China's standard and evaluation system, different country has different concept and standard, I thought it might be helpful to open your mind...use your "@" to them please...LOL
actualy this screenshot of the PPT just explained these three concepts
-------------------
to some member on my ignoring list(maybe on many other's list as well...LOL), I do beg you put me on your ignoring list as well and enjoy your own wonderland...
I accept some decent BR member's suggest , I carefully chose a word' ignoring' not 'ignorance', I thought there was much difference...LOL...sorry for my poor English expression
you can explain it before advising other forum members to get education from another member.
or
Are you going to keep quiet as per your own statement of,"Ignorance is bliss "and enjoy the wonderland of "all tail less deltas have high sub sonic drag , which reduces their operating range with no proof worth the while" ?
Surely this statement of yours is not English grammatical error.
Mk-1'e empty weight increased due to higher requirements from IAF considering the need for staying up to date in close combat specs and the failure of K-9 to keep up with it. tejas mk-2 will have no problem in that department.
Tejas mk-2 will get the correct proportion of empty weight to optimum SFC of GE 414 INS 6 engine and have a comparable range to all other fighters. as per the following fuel fractions.
Since tejas mk-2's empty weight will be tailored to the optimum SFC of GE -414 IN S 6 ,ejas:25%
EFT: 31%
F22: 29%
JF17:25%
Gripen C:3000*0.8/8500=28.23
F16 C: 3175/12000=26.4
Rafale: 4700/14900=31.5%
Mirage-2000 = 30%
and with one more ton of internal fuel it's fuel fraction too will come close to 30 percent of Mirage-2000 , allowing a half a ton weight increase for the lengthier fuselage.
So it will have a comparable combat range to Mirage-2000 perhaps. Hope it is not hobbled by your special theory of "tail less deltas have high sub sonic drag , which reduces their operating range",
You are simply confusing the high trim drag of older plain tailless deltas which are avoided by using canards or LREX or LEVCONS or strakes or cranked delta in almost all of modern day deltas to enable beneficial vortex creation to arrive at higher lift to drag ratio..
Since Mirage-2000 andf f-16 Xl don't get affected by this theory of yours , I hope Tejas too won't get affected by your theory.
Well keeping a long Ignore list saves you from such inconvenient question perhaps.Nice practice.
But what is the point of keeping long Ignore lists
and then logging on as an unregistered user
without giving your name in the User name dialogue box ,
to see what these guys who are on your Ignore list posted in threads.
Really tedious practice for me.
Last edited: