What are you trying to say. Is it a Trojan horse. Price had no role. Be more specific.
I have no visibility into the contract and no insight into the intentions of either the buyer or seller.
Quotes:
"T-Loramids consists of radar, launcher and intercept missiles. The system has been designed to counter both enemy aircraft and missiles. Turkey has no long-range air-defense systems.
CPMEIC said it will co-produce the system with Turkish prime and subcontractors. But diplomats and analysts warn that Turkey may not be allowed to integrate the Chinese-Turkish system into its mostly NATO-owned early warning assets""
Air-defense systems are usually combined into an integrated network composed of the following elements:
--Sensors (e.g. radars - ground-, air-, ship-based; satellites)
--Communication links (in an offensive air control campaign, these would be wireless; in a defensive campaign, these would predominantly be deeply buried fiber optic cables)
--Command, Control, and Computer Nodes (e.g. command bunkers, server farms/data centers, airborne command posts)
--Launchers (everything from a teenager with a SA-18 to the SM-3 and S-400; also includes aircraft tasked with CAP; this is where the Chinese system would fit)
--Facilities, Repair, Supply, and Logistics (fuel tanks, runways, warehouses with missiles)
How many of these elements will the T-Loramids/HQ-9 have to interact with to function at maximum efficiency? Every element that interfaces with the Chinese system will need project integration work, which means China has a potential to learn about it. NATO may gain deep insight into the HQ-9, but China will be able to peek into a broad swathe of NATO systems in return. It's a question of depth vs breadth.