We are going to have an ICBM sooner or later, but payload capacity is changed Agni-III is an ICBM, Govt. of India has given already go ahead for MIRV capable Agni-V. A capability of India's H-Bomb,whether we have Megaton capacity or not , may have in this link:India doesnt even have ICBM, what are we even talking about here
I never said China was. I said that according to all credible sources, China had stopped production of fissile material in the mid-90s, as part of an unofficial understanding among the P-5.LOL. China is not a member of the fissile material cut-off treaty.
Yes, and the reason for that is that megaton weapons are not needed anymore. In the past megaton bombs were developed because the main means of delivery was a bomber aircraft. As missile accuracy improved, they took on the role of being the primary bomb delivery platforms. Since the greater the yield, the greater the weight, it was thought to be more appropriate to use multiple kiloton bombs with combined yields in the megaton range if need be, in MIRV configuration for better survivability against missile shields.India can't even make a megaton bomb. Everything is in the dozens of kilotons. China has been playing with multimegaton bomb since the 80's. India has what like two nuclear tests. China has dozens.
You're ignorant. Indian nukes (boosted fission and thermonuclear) were made so that they could be daisy chained in a configuration that could go upto 200 kT. Please look around the forum, I myself posted an interview with the Chairman of India's Atomic Energy Commission, who revealed this.These days, China fields MIRVed warheads with yields in the half-megaton range, equivalent to what USA and Russia fields. India takes up an entire strategic missile with a 20 kiloton or so weapon.
India never had to fight a Cold War enemy located thousands of miles away to warrant the production of ICBMs. But if she did, how long do you think it would take to convert the India's spacecraft launch vehicles into BMs?Moron or not, but Chinese nuclear capabilities should be compared to US and Russia, not India. With all due respect, India doesnt even have ICBM, what are we even talking about here?
Agni-III with 3.5K km range is not an ICBM. And its not even fielded. Seriously. Can we cut out the penis measurement contest? Mythical Agni-III vs deployed DF-31A is not what you should be comparing.We are going to have an ICBM sooner or later, but payload capacity is changed Agni-III is an ICBM, Govt. of India has given already go ahead for MIRV capable Agni-V. A capability of India's H-Bomb,whether we have Megaton capacity or not , may have in this link:
Cover Story: Is India's H-Bomb a Dud? Pg 2
Regards
A WHOLE 200kt? Welcome to 1950s. Make yourself at home.You're ignorant. Indian nukes (boosted fission and thermonuclear) were made so that they could be daisy chained in a configuration that could go upto 200 kT. Please look around the forum, I myself posted an interview with the Chairman of India's Atomic Energy Commission, who revealed this.
About 5-7 years.India never had to fight a Cold War enemy located thousands of miles away to warrant the production of ICBMs. But if she did, how long do you think it would take to convert the India's spacecraft launch vehicles into BMs?
when india can lunch satalites , what so big in ICBM..Agni-III with 3.5K km range is not an ICBM. And its not even fielded. Seriously. Can we cut out the penis measurement contest? Mythical Agni-III vs deployed DF-31A is not what you should be comparing.
What I have written is that Agni-III is an ICBM when payload weight is changed, it is not fielded now but going to be inducted after its test again after June end this year, and I am not in any measurement contest.Please kindly check your language. Agni-III is not mythical.Agni-III with 3.5K km range is not an ICBM. And its not even fielded. Seriously. Can we cut out the penis measurement contest? Mythical Agni-III vs deployed DF-31A is not what you should be comparing.
the agni3 has been successfully tested multiple times.........and yes by reducing the payload,the range can increased upto 5000-6000kms.........and reducing payload is not a big thing,as even then it can be quite effective.........btw,india's gonna test the mirv capable agni5 within a year with a announced range of >5000kmAgni-III with 3.5K km range is not an ICBM. And its not even fielded. Seriously. Can we cut out the penis measurement contest? Mythical Agni-III vs deployed DF-31A is not what you should be comparing.
Now go back and read the rest of my post.A WHOLE 200kt? Welcome to 1950s. Make yourself at home.
Exactly. But there's no reason to develop ICBMs because we don't foresee a war with the US anytime soon. Or at least that's the argument that is given by many strategic analysts in India.About 5-7 years.
Penis is a medical term. Relax. You know what I mean.What I have written is that Agni-III is an ICBM when payload weight is changed, it is not fielded now but going to be inducted after its test again after June end this year, and I am not in any measurement contest.Please kindly check your language. Agni-III is not mythical.
Regards
Source pleasethe agni3 has been successfully tested multiple times.........and yes by reducing the payload,the range can increased upto 5000-6000kms.........and reducing payload is not a big thing,as even then it can be quite effective.........btw,india's gonna test the mirv capable agni5 within a year with a announced range of >5000km
Nope. It would take around 10, if we start now. We haven't deployed our own Cryogenic engines.About 5-7 years.
Mate. 5*200kt is not possible for India as of now. We still have a long ways to go before we can lift atleast 4 to 5 tons payload before we can achieve parity.Now go back and read the rest of my post.
5x200 kT MIRV = 1MT, no? Good enough, some might say. But then again, some others who made the Tsar Bomba might disagree.
thnx buddy,i was bout to post the same thing....
I don't think you need cryogenic engines for Ballistic Missiles. If you did, then we couldn't even have developed Prithvi.Nope. It would take around 10, if we start now. We haven't deployed our own Cryogenic engines.
5x200=1MT. The 1MT doesn't refer to payload weight, but to explosive power. It refers to a nuke which has the explosive power of 1000000 tons of TNT.Mate. 5*200kt is not possible for India as of now. We still have a long ways to go before we can lift atleast 4 to 5 tons payload before we can achieve parity.
Comparing India's fledgling missile program to US, Russia and China is not possible. The Chinese program is more mature.
Thanks, dude. BR isnt the best source, but its something. We'll wait for the test.
I have not compared DF-31 with Agni-III anywhere, please, read my post.Mythical Agni-III vs deployed DF-31A is not what you should be comparing.
Satish , I am not comparing Agni- III missile with DF-31A, in any of post it will not be found that I went for comparing both of these missile.Well even I am against comparison of yet to be deployed Agni 3 to the already deployed DF-31A missile.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
China's real economy is better than ever | China | 2 | ||
B | China's real TOP GUN!!! Best in the business. | China | 6 | |
India, China, US: Which is the real Super Economy? | Economy & Infrastructure | 1 | ||
China's "Real" GDP Growth Could Be As Low As 3.8% | China | 7 |