1. you bet
2. how? any plan?
Ceding Aksai Chin not an option for India
- Thread starter Yusuf
- Start date
2. how? any plan?
exchange? lol
do you have anything to exchange with us?
The Last Stand
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 1,406
- Likes
- 980
If you refuse to believe we have nuclear weapons, I refuse to believe that Tibet is a part of China. End of the line.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2009
- Messages
- 43,132
- Likes
- 23,841
Again, google your yields of your nuclear tests....
pmaitra
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33,262
- Likes
- 19,600
Tibetans are not Chinese, and nothing is going to change that. Ditto with the East Turkestanis. The best thing is that they don't want to be part of PRC, and want to throw the Chinese out of Tibet and East Turkestan back to China.
The Last Stand
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 1,406
- Likes
- 980
Bluff. Oh well, if you prove Google is a reliable source .............................
IGNORANCE IS BLISS.
pmaitra
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33,262
- Likes
- 19,600
I don't think the leaders in India and PRC are going to consider a nuclear war over Aksai Chin, unlike some netizens. Real life is a little bit more than Civilization V. It will be an intense war, and possibly long drawn, but will remain localized.
War there will be, no doubt, but nuclear war, it won't be.
PRC will also think twice before using cruise missiles, because, that would be a massive escalation. India has no way to tell if an approaching missile is a nuke or not. They won't risk that, because an early detection could trigger a panic.
If there is a long draw war, limited to infantry, artillery, and armour, there is a about 50% chance that PLA will lose, despite their numerical superiority.
War there will be, no doubt, but nuclear war, it won't be.
PRC will also think twice before using cruise missiles, because, that would be a massive escalation. India has no way to tell if an approaching missile is a nuke or not. They won't risk that, because an early detection could trigger a panic.
If there is a long draw war, limited to infantry, artillery, and armour, there is a about 50% chance that PLA will lose, despite their numerical superiority.
bose
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,921
- Likes
- 5,963
That is a total lie... there was no infrastructure worth naming and Indian Army were struggling to put forward its supplies.
The Indian Army even lacked proper clothing to fight in winter...
The main advantage China had that it had the prior experience of fighting a war in korea few years back which India lacked for sometime and was one of the deciding factors...
India should have put in place the forward policy a decade early in early 50's... but Nehru a pacifist under estimated China's motives here and missed the opportunity to free TIBET.
Arunachal Pradesh was never yours... you retreated from that place in 1962 because you understood very well that logistics does not allow you to have a good hold of the landmass and you are prone to counter attack from Indian Army that will cause major difficulty for you on ground... Militarily it is difficult to hold on to Arunachal Pradesh"¦
You are right Indian does not think it is a fair deal... I can tell you with all fairness INDIA WILL ACCOUNT FOR ALL YOU [CHINA] HAVE DONE TO HELP PAKISTAN TO COUNTER INDIA ... MAKE NOT MISTAKE THOSE ILLIGAL HELP TO PAKISTAN ON THEIR NUCLUEAR & MISSILE WILL BE HAVE TO BE FACTORED OUT... WE CONSIDER IT AS AN ACT OF WAR ON INDIA"¦
India will maintain the status quo on ground and continue to demand whole of the Aksai Chin... whatever be the consequences"¦
The rapid growth in Military - Industrial complexes that are currently underway are going to provide employment and will contribute to nation's industrial growth at large... The massive technology spin off coming out of various deals from Russia, Israel, Germany, France, UK etc have to have a very good downstream effect on the civilian sector. The military Industrial demand for steel & other infrastructure demands are going to put up India's GDP growth considerably.
India has enough money to spend on its defense needs that take precedence over all other requirements"¦ it is better to be safe than sorry later"¦ India is destined to be a major military power in a decade to come.
India wants to drive the last nail onto the coffin of the UN resolution on Kashmir that is already been dead for more than half a century!! Illegal transfer of land in Kashmir by Pakistan to China and foolish act of providing stapled Visa by China will make resolution to dispute impossible as I see it"¦
Last edited:
bose
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,921
- Likes
- 5,963
Last edited:
bose
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,921
- Likes
- 5,963
China will not fight a war leave alone nucluear war... China is in a hurry to solve the border dispute with India...
China has understood that cost it have to pay for continuing holstility with India...
Well, NanJing happened when China 's industrial index about 10% of Japan and 3 % of US.
Eg.the steel production : Japan 150 time more than China at that time.
USSR 350
US. 1500
We solve problem in a order, and India problem is not the primary for now.
Nuke is the fast and cheapest way to solve it if India problem happened at this time.
Eg. If India launch a full scale war with Pakistan right now.
bose
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,921
- Likes
- 5,963
Which one is on highest order ??
First ensure that you have one... the stolen one may not work now...
Pakistan is a dead horse... India does not beat dead one's...
sayareakd
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 17,734
- Likes
- 18,953
yeah, you launch nukes against us and we will do the same against you guys, 100 nukes will make China prosper in future (BTW which city you live in, i will asked them to nuke your city twice just to make sure extra dose of radiation for people around you) :thumb:
bose
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,921
- Likes
- 5,963
So the index of steel production will ensure that Nanjin will not repeat again ??? Shows your high Chinese IQ...
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2009
- Messages
- 3,582
- Likes
- 2,538
why is ceding a portion ( not all of it ) of aksai chin a problem ? isnt that already the reality on the ground ? in which case i feel that ccp should maintain the "status quo" and continue with the relative peace that has been prevailing ...it is ccp that has to observe the LAC's and stop provoking by incursions .....and we should have the peace
in reality india has already ceded a portion but is being short-changed
ccp has to learn to play to the rules which they had set to their advantage - but even that is asking for too much it seems ?
if ccp continues with border transgressions - india should consider other economic partners and reduce trade with ccp
- the usa and other wto countries eg asean , japan korea, should also considerr reduxing trade with ccp if they continue to act as an expansionist power, reminiscent of nazi germany
in reality india has already ceded a portion but is being short-changed
ccp has to learn to play to the rules which they had set to their advantage - but even that is asking for too much it seems ?
if ccp continues with border transgressions - india should consider other economic partners and reduce trade with ccp
- the usa and other wto countries eg asean , japan korea, should also considerr reduxing trade with ccp if they continue to act as an expansionist power, reminiscent of nazi germany
Last edited:
Then, what do think it will? High iQ indian
1. You may notice some countries is in panic model in west pacific.
2. I test our nuclear missile with war head at 1969.
3.well, some of of your IA officers want.
