Compersion
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 2,258
- Likes
- 923
if one remembers that bill clinton used focus groups and had a team that would call people and ask and random and datamined questions and they would analyse the same. the human interface was predominately there and the objective was to win. it got all ridiculous when it was being used for the monica lewisinky issue. now again what is the use and purpose. is it damage control for one user and winning for another stakeholder and disruption - transition for the heavens ...
is CA about winning. is CA about conducting research. is CA about campaign management.
fascinating ...
also
Indira P Gandhi had used services of a foreigner i believe a american lawyer from california i forget his name - after 1970s (in a way to manage her campaign) who turned up and according to him offered his services. i am not talking about Justice William Broome who was also a foreigner (albeit became Indian eventually) and one can say with different objectives. Everyone already knows the big cat in the bag that is Sonia Gandhi. You also have the case of NRIs and OCIs and PIOs ... what are the objectives and one can say the rules and customs and traditions to use. Also this whole composition is making it dangerous for congress since they are making it clear the reliance of foreign influence - and again away from the stakeholders within India - perhaps a internal issue is developing within the congress of foreign vs overseas vs indian.
"We are capable of doing these things on our own and do not need expensive foreign experts to teach us to execute. I personally know several big data analytics experts of International repute in India who can do what Cambridge analytics offers at much lower cost."
Poor guy probably no one understands (in fact probably he also does not) that he set it on fire.
I am really would love that this topic gets expanded and made into a wider discussion which is absolutely fascinating.
This is not at all only about Nate Silver type of work (last time i checked he only gave analysis).
is CA about winning. is CA about conducting research. is CA about campaign management.
fascinating ...
also
Indira P Gandhi had used services of a foreigner i believe a american lawyer from california i forget his name - after 1970s (in a way to manage her campaign) who turned up and according to him offered his services. i am not talking about Justice William Broome who was also a foreigner (albeit became Indian eventually) and one can say with different objectives. Everyone already knows the big cat in the bag that is Sonia Gandhi. You also have the case of NRIs and OCIs and PIOs ... what are the objectives and one can say the rules and customs and traditions to use. Also this whole composition is making it dangerous for congress since they are making it clear the reliance of foreign influence - and again away from the stakeholders within India - perhaps a internal issue is developing within the congress of foreign vs overseas vs indian.
"We are capable of doing these things on our own and do not need expensive foreign experts to teach us to execute. I personally know several big data analytics experts of International repute in India who can do what Cambridge analytics offers at much lower cost."
Poor guy probably no one understands (in fact probably he also does not) that he set it on fire.
I am really would love that this topic gets expanded and made into a wider discussion which is absolutely fascinating.
This is not at all only about Nate Silver type of work (last time i checked he only gave analysis).
Last edited: