C-17 Globemaster III (IAF)

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Can anybody tell what is the use of transport aircraft? Like it is used for transporting weapons like tanks,jeeps and ammunition to war region?
Yes QM, it is used for airborne dropping of the weapons, tanks, jeeps, troops etc in the war zone where reaching by road is not possible. But it can also be used for normal transport of the military supplies and troops.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,566
Country flag
This plane is a transport plane but it has intercontinental reach similar to a bomber.
 

Quickgun Murugan

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
778
Likes
22
Yes QM, it is used for airborne dropping of the weapons, tanks, jeeps, troops etc in the war zone where reaching by road is not possible. But it can also be used for normal transport of the military supplies and troops.
Air-borne dropping of tanks? like via parachutes?
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,566
Country flag
Almost 90% of all equipment transported by USA in the Bosnia/SERB war was done using this transport plane.
 

enlightened1

Member of The Month JANUARY 2010
Regular Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
880
Likes
60
India starts negotiations for C-17 Globemaster transport aircraft

Brazil manufactured Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) radars were also received by the IAF earlier this year.
Erm..Israel?..:)>

I always wanted to see the C-17 in IAF's colours. 10 Globemasters & 25 Gajrajs will do just fine.:twizt::twizt: I hope they upgrade the IL-76MDs' engines though.
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
[mod]Threads related to C-17 Globemaster merged[/mod]
 

proud_hindustani

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
247
Likes
4
Country flag
great India is purchasing such huge toys from USA to strengthen its IAF.

USA is :twizt: with believes that India would surely purchases more and more military toys from them in the future.

I am sure India's expenditure on C-17 Globemaster III would make Russia unhappy. :nunu:

please someone tell me, had India any plan related to development of such aircrafts with Russia??...Russia is no less than America in technological matters if they have adequate funds. and oh yeah....Any reaction from Pakistan and China???
 

mattster

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
1,171
Likes
870
Country flag
C-17 is definitely the king. Its a good choice and the common sense choice.
 

enlightened1

Member of The Month JANUARY 2010
Regular Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
880
Likes
60
I don't think the Russians would unhappy because they don't have something like the C-17 (in terms of automation technology, range, payload, short T/O & landing capability) to throw in at the moment. India has always maintained a mix of both western & russian stuff which in my opinion is a very good thing.

There are so much defense procurement programs undergoing with the Russians (brahmos, MRTA, Vikramaditya, SU-30MKI...etc) they don't have to feel threatened as they are getting their share of the pie.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,566
Country flag
Air-Attack.com :: C-17 Globemaster III Factsheet

C-17 Globemaster III

The U.S. Air Force/Boeing C-17 Globemaster III is designed to fulfill airlift needs well into the next century - carrying large combat equipment and troops or humanitarian aid across international distances directly to small austere airfields anywhere in the world



The C-17 is operated by a cockpit crew of two and one loadmaster. This cost-effective flight crew complement is made possible through the use of an advanced digital avionics system using four cathode-ray tube displays, two full-capability HUDS (Head-Up Displays) and advanced cargo systems.
The C-17 can carry virtually all of the Army's air-transportable equipment.

The design of the cargo compartment allows the C-17 to carry a wide range of vehicles, palleted cargo, para-troops, airdrop loads and aeromedical evacuees. The cargo compartment has a sufficiently large cross section to transport large wheeled and tracked vehicles efficiently, including trucks, tanks, helicopters such as the AH-1G Cobra, artillery and weapons such as the Patriot Missile System. The C-17 is capable of carrying out an airdrop of outsize firepower such as the Sheridan tank or the Bradley fighting vehicle if the Bradley is refitted to be airdrop capable. Three Bradley armoured vehicles comprise one deployment load on the C-17. The US Army M-1 main battle tank can be carried with other vehicles.

The design of the aircraft lets it operate through small, austere airfields. The C-17 can take off and land on runways as short as 3,000 feet (914 meters) and as narrow as 90 feet (27.4 meters) wide. Even on such narrow runways, the C-17 can turn around using a three-point star turn and its backing capability.

The C-17 has performance characteristics that distinguish it from its predecessors, including long-range capability, outstanding aerodynamic efficiency, ease of ground operations, heavy cargo payload capability, and ability to perform extensive airdrops over hostile territory and make precision landings and takeoffs from short or makeshift runways.
"The C-17 is the right airplane at the right time," said Norbert Smith, a McDonnell Douglas senior manager. "It's an airlifter that our deployed forces will get much use from, as demonstrated at Tuzla Airfield in Bosnia. It has today's technologies and will take the Air Force into new concepts in operations and deployments well into the future.
"With the C-17," Smith said, "both the Air Force and McDonnell Douglas have benefited significantly from the contributions of NASA?s innovative technology applications."

NASA
Like other military transports, the C-17 uses a "supercritical" wing. These are advanced airfoil designs that enhance the range, cruising speed and fuel efficiency of jet aircraft by producing weaker shock waves that create less drag and permit high efficiency. This major innovative technology was conceived through NASA Langley wind tunnel research in the 1960s. The agency researched the idea in actual flight in an F-8A at NASA Dryden and later on an F-111 aircraft.

In the mid-1970s, NASA Langley developed the winglet concept through wind tunnel research. Winglets are small, winglike vertical surfaces at each wing-tip of an aircraft that enable the airplane to fly with greater efficiency. They curve flow at the wingtip to produce a forward force on the airplane, similar to the sail on a sail boat. The concept was first demonstrated in-flight on a corporate Gates Model 28 Longhorn series Learjet, and further tested on a large DC-10 aircraft as part of the NASA Aircraft Energy Efficiency (ACEE) Program. Winglets were installed on a KC-135A tanker on loan from the Air Force and flight tested at NASA Dryden in 1979 and 1980. Eventually, winglets were applied to the C-17.

Boeing
The Defense Department launched its Cargo-Experimental (C-X) program in 1979, and the Air Force selected McDonnell Douglas as the manufacturer of the envisioned C-17 in 1981.

Boeing is on contract with the Air Force to build and deliver 120 C-17s through 2004. At the end of 2001, Boeing had delivered 80 C-17s to the USAF. The United Kingdom Royal Air Force operates four C-17s.

During normal testing, C-17s set 22 world records, including payload to altitude, time-to-climb, and short takeoff and landing mark, in which the C-17 took off in less than 1,400 feet, carried a payload of 44,000 pounds to altitude, and landed in less than 1,400 feet. The aircraft has additional records pending, which will bring the total to 33. These were set during flight testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., in 2001.
 

icecoolben

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
472
Likes
5
Reportedly the c-17 requires 20 hours of maintenance for every hour in fligt, this is its biggest disadvantage. The indian armed forces are not the best at employing and properly maintaining such hardware. Examples include shells being laid in the scorching rajastan in open. R-73 missiles getting dud. Choosing t-90 ahead of arjun as the later has hydraulic suspension to the former's torsion bar that doesn't require such maintenance. The highest crash rates in the world. U can add on and on. Boeing is going to have a tough time dealing with this particular user.
 

bsn4u1985

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
125
Likes
7
The C-17 is designed to operate from runways as short as 3,500 ft (1,064 m) and as narrow as 90 ft (27 m). In addition, the C-17 can operate out of unpaved, unimproved runways (although there is the increased probability of damage to the aircraft). The thrust reversers can be used to back the aircraft and reverse direction on narrow taxiways using a three-point (or in some cases, multi-point) turn maneuver.
it has advantage over il-76 incomparision of lift capability and strategic lift capability.it has the ability to rapidly deploy a combat unit to a potential battle area and sustain it with on-going supplies. The C-17 is also capable of performing tactical airlift, medical evacuation and airdrop missions.
 

enlightened1

Member of The Month JANUARY 2010
Regular Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
880
Likes
60
Reportedly the c-17 requires 20 hours of maintenance for every hour in fligt, this is its biggest disadvantage.
How does it fare when compared with other heavy lifters' maintenance hours? According to Boeing the 20 man-hour maintenance is a plus point.
Reliability and maintainability are two outstanding benefits of the C-17 system. Current operational requirements impose demanding reliability and maintainability. These requirements include an aircraft mission completion success probability rate of 92 percent, only 20 aircraft maintenance man-hours per flying hour...
Factsheets : C-17 Globemaster III
It must be better than the IL-76's as the IAF is buying the C-17s instead of ordering more Illyushins.
 

bsn4u1985

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
125
Likes
7
by the way il-76 is now grounded after crash...in the russian air force.so india is on doubt of running more il-76s
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top