- Joined
- Apr 28, 2012
- Messages
- 7,114
- Likes
- 7,762
Relax dude. Grab a beer and read again what AMT claims to refresh your knowledge.No, I am not changing the goalpost whatsoever. I am just avoiding the distractions and deflections you are offering: caste hierarchy, Hinduism, humiliation, "All Indians came from abroad." My point is simple. There are common genes in India, Central Asia, and Eurasia, and hence, there has been either invasion or migration or both. You even admitted migration yourself. Dispute settled.
If it were just about migration and not about time line or the divide between brahmins and dalits or between north and south Indians, no one would have cared to reply to you. It specifically talks about dates for introduction of Sanskrit in India.
But if migrations did not happen in given period then the theory holds little weight. And specifically when the above paper in nature shows that dalits, tribals and brahmins share the same haplogroup, which arose locally, then it strikes at the foundation of AMT.
Btw, the nature article is a rebuttal for the papers which claimed that R1a1 entered India through these migrations. But local origin of this haplogroup puts a question mark on the previous beliefs.
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk