The problem with deploying atgms in the plateau of ladakh is that they will be out in the open without any cover....suicide anyone?Still can slow them down considerably to take another shot....According to me Tanks work on the principle of Fire power, Mobility and Armour So the ATGMs will atleast cause considerable damage to one of those three things...
One factor that we (IA) have as advantage is that we have a long experience of sustaining bases through air route only....something our neighbours haven't had much experience.it will be crucial as modern warfare is manuevre warfare with swift responses to any battlefield event.Our air base count has improved in NE and WB with recent additions like Panagarh, Tezpur.
At the Ladakh front, for some reason we stopped short on one base, but few others were reopened.
I Guess the Poster @ Satish must have got the Idea from Hizbollah Tactics which too were fought in the hilly, mountainous regions of South Lebanon. They only had Variety of ATGMS like TOW-1, Metis, Konkurs, Kornet, Rpg-29 etc and were up against Israeli Gunships Cobra n Apaches iAI made UAVS with Merkava 4 Mbts during their 2006 war.The problem with deploying atgms in the plateau of ladakh is that they will be out in the open without any cover....suicide anyone?
Not to mention that the battlefield will be buzzing with drones and gunships,without aircover infantry would never survive a day of intense fighting.
Yes Sir I Know that. I just wanted to tell That an above 60 tonne Mammoth ie- Arjun with no supporting infrastructure cannot be used for mountainous warfare when There r Options available which r lighter, Modular more readily designed for air lift capability (extremely important) and have more or less same Firepower to hold the ground and win the day for the army...........T-90MS is not light tank, it is Main Battle Tank just like Arjun.
WPB Anders as it's codename sugest is Multipurpose Combat Platform that among many have a Light Tank/Fire Support Vehicle variant.
Not exactly true.the primary role of a tank is to punch through enemy lines, so it is usually in hostile territory,unless defending.Yes Sir I Know that. I just wanted to tell That an above 60 tonne Mammoth ie- Arjun with no supporting infrastructure cannot be used for mountainous warfare when There r Options available which r lighter, Modular more readily designed for air lift capability (extremely important) and have more or less same Firepower to hold the ground and win the day for the army...........
upgraded Pz87WE an up-Armored Leo2A4
Arjun turret from Armour module from front to end is around +1800cm without ERA part as shown in MK2, With these upgrades LEO-2A4 is a formadiable tank and same can be applied on Arjun MK-1 as design is very similar to Leo2a4, Dispite these if anyone thinks such upgrades are useless is silly, And saying LEO-2A5 is impenetrable by most advance round around is also silly claims..Upgrade Leo2a4-SG
well it's just that leopard 2A4 is a 55 ton tank with no upgrades, Arjun is a 58 ton tank with no upgrades.
this is a 59 tonne leopard 2A5 fielded back in 1992. the front turret is nearly 1.5 meters thick. and pretty much impenetrable to any round fielded today.
compared to this, the Arjun isn't very impressive.
well, IMO, the Arjun turret is a lost cause. better to scrap the whole design, and build a new smaller narrower turret. with compartmentalized ammunition. hull design is decent, with a good powerpack.
i know. and i'm comparing it to a leopard.
Il76 has a max payload of 45-50 tons,so i doubt either t90 or arjun can be airlifted by the said aircraft.t72 most definitely can be.T-72M1 Ajaya is operating N.E since early 90s, T-90S made in India are not same in weight as Russian T-90A..
T-90S Indian made are more heavy coz of Kanchan Armour inputs, Moving T-90S via IL-76 is same as Arjun MK-1..
Anders
CV-90-120
--------------------------@Kunal
OT, but can you tell me how tanks were transported by British and Americans in the Iran war 90 and 03?
I think the IA cancelled the tender for light tanks some time back.One of the reasons might be that these would be sitting ducks infront of pla. Due to superior infrastructure they can move tanks by road to our border regions.
+18m thick? so you're trying to tell me that the front turret armour is more than twice as thick as the length of the tank?Arjun turret from Armour module from front to end is around +1800cm without ERA part as shown in MK2, With these upgrades LEO-2A4 is a formadiable tank and same can be applied on Arjun MK-1 as design is very similar to Leo2a4, Dispite these if anyone thinks such upgrades are useless is silly, And saying LEO-2A5 is impenetrable by most advance round around is also silly claims..
+18m thick? so you're trying to tell me that the front turret armour is more than twice as thick as the length of the tank?
i doubt that...
as for the leopard 2A4 Evolution tanks. they're designed with urban warfare in mind, and thus the front turret armour doesn't have the same amount of resistance. and they have a fatal flaw, there's no upgraded armour around the GPS, so the armour in that region is thinner than the rest of the turret??.