Another Cheap Chinese Copy

hbogyt

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
231
Likes
11
i understand your point and you may be correct that only time can tell what the outcome will be on the long run
but have a look at the highlighted sentence in your quote its not about havin a big wallet about having the will to do, in that case russia is willing to spend its limited resoures on R&D while china is busy copying the stuff, reverse engineering is not the same a spendin on r&D
when you reverse engineer you do learn something but you always reverse engineer from something to something means some under county already had the tech before and you are playing catch up,
it shows that your would not invent something new you will only be second best but never the best till the will is there and its clearly not there in case of china
It shows nothing of that sort, but that you have not a clue.

It's either copy and raise our starting baseline or R&D our way up from scratch. Clearly the former is the better option. Then we innovate from there.

Chinese radars in some areas do surpass Russian equivalents. I think OOE's dear comrade Xinhui can elaborate on this; that there are several instances where countries bought Russian missiles with Chinese radars.
 

Vladimir79

Professional
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
1,404
Likes
82
I never said that China has surpass every barrier when it comes to Jet engine development. But their legacy in manufacturing and deploying the same on Jet fighter speaks a lot about their ability in engine development.
You talking about J-7s? It took them 20 years to figure out rather basic technologies of which they had full access to develop.

Accepted WS-10 is not fully ready as it is not giving required thrust as its russian counterpart and still not in line with computerized digital control, but still China has atleast shown that they can still make a headway in developing and deploying WS-10 on their J-10s and Su-27 series jets. It is only a matter of time.
That is all very true, but time is not something you have when your opponents are developing the next generation far faster than you are on the one already behind.

Since, reverse engineering complex engine design like AL-31/AL-31F is not an easy task, but still they have certainly shown some resolve in doing the same. In the past as well, many of their jets in currant inventory like J-7, J-8 and host of other jets are now running on reverse engineered copies of Russian jets. I am not saying that China has never failed in reverse engineering as well, but as far as their vintage fighter jets are concerned, they are certainly running on reverse copies.
I think "vintage" is the key word. While it might take us 8 years to develop an engine, it takes them 20. The curve is by far in our favour. By the time their engines come into wide use, they are already antiques to us.

Under such circumstances, even if Russia withdraw its support in engine export then only it will matter very little for them as they will rather looked to run their jets in lower thrust engine, since then only they will posed major challange to any airforce in the region including IAF.
Running a jet that takes several times longer to attain military thrust is a distinct disadvantage. It makes dog fights impossible, hard to outdistance missile envelop, sortie generation and a number of other factors. To go into wide scale production with such a flaw is unthinkable.

As far as what I know, Russians are in a Chinese pocket because China is not a country to whom anyone can withdraw its support so easily as far as its Economic might is concerned.
Chinese are reliant on our energy supplies. We always hold the trump card.
 

Vladimir79

Professional
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
1,404
Likes
82
well, only time can tell us the finals.

I don't think russia's tech edge can last 10 more years.

let's wait and see.

ecnomy is the base, all others incluidng tech is the upper buildings on it.

without the sustained heavy investment, any R&D is not sustainable,because R&D of defence hightech is soo expensive.

that is why Russia defence tech was left behind by yankee's in 1990s when Russia was banrupty.

today, case is that china has much bigger wallet than Russia's and can invest much more fund on defence R&D than Russian.
Chinese also has built much more modern labs than Russia .
the only thing that chinese needs is just time.
time does stand by chinese ,instead of Russians:blum3:.
You certainly have a cash advantage but you are missing the real keys to application of R&D. The first and biggest thing Russia has over China is access to Western technology from cutting edge countries in the EU. We conduct joint projekts with them all the time. We share funding with not only these nations but also big players like India. This makes up for a large portion of our money crunch. The third thing we have over China is competition. Our aircraft industries must compete with the latest Western fighters which pushes us to come out with latest technologies. Finally, our aerospace has been consolidated, trimmed, and modernised into OAK. The companies that have produced some of the greatest fighters the world has ever seen are all under one roof working together on the projekts required of them. We have not only the greatest minds of Russia working on it, but India, France, Italy, Ukraine, Belarus, and a host of other nations. Our military ties extend far beyond our borders. We are not isolated like China who has to not only start from scratch, but has an inefficient communist ownership.
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
You certainly have a cash advantage but you are missing the real keys to application of R&D. The first and biggest thing Russia has over China is access to Western technology from cutting edge countries in the EU. We conduct joint projekts with them all the time. We share funding with not only these nations but also big players like India. This makes up for a large portion of our money crunch. The third thing we have over China is competition. Our aircraft industries must compete with the latest Western fighters which pushes us to come out with latest technologies. Finally, our aerospace has been consolidated, trimmed, and modernised into OAK. The companies that have produced some of the greatest fighters the world has ever seen are all under one roof working together on the projekts required of them. We have not only the greatest minds of Russia working on it, but India, France, Italy, Ukraine, Belarus, and a host of other nations. Our military ties extend far beyond our borders. We are not isolated like China who has to not only start from scratch, but has an inefficient communist ownership.
forget it!
1. nobody else are ready to maket real key tech ...... which you should know very clearly....the blueprint might be stolen or pirated,but the base tech like "material and machining" needs the accumulation of experience and data and are very hard to be stolen and pirated..and the industry base is impossible to steal or pirate...


2.Frankly speaking, except EU and USA, nobody esle can provide something helpful to Russia as for defence tech.
but I doubt that EU or USA are ready to help Russia with defence tech....:)

the 4 are USA,Russia ,China and EU(as a whole),and the rest 0.5 is Japan

3,Russian glory past can not naturely prove that Russia will have glory future.
As for it ,you as Russian should know it more clearly than me.....after Soviet callopsed, Russia defence tech develops very slowly.

4. Russian economy falls into the trape of "Arabianized"
unless Russian can change its oil-dependent economy structure and make its manufacturing-base revive, Russian can hardly own a real glory futre
 

tharikiran

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
763
Likes
1,040
Country flag
. nobody else are ready to maket real key tech ...... which you should know very clearly....the blueprint might be stolen or pirated,but the base tech like "material and machining" needs the accumulation of experience and data and are very hard to be stolen and pirated..and the industry base is impossible to steal or pirate...


Look who's talkin about blue prints.Your post was the joke of the day. Russia is one of the fastest growing economies whether you like it or not.They have seen rock bottom, it's only going up for them now.

Other than the EU and the US, not many countries manufacture aircrafts and high end defense technologies for your information. You don't have access to to what Russia has. It's you who's delusional and living in a dream.
 

ahmedsid

Top Gun
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
2,960
Likes
252
forget it!
1. nobody else are ready to maket real key tech ...... which you should know very clearly....the blueprint might be stolen or pirated,but the base tech like "material and machining" needs the accumulation of experience and data and are very hard to be stolen and pirated..and the industry base is impossible to steal or pirate...


2.Frankly speaking, except EU and USA, nobody esle can provide something helpful to Russia as for defence tech.
but I doubt that EU or USA are ready to help Russia with defence tech....:)

the 4 are USA,Russia ,China and EU(as a whole),and the rest 0.5 is Japan

3,Russian glory past can not naturely prove that Russia will have glory future.
As for it ,you as Russian should know it more clearly than me.....after Soviet callopsed, Russia defence tech develops very slowly.

4. Russian economy falls into the trape of "Arabianized"
unless Russian can change its oil-dependent economy structure and make its manufacturing-base revive, Russian can hardly own a real glory futre
Russia gets to know about the best Western tech through India! Why do you think that inspite of the Western tech we buy, Indo Russian Relations are strong, proven by the Joint Statement taken out by our President and the Russian President!

Russia has a win win situation with India.
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
. nobody else are ready to maket real key tech ...... which you should know very clearly....the blueprint might be stolen or pirated,but the base tech like "material and machining" needs the accumulation of experience and data and are very hard to be stolen and pirated..and the industry base is impossible to steal or pirate...


Look who's talkin about blue prints.Your post was the joke of the day. Russia is one of the fastest growing economies whether you like it or not.They have seen rock bottom, it's only going up for them now.

Other than the EU and the US, not many countries manufacture aircrafts and high end defense technologies for your information. You don't have access to to what Russia has. It's you who's delusional and living in a dream.
guy, have you really study the economy of Russia?

Russian economy are depending on oil and gas more and more day by day.

Except its oil/gas industry, the other sections of its industry are declining day by day ,from textile to auto, from ship to chip...

if Russia doesn't change the tendency, Russia will lost its industry base and become a big "S-Arabia",howevery rich it will be.
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
4. Russian economy falls into the trape of "Arabianized"
unless Russian can change its oil-dependent economy structure and make its manufacturing-base revive, Russian can hardly own a real glory futre

firstly russia owns immense oil supplies on its territory , secondly V Putin is adding even more ( potential) resources by enforcing a claim to the N Pole's petroleum and related resources ....not like to be in any kind of shortage for the forseeable future and beyond
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
Russia gets to know about the best Western tech through India! Why do you think that inspite of the Western tech we buy, Indo Russian Relations are strong, proven by the Joint Statement taken out by our President and the Russian President!

Russia has a win win situation with India.
frankly speaking, India has not risen onto the arena,when global defence tech race is concerned.

Before India take part in the club of USA,EU,Russia and China, India should fix its industry base first.
 

tharikiran

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
763
Likes
1,040
Country flag
guy, have you really study the economy of Russia?

Russian economy are depending on oil and gas more and more day by day.

Except its oil/gas industry, the other sections of its industry are declining day by day ...

if Russia doesn't change the tendency, Russia will lost its industry base and become a big "S-Arabia",howevery rich it will be.
As long as china assumes that Russia is based on oil and nothing else. Russia has nothing to lose.You better rethink.It's making all round progress including IT.
 

NSG_Blackcats

Member of The Month OCTOBER 2009
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
3,489
Likes
1,559
guy, have you really study the economy of Russia?

Russian economy are depending on oil and gas more and more day by day.

Except its oil/gas industry, the other sections of its industry are declining day by day ,from textile to auto, from ship to chip...

if Russia doesn't change the tendency, Russia will lost its industry base and become a big "S-Arabia",howevery rich it will be.
You need to check your source.

As export is a major component of Chinese Economy, Oil plays a critical role in Russian economy. Have you forgot about their defense industry, their nuclear technology and I can give you a long list.

If China is so capable why they are using Russian Engines on their so called great fighter planes like J-10 and JF-17? Just ask anyone from NATO they will give you a good idea about the capability of Russian technology.
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
You need to check your source.

As export is a major component of Chinese Economy, Oil plays a critical role in Russian economy. Have you forgot about their defense industry, their nuclear technology and I can give you a long list.

If China is so capable why they are using Russian Engines on their so called great fighter planes like J-10 and JF-17? Just ask anyone from NATO they will give you a good idea about the capability of Russian technology.
1,export is not as important ot chinese economy as you said.

the current fact shows that Chinese economy still can grow 7%+,although Chinese export decline 20%+ this year.

2.the decline of a wide and versatile industry base always means the undermining of the defence industry base.
Russian friends should know the danger more clearly than me.. it is reported that Russia navy will import warships from France....it should be the first time that Russia has import weapon abroad since WW II.


...frankly speaking, Stalin fixed a one of most consolidated industry base for Russia but the industy base has been collapsing until now,after Soviet collapsed.
 

SATISH

DFI Technocrat
Ambassador
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,038
Likes
303
Country flag
1,export is not as important ot chinese economy as you said.

the current fact shows that Chinese economy still can grow 7%+,although Chinese export decline 20%+ this year.

2.the decline of a wide and versatile industry base always means the undermining of the defence industry base.
Russian friends should know the danger more clearly than me.. it is reported that Russia navy will import warships from France....it should be the first time that Russia has import weapon abroad since WW II.


...frankly speaking, Stalin fixed a one of most consolidated industry base for Russia but the industy base has been collapsing until now,after Soviet collapsed.
MiG 15 engine *cough*
 

ZOOM

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
577
Likes
11
You talking about J-7s? It took them 20 years to figure out rather basic technologies of which they had full access to develop.

That is all very true, but time is not something you have when your opponents are developing the next generation far faster than you are on the one already behind.



I think "vintage" is the key word. While it might take us 8 years to develop an engine, it takes them 20. The curve is by far in our favour. By the time their engines come into wide use, they are already antiques to us.



Running a jet that takes several times longer to attain military thrust is a distinct disadvantage. It makes dog fights impossible, hard to outdistance missile envelop, sortie generation and a number of other factors. To go into wide scale production with such a flaw is unthinkable.
First of all I am not contexting here how much time taken by chinese to develop J-7, that is not a moot point. Certainly they have had a maximum input from russians as well to develop J-7, but reality is that they had certainly manage to produce them in large numbers. And that is exactly what matter at the moment in addition to exporting them to rough states like Pakistan at a short notice during Parliment attack in India. What I am trying to make a point here is that, leaving aside all their failures and huge timelines Chinese have taken to develop a particuler jets, but they were certainly succesfull deploying the same either directly or indirectly against nations like India, in this case Pakistani Airforce which they indirectly used.

Even during 1971 war, China had trasferred many reverse engineered copies of Mig-17 to pakistan although they were not as good as Russian one as far as engine thrust is concerned, even some of them had only limited lifespan of 100 hrs as far as their engine life is concered, but those Mig-17s were successfully used by Pakistan by configuring them with US made Air to Air missiles against IAF.

Chinese are reliant on our energy supplies. We always hold the trump card.
Sorry boss, above sentenence is not in consonance with what you used comment, since I can even say that China is securing various Energy reserve across the world, and russian one that you are talking is one among various option that china is exploring. Just because China could lose Russian supply of fuel, it doesn't mean that all the industrial activities in china will come to standstill.
 

Vladimir79

Professional
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
1,404
Likes
82
forget it!
1. nobody else are ready to maket real key tech ...... which you should know very clearly....the blueprint might be stolen or pirated,but the base tech like "material and machining" needs the accumulation of experience and data and are very hard to be stolen and pirated..and the industry base is impossible to steal or pirate...
You have license to produce 80% of the J-11 so it was practically handed to you. There has been no major Chinese innovation or technical skill in copying the technology or production since we gave it to you. What we didn't give you was engine technology and power pack supply and you have so far failed in the endeavour since you have failed engines and are stealing Su-27 power packs.


2.Frankly speaking, except EU and USA, nobody esle can provide something helpful to Russia as for defence tech.
but I doubt that EU or USA are ready to help Russia with defence tech....:)
The USA will give us nothing, but we do have access to France, of which their defence companies are giving us their cutting edge. I am sure you have respect for Thales.

3,Russian glory past can not naturely prove that Russia will have glory future.
As for it ,you as Russian should know it more clearly than me.....after Soviet callopsed, Russia defence tech develops very slowly.
Our defence tech is in a process of rebirth, the reasons for the stagnation under the Yeltsin era are well known. As our military faces reformation, so do our industries, of which you will not be able to compete. Even during our dark years China was a non-competitor in the global arms trade.

4. Russian economy falls into the trape of "Arabianized"
unless Russian can change its oil-dependent economy structure and make its manufacturing-base revive, Russian can hardly own a real glory futre
Do you really know anything about the Russian economy? Our oil exports are around 6% of GDP while Saudi Arabia is more like 40. Our economy is far more diversified than Wahhabis. Your economy is based on EU/US exports, without it your economy would collapse.
 

Vladimir79

Professional
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
1,404
Likes
82
First of all I am not contexting here how much time taken by chinese to develop J-7, that is not a moot point. Certainly they have had a maximum input from russians as well to develop J-7, but reality is that they had certainly manage to produce them in large numbers. And that is exactly what matter at the moment in addition to exporting them to rough states like Pakistan at a short notice during Parliment attack in India. What I am trying to make a point here is that, leaving aside all their failures and huge timelines Chinese have taken to develop a particuler jets, but they were certainly succesfull deploying the same either directly or indirectly against nations like India, in this case Pakistani Airforce which they indirectly used.
How many IAF fighters did J-7s shoot down? Look at the F-7 fleet today. China has fallen so far behind the times, Pakistan opted for Italian radar, and theirs are better than the J-7s still in PLAAF service today.

Even during 1971 war, China had trasferred many reverse engineered copies of Mig-17 to pakistan although they were not as good as Russian one as far as engine thrust is concerned, even some of them had only limited lifespan of 100 hrs as far as their engine life is concered, but those Mig-17s were successfully used by Pakistan by configuring them with US made Air to Air missiles against IAF.
I thought we were talking about China's self-sufficiency in military production and technology. Pakistan has access to Western suppliers which puts many of their systems above their Chinese counterparts. Everything China has copied has been inferior in quality, not to say they are not deadly but that is not the point.

Sorry boss, above sentenence is not in consonance with what you used comment, since I can even say that China is securing various Energy reserve across the world, and russian one that you are talking is one among various option that china is exploring. Just because China could lose Russian supply of fuel, it doesn't mean that all the industrial activities in china will come to standstill.
We account for 10% of Chinese oil imports and soon to almost double that with the opening of the East Siberian-Pacific. That is an amount that cannot be ignored. That is like the US cutting off Venezuela and in the future like cutting off Saudi Arabia. We control most of the Central Asian pipelines that feed China as well. We always hold the trump card.
 

F-14

Global Defence Moderator
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
1,563
Likes
27
while Saudi Arabia is more like 40.
vladmiar sir oil amounts for 90% of the KSA's economy even now
 

ZOOM

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
577
Likes
11
How many IAF fighters did J-7s shoot down? Look at the F-7 fleet today. China has fallen so far behind the times, Pakistan opted for Italian radar, and theirs are better than the J-7s still in PLAAF service today.
Thing that I don't understand in which direction you are bringing this debate. Yes we can go on on in discussing Chinese R&D and their quality background. That is not the point I am making. All I am saying is that, the proven utility of those Chinese reverse engineered technology not only to itself but also to its allies like Pakistan and all other dictatorship regime across the world. I never said that those F-7 had ever shot down any IAF jet, all I am saying that as far as history is concerned(In this case reverse copies of Mig-17 and subsequent use in 1971 war through Pakistan), they have certainly manage to utilize whatever their in their inventory against India, but this time round they used it through Pakistan.


I thought we were talking about China's self-sufficiency in military production and technology. Pakistan has access to Western suppliers which puts many of their systems above their Chinese counterparts. Everything China has copied has been inferior in quality, not to say they are not deadly but that is not the point.

So "Everything China has copies has been inferior in quality", please describe what this sentence is all about. If this was the case, then India should attack China right now and liberate Tibet and its occupied territory, isn't it? because according to you inferior means it won't work during War.

We account for 10% of Chinese oil imports and soon to almost double that with the opening of the East Siberian-Pacific. That is an amount that cannot be ignored. That is like the US cutting off Venezuela and in the future like cutting off Saudi Arabia. We control most of the Central Asian pipelines that feed China as well. We always hold the trump card.
Hey mate, please please don't get into this irrelavant commenting. You certainly need to go and do some soul searching about China's effort of securing energy resources across the world, at the same time, Arab world is fast diverting its attention towards emerging powers like China from Western nations and willing to lend thier support in every possible way they can. Regarding trump card of Russia, Russia is the sole loser over here to lost one of the biggest consumer of Oil in the world if it ever think about shutting its oil wells to China.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top