Andhra police to arrest Owaisi for hate speech

KS

Bye bye DFI
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
8,005
Likes
5,758
Addl Cases under IPC Sections 120(b), 124(a), 295(a), 505 & 188 filed against akbaruddin per SP SarvaSresht Tripathi - EENADU - Breaking News



120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy.--
(1) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable with death, 2[ imprisonment for life] or rigorous imprisonment for a term of two years or upwards, shall, where no express provision is made in this Code for the punishment of such a conspiracy, be punished in the same manner as if he had abetted such offence.
(2) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable as aforesaid shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding six months, or with fine or with both.] CHAPTER VI OF OFFENCES AGAINST THE STATE CHAPTER VI OF OFFENCES AGAINST THE STATE
124A. 1[ Sedition.-- Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, 2[ the Government established by law in 3[ India], a 4[ shall be punished with 5[ imprisonment for life], to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine. Explanation 1.- The expression" disaffection" includes disloyalty and all feelings of enmity. Explanation 2.- Comments expressing disapprobation of the measures of the Government with a view to obtain their alteration by lawful means, without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. Explanation 3.- Comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the Government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section.]
505. 1[ Statements conducing public mischief.-- 2[
(1) ] Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement, rumour or report,-
(a) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, any officer, soldier, 3[ sailor or airman] in the Army, 4[ Navy or Air Force] 5[ of India] to mutiny or otherwise disregard or fail in his duty as such; or
(b) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, fear or alarm to the public, or to any section of the public whereby any person may be induced to commit an offence against the State or against the public tranquility; or
1. Subs. by Act 4 of 1898, s. 6, for the original section.
2. Renumbered by Act 35 of 1969, s. 3.
3. Subs. by Act 10 of 1927, s. 2 and Such. I, for" or sailor".
4. Subs. by s. 2 and Sch. i. ibid., for" or navy".
5. Subs. by the A. O. 1950, for" of Her Majesty or in the Imperial Service Troops". The words" or in the Royal Indian Marine" occurring after the word" Majesty" were rep. by Act 35 of 1934.​
(c) with intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to 1[ three years], or with fine, or with both.​

(2) 2[ Statements creating or promoting enmity, hatred or ill- will between classes.-- Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement or report containing rumour or alarming news with intent to create or promote, or which is likely to create or promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, feelings of enmity, hatred or ill- will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

(3) Offence under sub- section (2) committed in place of worship, etc.-- Whoever commits an offence specified in sub- section (2) in any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine.] Exception.- It does not amount to an offence, within the meaning of this section, when the person making, publishing or circulating any such statement, rumour or report, has reasonable grounds for believing that such statement, rumour or report is true and makes, publishes or circulates it 2[ in good faith and] without any such intent as aforesaid.]
188. Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant.-- Whoever, knowing that, by an order promulgated by a public servant lawfully empowered to promulgate such order, he is directed to abstain from a certain act, or to take certain order with certain property in his possession or under his management. disobeys such direction, shall, if such disobedience causes or tends to cause obstruction, annoyance or injury, or risk of obstruction, annoyance or injury, to any persons lawfully employed, be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or with both: and if such disobedience causes or tends to cause danger to human life, health or safety, or causes or tends to cause a riot or affray, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Explanation.- It is not necessary that the offender should intend to produce harm, or contemplate his disobedience as likely to produce harm. It is sufficient that he knows of the order which he disobeys, and that his disobedience produces, or is likely to produce, harm. Illustration An order is promulgated by a public servant lawfully empowered to promulgated such order, directing that a religious procession shall not pass down a certain street. A knowingly disobeys the order, and thereby causes danger of riot. A has committed the offence defined in this section.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
I find it amazing that apart from some Muslims leaders (Sazia Ilmi being one such exception), none are reasy to openly condemn Owassi.

Even teh evergreen Javed Akhtar who is so camouflagedly voluble for Muslim causes and his rather normal looking actress wife!

All hate monger requires condemnation as was seen when Varun Gandhi yapped or Togadia tool off in the blue. None justified that because Muslims have done so like the Imman of Jama Mazjid, Varun Gandhi should be left unaccountable. There was no hedging observed from a large majority of Hindu stalwarts (except the right wing), but here I see the Muslim leaders including the Congress leaders of AP pulling punches but never condemning this idiot Owassi.

This lack of even handedness is what creates the problem that is besotting and dividing India.

To me, whether the rat is white or black does not matter, so long as he does not try to divide Indian society.
 

KS

Bye bye DFI
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
8,005
Likes
5,758
Akbaruddin Owaisi petitions dismissed by Nirmal court, no special status (special cell) and no transfer to Hyderabad Jail


Yesterday heavy cracker bursting in Barkas.
 

Sabir

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
2,116
Likes
793
Addl Cases under IPC Sections 120(b), 124(a), 295(a), 505 & 188 filed against akbaruddin per SP SarvaSresht Tripathi - EENADU - Breaking News
These are BS...Just put him in cell with hardened thugs for 14 days. His hole will become so large that all hatred in him will drain out through it.
 

KS

Bye bye DFI
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
8,005
Likes
5,758
Petition to remove Owaisi's speeches from YouTube dismissed By AP Highcourt
 

ganesh177

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
1,308
Likes
1,657
Country flag
Petition to remove Owaisi's speeches from YouTube dismissed By AP Highcourt
Just curious, who filed this petition. And who will benefit from removing the video ?
 

Iamanidiot

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
5,325
Likes
1,504
Akbaruddin Owaisi petitions dismissed by Nirmal court, no special status (special cell) and no transfer to Hyderabad Jail


Yesterday heavy cracker bursting in Barkas.
Iam personally quiet accquinted with the pahelwans.Now MIMs major problem is that they will not be able to deal with the Kurubaguda BCs
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,080
Likes
40,077
Country flag
Lol I know Adilabad district HQ town at the back of my hand. The district prison complex is right next to an ill-maintained municipal mortuary and smashan-ghat, and has a 24/7 stench. Enjoy f#cker!
 

Iamanidiot

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
5,325
Likes
1,504
Lol I know Adilabad district HQ town at the back of my hand. The district prison complex is right next to an ill-maintained municipal mortuary and smashan-ghat, and has a 24/7 stench. Enjoy f#cker!
Tarun long time to see how are you.TDP is going great guns in Telangana I suppose
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

Articles

Top