- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 31,122
- Likes
- 41,041
What you are saying ?Fake tests, fake Lt.Col.
And pls if you have issues with him Email him..
Ban his site if you think you are right !
Till than his work is authentic..
What you are saying ?Fake tests, fake Lt.Col.
yeah Kunal sir is right, infact both have different way of storing ammo so that it will not have secondary explosions. I have internal pics of both the tanks ammo storage area, it wont be good to post them on net, if some senior member wants it i can share it.Arjun Ammo stores in tight containers behind the loaders, But in Leo the ammo is behind the loader also it is placed in other places..
T-80 is 1976 tank, T-90S is 1997.T-90S protection is far better than T-80, Members given the links in previous posts..
So you claim that Indian army has 840 hp engine instead of 1000 hp.Any ways it does not give the amount required..
And the claim of 840hp is only given by IA and its SOLID!..
Arjun do loss some power but it was specified before, unlike T-90s..
The ammo storage in arjune and Leopard 2 are basically similar.Arjun Ammo stores in tight containers behind the loaders, But in Leo the ammo is behind the loader also it is placed in other places..
It is not a copy, but it has some drawbacks of Leo-2 which Germans now solved.Arjun is not 100% copy as you falsely assumed..
I suppose you do not have info on this and this is your assumption.Composite Armour of Arjun is much harder in those weak zones..
Arjune has the same shot traps as Leo-2 as the India just copied them, it is evident and it will be probably solved like in case of Leo2A5-6As i said Arjun evolved better than LEOA4 degin, The Deign rectify most errors, But not like Germans with LEOA5..
The same goes for composite armor, you may find out how it looks after single shot here - http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/1757/hobxeim1.jpg and - http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2439/15149962.jpg http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/1802/35551518.jpgERA are good for one shot, But its the main Armour which last longer..
Yes, I published several articles about it.Btw, Do you have any information on Knife ERA ?
Yes made this drawing about 5 years ago, not very preciese but gives basic idea.protection blocks inside the turret of T-72B
leo2 storage in hull http://s39.radikal.ru/i085/1108/08/85aed9d61000.jpgyeah Kunal sir is right, infact both have different way of storing ammo so that it will not have secondary explosions. I have internal pics of both the tanks ammo storage area, it wont be good to post them on net, if some senior member wants it i can share it.
What you are saying ?
And pls if you have issues with him Email him..
Ban his site if you think you are right !
Till than his work is authentic..
1. My point is: T-90S is much better protected than T-80 as you posted its not likely..T-80 is 1976 tank, T-90S is 1997.
So you claim that Indian army has 840 hp engine instead of 1000 hp.
Can you prove this?
The ammo storage in arjune and Leopard 2 are basically similar.
I suppose you do not have info on this and this is your assumption.
The same goes for composite armor, you may find out how it looks after single shot here - http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/1757/hobxeim1.jpg and - http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2439/15149962.jpg http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/1802/35551518.jpg
T-90S has both combined and both dynamic armor - it is advantage.
Any Image pls post..Yes, I published several articles about it.
It is not good - will not allow sufficient rate of fire as using the turret storage is much more convinient.Arjun is larger in size compare to Leo A4 it enhance Ammo carrying capacity, But their are no Ammo placed in the turret like A4, Its all in Hull, In tight fire proof containers..
If you read abt tests you call fakes, In tests T-80 was equipped with K5 penetrated by AP/HEAT where T-90S deign kept that from happening..1. What exactly T-80? T-80UD, T-80U, plain T-80?
I mentioned specifically It didnt preform upto expectation in thar desert as it suppose to do....2. It is not correct, the actual power depends on air temperature, I did explain this.
Yes they do, But what i am telling you is its is rectified to most extend, Include Ammo storage in turret & Sight placement..3. I did not said it is exact copy, but sdome design flows from Leo-2 which i mention are now on Arjune
Its weakened not finished like ERA does, Thats why its a dynamic protection..5. The photos show that modern armor arrays on western tanks are also "1 shot". Another point that after the explosion of ERA on T-90S it still has conventional armor array. You clearly see what happened to merkava after hit of cumulative warhead - this areas are completely weakened after 1st shot.
Noz era
Photo - http://btvt.narod.ru/1/bronja_ukraini/0_6.jpg
Here you can look at other photo - КомплекÑÐ½Ð°Ñ Ð·Ð°Ñ‰Ð¸Ñ‚Ð° бронетанковой техники УкраинÑкий подход
test of anti tandem capabilities - http://btvt.narod.ru/1/armor_72_80_84/20.jpg
from - СоÑтоÑние и перÑпективы уÑÐ¸Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð·Ð°Ñ‰Ð¸Ñ‰ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾Ñти Ñовременных танков
And basic information about tank protection - Бронирование Ñовременных отечеÑтвенных танков
Some cylinders may be fire extinguishers..and by the way here on your photo - http://s54.radikal.ru/i144/1108/a5/4be1a44d6e2d.jpg what is this )))
@Sir,Kunal sir so next time i know where to hit arjun tank, so that it will be made useless, not to forget crew lives at stake.
Israeli tank was hit on its door at the back because they posted so many pics on net and it end up destroyed.
Shiv aroor should be hanged for posting these pic on net.
No, don't try to fool me, this is ammo stowage.Some cylinders may be fire extinguishers..
Look at the seal over the shell caps in arjun ammo storage, i provided and compare to above one..
No, don't try to fool me, this is ammo stowage.
Its your view, Which is most welcomed, But i not buying it either..Don't try to tell me that black is white, I do see that no pronlems whith turret shot traps is solved.
The tests, as I informed are FAKE. If you want I will explain this in future.
It is not good to tell me that arjun has no ammo in turret, in reality it has same stowage as Leo-2 - http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/6593/46994929.jpg as well as blow off panels.Its your view, Which is most welcomed, But i not buying it either..
See, i have provided you the pics, U found some cylinderical objects you said " This are ammo ", And i said "NO"It is not good to tell me that arjun has no ammo in turret, in reality it has same stowage as Leo-2 - http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/6593/46994929.jpg as well as blow off panels.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | Pakistan show interest in Ukraine Oplot main battle tank | Pakistan | 0 | |
T-80UD Main Battle Tank - A Pakistani Perspective | Defence Wiki | 0 | ||
W | Taiwan will purchase 108 M1A2 Abrams main battle tanks from U.S. | Land Forces | 6 | |
W | Pakistan Procuring 300 T-90 Main Battle Tanks from Russia. | Pakistan | 68 |