Shashi Tharoor: Britain owes reparations to India

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
Well, we don't have a visa waiver to any of the commonwealth countries, nor are there any tangible trade/capital benefits. It's just a forum for Indian Uncle Toms to wank their delusions of grandeur, because their scope of history doesn't go beyond the past 250 years.
It's not really delusions of grandeur. Grandeaur implies superiority complex. Cunts who worship the people who raped and pillaged their lands by defn can't have superiority complex. Self loathing self respect lacking whores would be the least offensive way to put what they are.


That aside, why is there no call of any kind for exit from commonwealth from any politicians yet in India ? And is it true modi is visiting that pos land?
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,080
Likes
40,077
Country flag
It's not really delusions of grandeur. Grandeaur implies superiority complex. Cunts who worship the people who raped and pillaged their lands by defn can't have superiority complex. Self loathing self respect lacking whores would be the least offensive way to put what they are.
I meant the bitch-complex. You're prison-raped by a lifer, and then you become his bitch. This phenomenon is explored in Game of Thrones' character of Theon Greyjoy. Every "celebration" of the British Commonwealth by Indians is playing the prison-bitch.

IThat aside, why is there no call of any kind for exit from commonwealth from any politicians yet in India ? And is it true modi is visiting that pos land?
Probably because the Commonwealth meets up at least thrice a year at exotic locations, and our netas/bureaucrats want to grasp at every opportunity of a junket.
 

Aravind Sanjeev

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
68
Likes
69
That aside, why is there no call of any kind for exit from commonwealth from any politicians yet in India ? And is it true modi is visiting that pos land?
The Commonwealth was constituted by London declaration in 1949 which establishes member states as "free and equal". The Head of the Commonwealth, presently Queen Elizabeth II, is recognized by the members of the Commonwealth of Nations as the "symbol of their free association" and serves as a leader. Even if the queen does not have any power over the administrative side of any member nations she still under agreement can visit any members without a visa which is a question of integrity to our great nation.

Commonwealth should be abandoned by India.
 

OneGrimPilgrim

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
5,243
Likes
6,810
Country flag
Japan manned up and paid Korea and Taiwan-ROC reparations. As did Italy to Libya. Britain doesn't want to man-up, probably because all its _men_ fvcked off to the US and Australia, leaving behind sissy sexually-confused poms with a perpetual inferiority complex.
not all of those were left behind; many of them spilled over into the lap of Liberty Maai.
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,962
Likes
16,868
Country flag
I don't even understand why India continues to be a part of the Commonwealth.
Actually, I think it is an issue that doesn't move anybody, and so Indian politicians have forgotten about that. Who cares about Commonwealth in India. People only know that that there're some games played in Commonwealth games, hardly caring what this Commonwealth actually stands for. And, fact is there's no commonwealth in reality, just a fiction.

May be someone needs to raise the issue and I guess India will promptly pull out of it.
 

OneGrimPilgrim

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
5,243
Likes
6,810
Country flag
The Commonwealth was constituted by London declaration in 1949 which establishes member states as "free and equal". The Head of the Commonwealth, presently Queen Elizabeth II, is recognized by the members of the Commonwealth of Nations as the "symbol of their free association" and serves as a leader. Even if the queen does not have any power over the administrative side of any member nations she still under agreement can visit any members without a visa which is a question of integrity to our great nation.

Commonwealth should be abandoned by India.
contrary to what the term actually means, it sounds like (in the above context), put simply in Hindi, 'baap ki jaageer', or, here, 'raani ka maal'.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
May be someone needs to raise the issue and I guess India will promptly pull out of it.
Oh don't be so sure. I am pretty sure there will be enough daughter selling cunts who would protest the pull out saying how much they enjoy the days when britshits raped their motherland(mom) and how Indians should be greatful for britshits fucking them than get out of that pos organisation...

You will see proof for my claim in this very thread.
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,962
Likes
16,868
Country flag
Oh don't be so sure. I am pretty sure there will be enough daughter selling cunts who would protest the pull out saying how much they enjoy the days when britshits raped their mom , wife and daughters and how Indians should be greatful for britshits fucking them than get out of that pos organisation...

You will see proof for my claim in this very thread.
Oh, there will always be those. But the fact is that those people have lost their traction and the larger no. of people now is nationalistic except a few ragtags in media and so called intelligentsia. They don't matter anymore. Not a single political party would dare to oppose if the points are raised properly and as @OneGrimPilgrim mantioned the 'Baap Ka Jageer' concept is highlighted.

At the end of the day, whatever the sold out intellectuals may have to say, people will always side with nation's pride and politicos have to follow that.
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
Excellent speech, should have thrown in a few more insults :yo:
 

apple

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
612
Likes
174
@apple

I am not going to defend my numbers I will stand by my claims.

The facts are British navy was neutralised in ww2 not many naval battles in the Pacific or in the European theatre.

USA played a leading role in saving Europe.

3-5 million Indian origin soldiers took part in ww2 greater than the population of all of Australia at the time Even "cowardly sikhs" were called upon to help mother England.
Cowardly Indian casualty is estimated to be 2.5 million.

British were not humiliated living in the tunnels and many parts of London were not destroyed and churchill's speeches saved Europe these were just errors in my post.
Of course you're standing by your numbers. You are a moderator of DFI which, by definition means you're an idiot. You are so, so, so wrong.

But sure, just keep lying/ being an idiot in the true tradition of the DFI moderators

this is how Gurkhas 'ran away' from some battles in history (ie, after doing their job):

http://www.badassoftheweek.com/index.cgi?search=1&tag=Gurkha

also, some weeks back had come across an article i think on a merchant navy/navy veterans website, where it was given in gloomy details how Britain (and its navy & merchant marine; plus, Canada) were driven to desperation from the counter-naval blockade by the kriegsmarine & the continuous attacks of the 'wolf packs', esp. during the initial WW2 years. can't locate the page now.
Sure, the Battle of the Atlantic was a big battle. Lethalforce claimed that the German Airforce sank 75% of the RN. Suspect a moderator of this defence forum doesn't know the difference between the Merchant Marine and the Navy.

And yes the Gurkha's, usually, are excellent soldiers.

@apple actually has fallen from the tree. You are basically a supreme class idiot - hopefully not a prime example of the Aussies, although the extreme weather of Finland might have frozen your brain, as the example of jouni goes.
Is nice summer weather in Finland at the moment.

Moron, read history first, learn the economics and history of railway in India, then comment.
I was being ironic, that would be another British thing you don't get.

Yes, they were humiliated at every front, and if Japs' attack on Pearl Harbour did not force US and its massive, untouched industrial workforce to plunge into WW2, Brits would have starved in their tiny island. It is the US involvement that saved the BRits, and at the end of WW2 the so called Empire was too weak to keep it intact and had become a yYes Sir' majordomo of USA.


http://www.naval-history.net/WW2aBritishLosses01BB.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Royal_Navy_losses_in_World_War_II

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Royal_Navy#Second_World_War

Apart from a few ships that Brits started with in WW2, including majority of Battleships, the RN received a huge blow and would have been incapable of going on except USA's help. The liberty class ships were RN's savious.
Is common for British people to consider WW2 their finest hour. Given the awesome history of Britain that's pretty impressive.

As to whether the Germans would have still lost if they hadn't declared war on America is hard to say, is an irrelevant point to raise, in my opinion.

Plenty of RN ships were sunk in WW2. What's your point? Lethalforce claimed the German airforce sank 75% of the British navy which is incredibly wrong.

Yeah, Gurkhas ran, Sikhs were cowards...yadda yadda yadda.....

In the history of Gurkhas for over 200 years no one has ever said that Gurkhas ran from their enemy. This two words singularly is what sums up your intellectual integrity. Btw, you really need to read up yourself :


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Army_during_World_War_II#Malaya_and_Singapore



Now, how did Aussies made up of 80% of casualties, when they are numbered so few and were placed in less risky places and later withdrew to Singapore and then surrendered.




^^^ That's the gallantry of Aussies in Battle of Malaya and Singapore. :lol: The General Benett was a Aussie - the prime example of Aussie intelligence and bravery.

You might have known, had you studied that all the surrendering were done by the white officers, as no Indian was in the command in any of the battle. The planning of battle and later surrendering, all were done by the Brits or their White-counterparts. The Indian National Army, recruited from already surrendered POWs, and no Indian soldier who were not taken POW, ever defected to INA.

But, then to accept the above points, and even learing of them requires intellectual honesty and integrity, which :no wonder: you sorely lack.
Australians were doing the fighting (and dying) in Malaya. Indian "soldiers" got out of the sight of British personnel, fired their guns in the air, and then ran away claiming the Japanese pushed them out of the defensive line.

I was being generous not mentioning the two time losers/ traitors of the Indian National "Army". Their existance isn't just a disgrace to India it's one of the worst stains on the dignity of the human race.

But since you bring them up, those scum were more deserving of a .303 between the eyes/ dangling from a noose than your average treason aXX-hole. Signed up for the army, wouldn't fight in Malaya and then joined one of histories most brutal, evil (an overused term but entirely consistent with the Imperial Japanese Army) organisations ever where they failed once again.

How India didn't take responsibility Bose's cowards and execute those seditious traitors escapes me and wasn't the new Indian Government's finest hour


Had UK not colonized us,we would have been surely colonized by even worse powers like Russia,Japan,Spain or Portugal.
Good point.

@CrYsIs - who carried out the genocide of aboriginal Australians?
Is a bit much to blame the British for that. That was pretty much Australia's fault. Although, there was no genocide for Australian Aboriginals.
 

CrYsIs

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
935
Likes
496
Country flag
@CrYsIs

You call Sashi Tharoor a British educated Anglophile, when I am inclined to agree despite his rather excellent speech, I see you are more of a British apologetic than anybody I have seen in this forum. Although, I do admit that you ae more in hate with Indians than in love with Britts.

Your every arguments speak volumes of your anglophilia.

99%sure india would have been colonized, Maratha couldn't control, India was lucky English came instead of French or japanese, Bengal famine an administrative failure, 3rd option for princely states... what fvck?!!!!!

If you are what if-ing, then couldn't you consider what if Siraj-ud-daula killed off Clive's forces and then Maratha defeated weakened Bengal Nawab? Or English and French battled it out, and then the weakened european forces got massacred by Marathas? Sikhs remained united and kicked English butt and formed a greater Punjab? The Maratha united India and led the forces against Britts and massacred them when getting weapon tech from French or Portugese?

You can go any length of fictional world to show your love for the Raj and rationalise its action. But, guess what, we are not buying what you are selling? May be you can get buyer in the leftist club?
I believe in rationalism and looking at things objectively.

There was no realistic chance of India escaping colonialism because as i said India was a prime property.. Thats is why just about every other colonial empire was trying their luck to capture India.
Had it not been for the British,India would certainly been annexed by other European powers.
 

apple

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
612
Likes
174
Listen pea brain

I did not mention one naval battle so fuck off
Of course you didn't mention a battle, because there was no battle and your claim is 0% true

75 percent of the British navy was decimated by German air strikes
If I'm, a person who doesn't lie and isn't a moron, have a pea brain how small is yours? A grain of rice brain?

Let's see if the people that liked your lie are either too stupid or too full of hate to recognise the truth; Mad Indian, Sakal Gharelu Ustad and pmaitra
 

apple

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
612
Likes
174
Is that the HMS Hood? Sunk by the Germany airforce was it? You're a pathetic clown.

Learn the difference between Navy and Merchant Marine, moderator of a Defence forum.

Even teaching you makes me feel more stupid. How dumb can you be Lethalforce? Surprise me
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,962
Likes
16,868
Country flag
I was being ironic, that would be another British thing you don't get.
You are a british? Never mentioned it before! Always claimed to be Ausiie. Whatever, Aussies are but a little toasted Britts anyway.

To come back to irony. I get irony perfectly fine. But, I guess you were trying to be sarcastic? huh? Well, guess what, it was not humorous, and given the depth of knowledge you have exhibited throughout and in the very post, it was difficult to understand whether you actually might be believing what you are writing.


Is common for British people to consider WW2 their finest hour. Given the awesome history of Britain that's pretty impressive.
Duh? Really? But then, I guess, when for the first time in history one gets to be in the winning side when actually fighting a foe who are more evil than you, then that part becomes really bright than all the evil deeds you have done in the past. Also, given that was the last time the Brits get to stand with the victors, and the same is unlikely to ever happen, and also the event being the most recent compared to other big ass wars, no wonder the Brits think that.
As to whether the Germans would have still lost if they hadn't declared war on America is hard to say, is an irrelevant point to raise, in my opinion.
Not so in my opinion, as this emphasizes @LETHALFORCE 's point of humiliation. W/o USA, England would have lost, and that is a simple fact.
Plenty of RN ships were sunk in WW2. What's your point? Lethalforce claimed the German airforce sank 75% of the British navy which is incredibly wrong.
Well, I am not good with nos (actually lazy to do the math). But over 350 major ships of war lost in the WW2 by the Brits alone. I would not be surprised if @LETHALFORCE is not far off the mark

Australians were doing the fighting (and dying) in Malaya. Indian "soldiers" got out of the sight of British personnel, fired their guns in the air, and then ran away claiming the Japanese pushed them out of the defensive line.
And, that you have learnt how? You were there yourself I guess? When you make such outlandish claim, do provide a link, except some hearsay. The bit of history I have read, as of course the battle of Malay and Singapore is not something I care for, I see that over 14000 Aussies were taken POW of a single Division that was there in the theatre. How much hard fight did you Aussies give that you barely receive casualties? And, with such super soldiers, how come the Generals surrendered?

The Indians fired in the sky and ran away claiming ....... what kind of moron can say something like that? Either a brainwashed Paki, which hopefully you are not, or a fvckhead who lives in a fictional land and takes out fictional arguments out off hats when it suits him. I would say, you are the later kind. You need to give a link/a source for your outlandish claims, moron.

I was being generous not mentioning the two time losers/ traitors of the Indian National "Army". Their existance isn't just a disgrace to India it's one of the worst stains on the dignity of the human race.

But since you bring them up, those scum were more deserving of a .303 between the eyes/ dangling from a noose than your average treason aXX-hole. Signed up for the army, wouldn't fight in Malaya and then joined one of histories most brutal, evil (an overused term but entirely consistent with the Imperial Japanese Army) organisations ever where they failed once again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_National_Army#1944 ... read up. INA was winning till Japs lstarted losing the war. And, ironically it was the Indians in Royal Indian Army, supplied from India who held them back and pushed them out, as INA and Japs' supply line was cut, and guess what the US offensive at pacific region forced Japs to call back as much resources as it could to stem the tide of the battle.

Actually, the whole nation of Australia is a disgrace to the human race. So, no wonder they are unable to understand something called patriotism. Every single soldier of INA were patriotic Indian who were more of men than your whole racist genocidal white-assed nation can ever hope to be.

I don't see Japs as evil, as my forefathers witnessed the evil of Brits where they starved 4 million people to death, taking food from those unfortunates' home to feed other whites.

How India didn't take responsibility Bose's cowards and execute those seditious traitors escapes me and wasn't the new Indian Government's finest hour
Actually, how Indian soldiers stood by and let the traitorous compromised leadership of Indian National Congress let the Brits devide their own nation and then take off without massacring every last one of them is what I don't understand. not the finest hour for Indian Army.

Good point.
Of course it is a good point to you. Getting a anglophile among not so appreciable of Brits, is a great find for you.

Is a bit much to blame the British for that. That was pretty much Australia's fault. Although, there was no genocide for Australian Aboriginals.
True. But then Aussies are but Brits in a newer scorched skin! They still bend down for the Queen of Britain, don't they? Btw, we can read and we have internet.

You may need to read ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_of_Indigenous_Australians

And your brethren in America, mostly with British roots did this.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genoc...ed_States_colonization_and_westward_expansion
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,599
Country flag
SEEMS LIKE A LARGE FIGURE ??

https://sites.google.com/site/muslimholocaustmuslimgenocide/indian-holocaust


INDIAN HOLOCAUST under British Raj: 1.8 BILLION excess deaths (350 million Muslim), IGNORED by Anglo media


Educated Indians are aware of the ghastly 2-century imposition of British colonialism on India. However, because history is generally written by non-scientists, most Indians are utterly unaware of the horrendous human cost (1.8 billion violent and non-violent avoidable deaths in the period 1757-1947).
The “avoidable deaths” (from violence, deprivation and deprivation-exacerbated disease) in British India totalled 1.5 billion (or 1.8 billion if you include the so-called Native States). About 20% of the victims (about 350 million) were Muslims.
For a recent account see that reproduced below by DrDr H Gideon Polya, “Racist White Australian ABC media giant ignores Indian Holocaust, Bengali Holocausts & Climate Genocide"
, Sulekha, 15 April 2009: http://gideon.sulekha.com/blog/post/2009/04/racist-white-australian-abc-media-giant-ignores-indian.htm .
Dr Gideon Polya (2009): "I am a 4-decade career research scientist (and still giving theory and laboratory courses to second year university science students at a leading Australian university). I have addressed this British carnage in India in a quantitative fashion, using the parameter of “avoidable death” (excess death, avoidable mortality, excess mortality, untimely death, deaths that should not have happened) which is defined as the difference between the actual deaths in a country and the deaths expected for a pweaceful, decently run country with the same demographics (see my book “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950”, G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://mwcnews.net/Gideon-Polya and http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/ ).
The “avoidable deaths” (from violence, deprivation and deprivation-exacerbated disease) in British India totalled 1.5 billion (or 1.8 billion if you include the so-called Native States).

Major British-imposed genocidal events in India included the Great Bengal Famine (10 million dead, 1769-1770), successive famines that killed scores of millions of Indians up to the World War 2 Bengal Famine (6-7 million dead in Bengal and surrounding provinces; see the recent BBC broadcast involving me, Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Amartya Sen and others: http://www.open2.net/thingsweforgot/bengalfamine_programme.html ), the estimated 10 million Indians murdered by the British in reprisals for the so-called Indian Mutiny (in which 2,000 British were killed) and the underlying British-imposed condition of “living on the edge” that was responsible for most of the “avoidable deaths” (see my book “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History. Colonial rapacity, holocaust denial and the crisis in biological sustainability”, G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 1998, 2008: http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/ ).
A cogent summary has been given by outstanding Indian ecofeminist and physicist Dr Vandana Shiva (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandana_Shiva ) : “The British created a group of owners of land who would then be the rent collectors, who would then finance the empire and meantime people were losing their land. And this had simultaneous impact on hunger because if all your surplus is being extracted to pay taxes then the very producers of food go hungry, which is why 2 million people [6-7 million] died in the Bengal famine of 1942 [1943-1945]. Not because there wasn’t enough rice in India — we were exporting rice for the war — but because of the way the free trade rights of commerce were higher than the rights of people to eat. And the entire force of the British empire was being used to extract the last amount of paddy from the peasants” (see Dr Vandana Shiva, “Colonisation and Independence”: http://www.abc.net.au/specials/shiva/pg04.htm ) .
Even mass murderer and Indian-hater Winston Churchill who deliberately starved 6-7 million Indians to death in the World War 2 Bengal Famine (see “Media lying over Churchill’s crimes. British Indian Holocaust: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/26713/42/ and “Anglo holocaust commission, ignore and denial. Churchill’s crimes from Indian Holocaust to Palestinian Genocide“: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/28002/42/ ) confessed to this “living on the edge” reality for Indians under the British back in 1935 in a speech to the UK House of Commons: “In the standard of life they have nothing to spare. The slightest fall from the present standard of life in India means slow starvation, and the actual squeezing out of life, not only of millions but of scores of millions of people, who have come into the world at your invitation and under the shield and protection of British power” (see Chapter 14, “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History. Colonial rapacity, holocaust denial and the crisis in biological sustainability”, G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 1998, 2008: http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/ ).
History ignored yields history repeated and the continuing horrendous carnage of 16 million global avoidable deaths annually (3.7 million in India alone, 5.3 million in South Asia) still stalks the world due to violence, deprivation, disease and LYING. Just as the British Mainstream has largely deleted British atrocities in India out of history books and public consciousness, so Western Mainstream media, politician and academic lying about current Western atrocities in the Occupied Palestinina, Iraqi and Afghan Territories ensures their horrendous continuance.
Racist White Australia was a loyal, racist, “white” part of the racist British Empire and is now a loyal associate of the “politically correct racist” (PC racist) US Empire (that mass murders Asians while pretending that it is bringing them “democracy”) .

The racist White Australian Mainstream Establishment is remorselessly (albeit secretly) committed to a sustained policy of complicity in US-imposed genocides coupled with holocaust ignoring and holocaust denial.
The following self-explanatory letter about the Indian Holocaust, Climate Genocide and Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) holocaust denial has been sent to media, MPs and to the Australian taxpayer-funded ABC, unfortunately the best of the awful Mainstream media in Australia, the Land of Flies, Lies and Slies (spin-based untruths). The silence has been deafening.
Dear Sir/Madam,
In the 1943-1945 Bengal Famine 6-7 million Indians were deliberately starved to death by the British in British-occupied India in a forgotten Bengali Holocaust that occurred at the same time as the Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million dead, 1 in 6 dying from deprivation) that was part of a wider but forgotten WW2 European Holocaust in general (30 million Slav, Jewish and Roma dead). [1]
Yet a search of over 3 million pages of the Australian taxpayer-funded Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) records reveals only 4 ABC broadcast references to the “Bengal Famine” and due to Dr Gideon Polya (2), Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Amartya Sen (1) and ecofeminist physicist Dr Vandana Shiva (1), respectively – whereas a search for “Holocaust” reveals 25 ABC broadcast references to the Jewish Holocaust in the first few months of 2009 alone. [2]
Indeed there are zero (0) ABC broadcast references elicited by Searches of the following binomial terms in quotes for past, present and future atrocities in which Australia has been/is variously complicit (violent and non-violent excess deaths in millions in parentheses): Palestinian Holocaust, Palestinian Genocide (0.3 million, 1967-2009), Iraqi Holocaust, Iraqi Genocide (4.1 million, 1990-2009, 2.3 million 2003-2009), Afghan Holocaust, Afghan Genocide (3-7 million, 2001-2009), Bengali Holocaust (10 million, 1769-1770; 6-7 million, 1943-1945; 3 million, 1971), Indian Holocaust (1.8 billion, 1757-1947), Muslim Holocaust (0.4 billion, 1950-2009) and (prospective) Climate Genocide (10 billion globally, 2 billion Indians this century due to unaddressed, man-made global warming) – indeed there are only 3 ABC broadcast references to “Aboriginal Genocide” (circa 2 million, 1788 onwards; 9,000 annually) . [3]
Any holocaust denial is repugnant and is also dangerous because “history ignored yields history repeated”. The appalling Australian ABC record of dishonest, racist and unethical holocaust denial demands urgent exposure and redress – Australian holocaust denial threatens Australia, the Developing World and the Planet. [4]
Yours sincerely,
Dr Gideon Polya, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
[1]. “Bengal Famine”, BBC Radio 4 broadcast (with Dr Gideon Polya, Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Amartya Sen and other scholars), 4 January 2008: http://www.open2.net/thingsweforgot/bengalfamine_programme.html ; Gideon Polya “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History. Colonial rapacity, holocaust denial and the crisis in biological sustainability”, G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 1998, 2008: http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/ .
[2]. ABC Search of 3 million documents for “climate genocide”: http://search.abc.net.au/search/search.cgi?form=simple&num_ranks=20&collection=abcall&query=%22climate+genocide%22 .
[3]. Gideon Polya “Australia’s secret genocide history. La Trobe, “Bundoora Eucalyptus” and black crimes of White Australia”, MWC News, 2008: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/22128/42/ ; Gideon Polya, “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” , G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://mwcnews.net/Gideon-Polya and http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/ ); Gideon Polya, “Aboriginal Genocide. Racist White Australian child abuse and passive mass murder”, MWC News, 2007: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/15140/42/
[4]. Gideon Polya, “Climate Disruption, Climate Emergency, Climate Genocide & Penultimate Bengali Holocaust through Sea Level Rise “, Yarra Valley Climate Action Group, 2009: http://sites.google.com/site/yarravalleyclimateactiongroup/climate-disruption-climate-emergency-climate-genocide-penultimate-bengali-holocaust-through-sea-level-rise .
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top