Pakistan's Nuclear Artillery?

[Yusuf]

Only a wiki article in the Kirana hills cold test and referencing a Pak site. Just one reference. No other newspaper report nothing.

 

[Yusuf]

beside this as per Indian nuclear scientist pokhran 2 test failed

so until and unless India test nukes again for me Indian warhead design is still the French borrowed in 70's

Well you are right. We have only duds. Pakistans nuke program is way too advanced and like you joked I mean said Pak has 1000 warheads. Really you send shivers down my spine.

 

[Decklander]

while i heard that it was Pakistan too serious with using nukes

though because of India usa interfered

farhaan, you seem to be totally misread and seem devoid of logical thinking.
You tested nukes in end May 1998. kargil happened in 1999. Why did India not get threatened by your nukes and went ahead to attack your army in Kargill?
LOC os disputed area so why did you not use nuke threat to remain in occupation of those hills?
Why did Nawaz rush to US on the Independence day of US if they were serious about using nukes?
What caused nawaz to accept all terms of ceasefire immidiatly as set for by PM Chaarpayee of India?
If India was scared wud India force terms on Pak for ceasefire?
Pls search youtube and statements of Nawaz you will know that PA was shit scared of the IA launching second phase and full fledged assault across international border to dismember Pakistan which forced you generals and PM to beg infront of USA.
Kargil War : In the eyes of an eminent Pakistani Journalist, Mr. Najam Sethi - YouTube
Pak lost 2,700 troops during Kargil conflict: Nawaz Sharif - World - DNA

Read from page 9th onwards of this
http://wws.princeton.edu/research/cases/Bisaria2-09.pdf

 

[spikey360]

It is our ironwill that we will dismember and liquidate Pakistan. We will either do it or die in the attempt.

Keep the :bs: coming farhan.

 

[Decklander]

Pak army is the best army in the world. They can murder any POW with ease. They have never won a battle ever whether it was 1947-48, 1965, 1971 or 1999 or even against Afgans.
IA never went to lahore and circled sialkot in 1965. Bangladesh is not a nation on earth. Kargil is occupied by PA and they have over 1000 nukes which they can just take out from their pockets and destroy India. BUT PA is very benevolent they do not want to hurt flies like India.
We are humbled and thank them for being so merciful.

 

[Yusuf]

Pak army is the best army in the world. They can murder any POW with ease. They have never won a battle ever whether it was 1947-48, 1965, 1971 or 1999 or even against Afgans.
IA never went to lahore and circled sialkot in 1965. Bangladesh is not a nation on earth. Kargil is occupied by PA and they have over 1000 nukes which they can just take out from their pockets and destroy India. BUT PA is very benevolent they do not want to hurt flies like India.
We are humbled and thank them for being so merciful.

Come on Captain, don't lose your cool with fanboys.

 

[farhan_9909]

Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Program - Development

 

[LETHALFORCE]

This whole Pakistani nuclear program will be a waste of money when India's BMD is in place.

 

[farhan_9909]

http://www.-----------/forums/pakis...ry-real-father-pakistans-nuclear-progarm.html

a good article about pak nuclear Program father of why is a metallurgical engineer and thief is considered father of pak nuclear Program when the centrifuge was not even used in public nukes test

 

[Decklander]

This whole Pakistani nuclear program will be a waste of money when India's BMD is in place.

Our BMD will do to Pak what space based weapons development did to USSR. They will just go bankrupt making more missiles and bombs to counter the BMD.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

Exactly Sir, when your weapons cannot reach the enemy, and the enemy can annihilate you
it is a wake up call.

 

[Decklander]

http://www.-----------/forums/pakis...ry-real-father-pakistans-nuclear-progarm.html

a good article about pak nuclear Program father of why is a metallurgical engineer and thief is considered father of pak nuclear Program when the centrifuge was not even used in public nukes test

Now you are speaking the truth. You enrich uranium and have no Plutonium making ability till 2004. But in 1998 you test a plutonium device. Where did that plutonium and device come from????

Your Uranium device never worked.

 

[sayareakd]

Now you are speaking the truth. You enrich uranium and have no Plutonium making ability till 2004. But in 1998 you test a plutonium device. Where did that plutonium and device come from????

Your Uranium device never worked.

sir their nukes never worked therefore this famous pic,

his face say it all (it failed big time), while others were putting Chinese nukes, he was sidelined, house arrested and even made to admit on TV.

 

[Yusuf]

India will definitely look at making a counter to Nasr. India will have BMD. India will make more nukes that keeps in mind China and Pakis will bleed making even more bombs, even more missiles and spend even more securing it.

Last time a country did all that, it broke into several nations.

 

[farhan_9909]

Now you are speaking the truth. You enrich uranium and have no Plutonium making ability till 2004. But in 1998 you test a plutonium device. Where did that plutonium and device come from????

Your Uranium device never worked.

had written a bigger Reply about pak plutonium PRODUCTION since 1981 with the intro of new labs at parr 2 reactor site

and than the intro of khushab reactor in 1996 which that time had capacity of 14kg plutonium per year
now we have 4 such reactor

Pakistan is producing plutonium since 1981 when didNt had even knowledge of What plutonium is

now plz search about Pakistan nuclear fuel complex as well

to be completed in the next 6 months

 

[Decklander]

had written a bigger Reply about pak plutonium PRODUCTION since 1981 with the intro of new labs at parr 2 reactor site

and than the intro of khushab reactor in 1996 which that time had capacity of 14kg plutonium per year
now we have 4 such reactor

Pakistan is producing plutonium since 1981 when didNt had even knowledge of What plutonium is

now plz search about Pakistan nuclear fuel complex as well

to be completed in the next 6 months

Do you know how much uranium is produced after a nuke reaction and how many years it takes to be able to reprocess that fuel to make Plutonium?
I knew you will post this shit here. Khusab did not start reprocessing till 2004. It was china which helped you to learn the tricks of reprocessing spent fuel to make Plutonium. Your first ever Plutonium was made in 2004. You had no Putonium in 1998.

 

[Yusuf]

Do you know how much uranium is produced after a nuke reaction and how many years it takes to be able to reprocess that fuel to make Plutonium?
I knew you will post this shit here. Khusab did not start reprocessing till 2004. It was china which helped you to learn the tricks of reprocessing spent fuel to make Plutonium. Your first ever Plutonium was made in 2004. You had no Putonium in 1998.

Even if we hold him to his quoted numbers, 14x4=56. Processing losses. Machining losses. And given the level of Pak sophistication or the lack of it, at least 10kg of Pu per warhead if not more. So they can produce only 2 warheads a year based on Pu. That too primitive 12kt yield.

 

[farhan_9909]

Do you know how much uranium is produced after a nuke reaction and how many years it takes to be able to reprocess that fuel to make Plutonium?
I knew you will post this shit here. Khusab did not start reprocessing till 2004. It was china which helped you to learn the tricks of reprocessing spent fuel to make Plutonium. Your first ever Plutonium was made in 2004. You had no Putonium in 1998.

as expected you didNt searched about the parr series reactor

New-Laboratories)

Unlike the PARR-I and PARR-II, New Labs, PINSTECH, is not subject to IAEA inspections and is completely different from its parent reactors. New Laboratories is a plutonium-weapons-grade fuel and plutonium reprocessing plant, known as "New Labs". It is a pilot 94Pu reprocessing reactor, has a capability to utilize the ~7% 239Pu and has the capability to handle the isotopes and utilize the 86Kr emissions and radiation.[9] A reprocessing reactor for the plutonium fuel to utilize <~7% 239Pu weapons grade fuel into a much heavier but <~7% weapon-grade 240Pu weapons grade fuel.[10] New Labs were designed and constructed indigenously by PAEC under its Chairman Munir Ahmad Khan whereas it project-director was a mechanical engineer, Chaudhry Abdul Majeed. The construction of the facility was led by NESPAK.

The plant was completed in 1981 and cold reprocessing tests for producing plutonium took place at New Labs in 1986. The New Labs came into limelight when Pakistan had secretly tested its plutonium weapon-based nuclear device in Kirana Hills.[13] On May 30, 1999, the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission's scientists, under renowned nuclear physicist Dr. Samar Mubarakmand, had tested a miniaturized nuclear device that is believed to be a Plutonium devices for which plutonium was most likely reprocessed by the Pakistani scientists into weapon-grade at the New Labs, PINSTECH. The test yield of a nuclear devices was reported to be 12-40 Kt.

Pakistan Atomic Research Reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[farhan_9909]

Even if we hold him to his quoted numbers, 14x4=56. Processing losses. Machining losses. And given the level of Pak sophistication or the lack of it, at least 10kg of Pu per warhead if not more. So they can produce only 2 warheads a year based on Pu. That too primitive 12kt yield.

initial capacity beside this we didNt had any local uranium mine back than
the rest of reactors capacity would not be the sam

 

[Yusuf]

initial capacity beside this we didNt had any local uranium mine back than
the rest of reactors capacity would not be the sam

You have no clue about how much fissile material is required to make a bomb. Wha goes into utilizing fissile material to make the bomb.

@LETHALFORCE already showed how much fissile material India has whih can be converted to warheads. You guys are nowhere near competing with India for numbers. That India chooses to keep 100 warheads ( I dispute that) then its India which is keeping it at that number by choice. If india decides to play the numbers game, it will be game over for Pak.

Your govt has to realize the folly of pursuing a mindless nuclear race which it stands no chance of winning.

India in the 2000 has enough fissile material to make hundreds of bombs.
Read what David Albright has to say.