INS Vishal (IAC- II) Aircraft Carrier

Discussion in 'Indian Navy' started by john70, Aug 21, 2012.

  1. darshan978

    darshan978 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2017
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    563
    Nuclear propulsion still gives edge over conventional.
    You can take more food, and ammo instead of carrying tons of fuel in case of nuclear aircraft carriers...
     
  2. IndianHawk

    IndianHawk Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2016
    Messages:
    2,548
    Likes Received:
    3,996
    We need much more details to make that comparison. Going by Wikipedia nuclear Charles de Gaulle has same endurance of 45 days ( limited by food and fuel for aircrafts) as that of conventional vikramaditya. Of course Wikipedia is not the accurate source. So we need more information.

    Meanwhile keep in mind that nuclear propulsion requires far more safety systems than conventional. These systems might end up taking equal space as that the carrier fuel will take.

    Sent from my C103 using Tapatalk
     
  3. Mikesingh

    Mikesingh Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    5,205
    Likes Received:
    15,708
    Location:
    Tora Bora
    45 days is not quite correct. An AC never sails alone but is supported by a strike grouping. A Carrier Strike Group (CSG) has a combined ammunition, oiler and supply ship (AOE/AOR), that provides fleet logistics support for up to 100 days to the CSG. However, it is less in active battle scenarios.

    Even a nuclear propelled AC needs frequent replenishment, and so do nuclear subs which need to surface fairly often for the purpose, mainly for supplies, water, toiletries and so on.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2019
    uoftotaku likes this.

Share This Page