Gessler
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
- Messages
- 2,308
- Likes
- 11,208
F-18 might be the perfect balance between cost & quality, but buying Rafales in several smaller batches makes most sense.
That at we'll get Rafales F4, F5, F6 etc.
Look at our Su-30s, even the ones being made now are of same 2001 standard!!!
The F/A-18E/F (let alone the more advanced variant offered for the competition) is not that much cheaper than Rafale.No way is Mig-35!
Just Google up the glaring issues both IAF & IN has had with Mig-29, Mig-29K, Mig-35 (during MMRCA trials). Not to mention being underpowered, unreliable, low availablity (30%!!!), low quality tech & high operating cost.
If they are going cost effective than it could be F-18 SH, which has much lower buying cost than Rafales & much lower operating/maintanence cost than Mig-35.
But most probably there'd be Rafale in multiple small batches...
But the thing is, we cannot & should not be operating half a dozen types of fighters all doing the same roles, it makes no practical or logistical sense to do so - we'd be right back at square one, just like when we were buying MiG-27s, MiG-29s and Mirage-2000s at the same time (arguably the decision that effed up IAF's fighter procurement).
It makes far more sense to bring in economies of scale and logistical commonality...that will ensure you end up saving more money in long run (in terms of infrastructure, training, and maintenance), more than you'll possibly save by buying a 2nd type of fighter in the same class that's slightly less expensive than the first.