it will take years before all the crew can land and get use to carrier operations.
=====================================================
I love the sour grape from you.read it on news paper that one of the engineer died at the time of landing of first aircraft.
Landing of Aircraft in carrier is old WW-2 tech, you guys should ease up and take your time. Effective carrier operations will take 2-5 years.
Remember Japan lost WW-2 despite having carrier to support their war effort.
Josh ma hosh mat khona.
Landing in AC is nothing new, we are doing it for years and others are also doing this. BTW Vikram. has already had carrier landing. Just because it was delayed, due to problem found in the boiler, does not mean that we wont have it in future.I love the sour grape from you.
Let me correct some of the errors you made:
It was the CEO of SAC who died. SAC is the company who made the J-15, J-31 etc.
Landing of aircraft on a carrier has never been an old ww-2 tech. It is about skills, training and hardwares.
You must be really bored since your russian AC got delayed again.
Piloting an aircraft and landing it on an AC. though being risky and complicated, could be accomplished through pratices. therefore landing on AC Liaoning alone is no big deal.Landing in AC is nothing new, we are doing it for years and others are also doing this. BTW Vikram. has already had carrier landing. Just because it was delayed, due to problem found in the boiler, does not mean that we wont have it in future.
BTW it is quite funny that China has first inducted their AC and then after formal induction they started processes of landing of aircraft. What if problem is found at this stage it will delay this inducted carrier's future operation in the PLA Navy.
dont you guys (CHina and Pak) first complete all the test and then induct the equipment into armed forces. I remember that Junk Fighter-17 was also first inducted before weaponistaion testing. Its regular pilots were flying them all over the Pakistan. As a result one of the plane crashed.
Landing in AC is nothing new, we are doing it for years and others are also doing this. BTW Vikram. has already had carrier landing. Just because it was delayed, due to problem found in the boiler, does not mean that we wont have it in future.
BTW it is quite funny that China has first inducted their AC and then after formal induction they started processes of landing of aircraft. What if problem is found at this stage it will delay this inducted carrier's future operation in the PLA Navy.
dont you guys (CHina and Pak) first complete all the test and then induct the equipment into armed forces. I remember that Junk Fighter-17 was also first inducted before weaponistaion testing. Its regular pilots were flying them all over the Pakistan. As a result one of the plane crashed.
It was not inducted in Indian navy or else it would have called INS Arihant. It is only called "Arihant". Please apply some mind to this.Didn't you guys lunch your first nuclear submarine a couple of years ago but its nuclear reactor is not operational till now?
2: We know the Americans will not train the Chinese for this and I cannot think of a country that has expertise in AC who would train them. So from where did they get this knowledge, please don't tell me they reversed engineered this is through videos short on American carrier...
but that doesn't change the scenerio,does it?the IN has operated aircraft carriers for the last 5 decades,so its quite natural that we will have clear cut advantages over PLAN in this field!and regarding the usage of foreign aircraft carriers and aircrafts well as the saying goes "everything is fair in love and war"!i mean as long as these foriegn eqipments serve our country effectively we don't have a problem with them!Piloting an aircraft and landing it on an AC. though being risky and complicated, could be accomplished through pratices. therefore landing on AC Liaoning alone is no big deal.
However, what set Chinese landing apart from the landing by Indians is that Chinese pilots landed Chinese-built aircrafts on a Chinese-rebuilt AC while Indian pilots landed whoever-built-but-Indian-built aircrafts on a whoever-built-but-Indian-built AC. Apologies for my awful English syntax,but you people can understand what I was trying to convey.
but we still have an operational INS Viraat don't we!on the other hand your aircraft carrier/floating casino Varyag is still doing sea trials!well it seems that the PLAN is quite happy with its first floating casino!I love the sour grape from you.
Let me correct some of the errors you made:
It was the CEO of SAC who died. SAC is the company who made the J-15, J-31 etc.
Landing of aircraft on a carrier has never been an old ww-2 tech. It is about skills, training and hardwares.
You must be really bored since your russian AC got delayed again.
1.well, landing one jet on AC is much harder than landing a WWII old plane on AC,because jets are much more heavier and faster.read it on news paper that one of the engineer died at the time of landing of first aircraft.
Landing of Aircraft in carrier is old WW-2 tech, you guys should ease up and take your time. Effective carrier operations will take 2-5 years.
Remember Japan lost WW-2 despite having carrier to support their war effort.
Josh ma hosh mat khona.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PLAN CG of Liaoning (Varyag) in action. | China | 0 | ||
India's K-15 Ballasic Missile tasked to take out China's Aircraft Carrier 'Liaoning' | Strategic Forces | 50 | ||
Taiwan's new stealth corvette designed to blind Liaoning | Naval Warfare | 10 | ||
F-35 is Liaoning's worst nightmare: Global Times | China | 0 |