Search results

Yeah, A society fights for their freedom and you label them terrorists. Free Northern Ireland and go back english scum.

Internet clown throwing his digital white glove. how mature indeed.

Apology for what? Should I also send you some paper napkins and a maid to wipe your tears? There are very few on here who ensure that arrogant [edited] are shown their place. You showed your true colors within a few hours of signing up. And now you want to play victim? Weak ...

Scalie got laid off? Wife kicked you out? Bed ridden after a bust up at the bar? You can tell us scalie, we're family here.

Thats your comeback? C'mon at least put up a fight. Keep me in shape. This is plane weak. :pound:

Scalie it gives me great pleasure in making you look stupid again. a small matter with the fix you did with Messiah's spelling. The correct way to spell it would be illiterate. I told ya i'l whack ya. Stay in line or the straight jacket comes out next.

Ok, I will attempt to cure your ignorance. India during the Vedic age - 1500 - 500 BC. Around 350 BCE Around 250 BCE Around 200 AD 850 AD The Mughal Empire 1700 AD The Maratha Empire 1750 AD And then after 100 years of the East India Company Anyone with half a brain...

Why would it be worse? Have you seen the map of Europe? Do you know how well nation states thrive? How many schools exactly did the British setup to drive literacy? They we governing the country right? I think you must not try to build a hypothesis that assumes that things would have been...

Again, when did I use superlatives when quoting you? I countered your arguments and you dismissed them as points of view. I debate based on data. Would you like to see the economic situation of this place that we call India over the last 2000 years as estimated by experts? I am sure you already...

Stop right there is an interjection. If that offends you, I should not be debating with you.

what part of the post did you find uncivil?

STOP RIGHT THERE I don't know whether india would have been one nation or many nation states like europe, if they never came here. I could not care less anyway. but when you start of with the whole railways and roads thing, its the equivalent of pissing on our past. before the brits got here...

I dont keep posting about them. Never have. You are insignificant and thats why I am not even on that forum. Your accusation of keep on posting about them does not hold any water at all. Stop playing stupid. May work with high school dropouts in the UK. Not here.

Examples are what I asked when you accused me of things that werent substantiated either. I rest my case. Oracle, sorry if that offended you, I speak for myself. I dont represent India.

Scalie, you epitomize the stereotypes of today's Britain. Sulking, pained, defensive, deceitful, still clinging on to what used to be and failing to come to terms with the reality around you. It pleases me and many others immensely that Britishers are synonymous with these attributes. Good day.

You accused me of something that you just couldnt prove. You are a simple liar. And thats not even name calling. You should claim victory now as i stop right here.

If I gave a shit about it, I would. The fact that I did not is enough to back my stance that you are insignificant and not worthy of my time. I suggested instead to my minions to post it there to get all the rabid pink nosed nationalists foaming at the teeth.

So you cant find even a single instance where 'I keep posting about them'. adorning your posts with stale idioms wont help you here. I reiterate, the 50 million living on that tiny island is of no significance to me. I dont feel the need to talk or debate about them or with them. You must stop...

This was what you said in post number 148 What specific instances can you recollect that allowed you to reconcile to the notion that I keep posting about them? Or did you just pull that out of your hat?

show me where I keep posting about brits. dont be evasive with your response.