quite appeasing to hear.any source or statistics,atleast from your mind?what will the response from people of telangana??---no idea--get an idea
Gandhinagar was built practically from the ground-up in 1970. It is an example of a bare-bones capital, which today has less than 197,000 residents (less than half the population of today's Rajahmundry). Gandhinagar governs a state of over 60 million residents (which is higher than the 50 million population of Seemandhra).
sorry to say this tarun your comments are ill detailed.uranium goes to central govt control,though lands belong to state.rare earths in rayalaseema-central govt. will be eager to hear your knowledge.
Last I checked, the centre can contract the task of mining natural resources, and it generates employment and revenue for the state where these resources are extracted from. Bihar's politicians blame practically every economic problem to "losing out natural resources to Jharkhand."
building a capital anywhere is expensive.
If Seemandhra can retrofit Vizag to become a state capital, and yet go on to appease Rayalaseema, then it's the most cost-effective solution, however, looking at some of the comments people like JC Diwakar, TGV, and Byrreddy are making, such a solution won't satisfy them.
first time i am hearing a concept like "bare-bone"capital.
Here's a bare-bones capital, less than 178 km² in area (smaller than Kakinada in area), with less than 197,000 population (less than half the population of Rajahmundry).
Before you come up with another of your witless comments stating that there are smaller state capitals, the reason Gandhinagar is an important example, is because it governs a state with over 60 million population, and 196,024 km² (both area and population higher than Seemandhra region's area and population).
so exactly how many govt.division have to be set up in vizag to make it par with capital,leaving beside manpower
It needs those institutions that people don't have to travel 400 km for. A high-court bench is definitely one of them.
guys please post some thing practical to current economy
United AP is not practical to current economy. You simply can't run a state in which 40 percent of its population doesn't want to be a part of that state, and is willing to do anything to achieve statehood. You can't run a state in which state employees can't get along with each other, every minor quarrel escalates into major conflict, and so on. So the sooner AP is bifurcated, the sooner you can kill United AP agitation, and force that region to get back to work. After the process of bifurcation is complete, United AP protests would serve no purpose. They're already serving no purpose. Every week you have someone high up in New Delhi reiterating to you people that the decision to create Telangana is irreversible. Your protests are achieving nothing.