Welcome
Regular Member
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2010
- Messages
- 197
- Likes
- 68
What Pakistan has poverty??????
What Pakistan has poverty??????
Are you edited insane?Blah...Blah...Blah. Moving 5% of your population out of poverty in one decade means it will be 2050 before 60-70% of the population are middle-class - maybe be a start, but it is no stellar achievement.
You can make up all the excuses you want about India starting later than China and the economy opening up in last 20 years, and all that.
But the fact of the matter remains that India has been independent for more than 60 years.
All I said was that Indians should not laugh at poverty in Pakistan when probably half the Indian people are still surviving on less than 2 bucks a day. It just makes us look stupid !!
BTW: Kerala may completely deindustrialized and one of the worst performing states in India from the standpoint of industrial production.
Agreed, no debate there. But you dont know Kerala as well as I do. Kerala's entire economy is based on foreign remittances - and that is how people in Kerala live better than most states in India. Almost every single family has someone or multiple people working abroad and sending home money, mine included. Nobody is sitting on their asses, and waiting for the CPI/M or Congress babus at state government to change their fortunes.
Why, because we have a billion plus people? By any, and every, indicator of development, India scores ahead of Pakistan. Per capita income in Pakistan actually declined in 2008-09, while it has more than doubled in India in the last 7 years. And is expected to double again in under nine. That is the real tragedy, that is poverty in Pakistan!i guess poverty in india is worst than pakistan.
" The Chinese industrialization in the 1970's was a direct product of the Sino-Soviet split that institutionalized in their memory, and most proximately of the death of Mao. "
WTF are you talking about. You cant even string a straight sentence together. "Institutionalized in their memory".......my foot !!
China transformation was because they had one terrific leader named Deng Xioping who was smart enough, pragmatic enough to realize that the traditional socialist economic was a pathetic waste of time. Deng was probably one of the best leaders China has ever had. The relationship with the Soviets had nothing to do with Deng decision to move towards toward a capitalist economic model. Simply put - he wasnt hung up on ideology, and was focussed on results. The rest is history.
You can say whatever you want about Kerala - but I would take Trivandrum or Cochin anyday over a polluted filthy shit-hole cities like Mumbai.
And I am willing to bet that the countryside in Kerala in way better than most other parts of rural India. And the roads are not too bad either.
Heck, they may even have better roads than some places in California.
@Rage........ You seem to have an serious "anal fixation". It comes out whenever you get overly excited. Please, try to keep your homo-erotic fantasies to yourself. We dont need to hear it on DFI.
Also, you seem to completely lose it on this forum. You provide us with a lot of humor - your idiotic phrases like "industrial catalyzation" . I'm sure it came from your political science class.....huh.
You must have had an English teacher who told you early on that putting as many big words and creating convoluted phrases, makes for "good english". Good Luck with that......and Oh.....you're a big China expert because you have studied Chinese economy in detail.
Well I just lived with Chinese all my life, and I have spent the last 25 years of my life here in the US working with Chinese from all parts of Mainland China. I guess that doesnt count for squat.....right
You just get funnier all the time.......keep it up....China expert. Hey there are a lot of Dumb Mallus here in Silicon-valley. I guess all the rocket scientists are in Mumbai.Oh, so I see for a lack of argument, you make a completely ad-hominem post <not withstanding my partially ad-hominem post, that took your 'argument to the cleaners, before>.
"Anal-fixation"? Are you trying to impute that to me, because you're a secretly homo-erotic, closet fanouk? Is that why you make stupid posts all the time, so that you can get "anal-whipped"?
"Industrial catalyzation" is an economic word, you dumb mallu Yank. Maybe if you actually got an education, instead of relying on the '99% literacy rate' credentials of your state, you'd be able to present a logically correct, cogent argument some of the time. Do I need to break that down for you? my retarded brejjen from the South?
You've 'lived with Chinese all your life'? What does that have to do with your credentials about its economic history? Zip. Got that.
When have you ever seen me losing it on this forum, moron? I lose it with you because you act like a one-dimensional, moronic lunatic, singing the same "China is great, India is b@lls" tune all the time. And the worst part is, you're talking out of you hat! When I tell you, Deng's rejection of the Maoist doctrine is a direct result of him witnessing Mao's sh!t and inefficiencies during the Sino-Soviet split, you give me some bullcr@p about him revolutionizing the Chinese economy, because he was some kinda 'revolutionising visionary'. You obviously learnt that in your history class, didn't you? Give it a break! And while you are giving it a break, read up on China's history. And no, don't take it from the 'studied Chinese history indepth' 'Chinese expert'.You just get funnier all the time.......keep it up....China expert. Hey there are a lot of Dumb Mallus here in Silicon-valley. I guess all the rocket scientists are in Mumbai.