Space exploration and technology

Is Solar Electrification Good for Military??


  • Total voters
    67
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,939
Likes
48,768
Country flag
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forum...ssia-develops-fundamentally-new-space-weapons


Russia develops fundamentally new space weapons


Russia's air and space forces are preparing for future threats from space with a "fundamentally new weapon," a senior officer said Saturday on Ekho Moskvy radio.

"We are developing a fundamentally new weapon that can destroy potential targets in space," Col. Eduard Sigalov of Russia's air and space defense forces said.

The brigade commander said the 5th Brigade of the air and space defense forces, which is deployed in the Moscow Region, is ready to protect the capital against potential threats from outer space.

"In the near future we will have to perform the task of protecting Moscow from space-based threats," Sigalov said, adding that he hoped the potential protection would be enough and it would not actually have to be used.

He said the brigade currently had S-300 (SA-10 Grumble, SA-12 Giant/Gladiator) and S-400 (SA-21 Growler) missile systems and was capable of destroying any airborne threat.

The colonel added that improvements in recent years meant that units could now be ready to fire within 10 minutes.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,939
Likes
48,768
Country flag
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/space-war-weapons-heats-up-100505.html

Is a New Space Weapon Race Heating Up?
By Jeremy Hsu
SPACE.com Contributor
posted: 05 May 2010
07:56 am ET

A U.S. Air Force space plane and a failed hypersonic glider tested by the Pentagon represent the latest space missions to raise concerns about weapons in space. But while their exact purpose remains murky, they join a host of new space technology tests that could eventually bring the battlefield into space.

Some space technology demonstrations are more obviously space weapons, such as the anti-satellite missile capabilities tested by the U.S. and China in recent years. India has also begun developing its own anti-satellite program which would combine lasers and an exo-atmospheric kill vehicle, as announced at the beginning of 2010.

The U.S. military and others have also long developed and deployed more neutral space assets such as rockets and satellites for military purposes. In that sense, both the Air Force's X-37B robotic space plane and the HTV-2 hypersonic glider prototype of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) could represent similarly ambiguous technologies which may or may not lead to weapons.

Ads by Google Paintball, 4x4, SnaplinkWe go anywhere in Israel Best prices, best gear, best fun www.amitz.biz Helicopters for saleNew and Used Helicopters for sale up to date listings visit today www.leaderaviation.com Whats hot in Brazil?Brazilian Forestry Brazil's Best Kept Secret Returns 8 to 14% www.greenwood-management.com
"Space has been militarized since before NASA was even created," said Joan Johnson-Freese, a space policy analyst at the Naval War College in Newport, RI. Yet she sees weaponization as a different issue from militarization because "so much space technology is dual use" in terms of having both civilian and military purposes, as well as offensive or defensive use.

Such uncertainty regarding space technology can make it tricky for nations to gauge the purpose or intentions behind new prototypes, including the X-37B space plane or the HTV-2 hypersonic glider.

The U.S. military could even be using the cloak of mystery to deliberately bamboozle and confuse rival militaries, according to John Pike, a military and security analyst who runs GlobalSecurity.org. He suggested that the X-37B and HTV-2 projects could represent the tip of a space weapons program hidden within the Pentagon's secret "black budget," or they might be nothing more than smoke and mirrors.

The devil is in the details

Many existing space technologies play dual roles in both military and civilian life.

The Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) system which started out as military-only has since become common in consumer smartphones and car navigation systems. Modern rocketry grew in part from the technology and scientific minds behind Nazi Germany's V-2 rockets of World War II, and continued to evolve alongside ballistic missile technology.

Even something as basic as a satellite image can be used for either military weapons targeting or civilian crop rotation, Johnson-Freese said. Space plane technology can seem equally ambiguous — the Air Force deputy undersecretary of space programs scoffed at the notion of X-37B paving the way for future space weapons.

"The whole issue is further complicated because beyond technologies like lasers, Rods from God, explosives, etc.... virtually any object traveling in space can be a weapon if it can be maneuvered to run into another object," Johnson-Freese told SPACE.com.

Uncertainty matters a great deal for how other nations view the recent U.S. space plane and hypersonic glider tests, regardless of whether or not the technologies lead to future weapons.

"They are testing capabilities that could certainly be useful to the military if it chose to use them in an offensive manner," Johnson-Freese said. "And the military has been silent on intent."

Intrigue and deception

Pike said the current work under way by the U.S. military leaves plenty of room for misinterpretations or even outright deception, which could be a ploy to distract other nations with military space projects.

"One of them could be a deception program and the other could be the spitting image of the real thing," Pike noted. He said that such misdirection could force other nations' militaries to waste money chasing down dead ends.

Both the Air Force space plane and DARPA's hypersonic glider may have a combined budget of several hundred million dollars per year, Pike estimated. He described such spending as "chump change" compared to the Pentagon's black budget spending in recent years of $6 billion to $8 billion annually — and he pointed to decades worth of known space plane programs which had amounted to little.

"I conclude that the hypersonic trans-atmospheric space plane domain is either unusually badly managed even for government programs, or there's a lot of hocus pocus here," Pike said. "I defy anyone to tell the difference between hocus pocus and mismanagement."

Of course, the U.S. military could theoretically make good use of either the X-47B or HTV-2. An operational space plane could launch quickly as a replacement for recon satellites disabled in the opening salvoes of a conflict, and could "play hide and seek" to avoid being shot down easily. Similarly, a hypersonic aircraft or weapon might allow the U.S. to eliminate threats early on without warning.

Walking the line on weapon bans

The double-edged nature of space technologies has also complicated international efforts to ban entire classes of technologies which might serve as space weapons. Instead, there has been interest in "more modest proposals that focus on behavior, rather than what you are allowed to build or test," said Karl Mueller, a political scientist at the RAND Corporation.

Military use of space looks likely to expand, according to the experts. But Mueller explained that the U.S. military's interest in space has less to do with the dazzling futuristic visions of space planes and more to do with "unglamorous" satellites and orbital sensor systems. Such technologies give situational awareness of all the satellites, spacecraft and debris in orbit.

One such example is the $800 million Space Based Space Surveillance satellite slated for launch in July. It carries an optical telescope to help Air Force ground-based radars track the growing orbital traffic of satellites and space debris — a goal which everyone can appreciate.

"That's true whether you're hawkish and enthusiastic about using force in space, or whether you're dovish and want to maintain the sanctuary of space and maximize peaceful spacefaring," Mueller said.

Warder
 
Last edited:

nandu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,913
Likes
163
Atlantis crew completes first STS-132 spacewalk


Mission Specialists Garrett Reisman (left) and Stephen Bowen begin the first STS-132 spacewalk. Photo: NASA TV.

WASHINGTON : US astronauts have completed the first of three planned spacewalks from the shuttle Atlantis a day after the craft docked with the International Space Station.

Astronauts Garrett Reisman and Stephen Bowen finished the seven-hour, 25-minute spacewalk at 3:19 pm (local time) after installing a second space-to-ground communications antenna and a spare parts platform on Dexter, the two-armed robotic device on the orbiting ISS.

It was the 237th spacewalk by US astronauts, the second for Reisman and the fourth for Bowen, NASA said on Monday.

The pair meanwhile loosened battery bolts on the port-6 backbone segment of the station in preparation for the other spacewalks.

Atlantis brought to the station six new 170-kg batteries to be installed during the second and third spacewalks.

The shuttle and its crew of six successfully docked with the orbiting space lab on Sunday about 350 km above the South Pacific.

The mission is the 32nd and final scheduled voyage for Atlantis, which first launched in 1985 and has logged some 115 million miles in its career.

Only two more shuttle launches remain -- one in September for Discovery and the final blast off for Endeavour in November -- before the curtain falls on this era of human spaceflight.

http://www.brahmand.com/news/Atlantis-crew-completes-first-STS-132-spacewalk/3923/1/10.html
 

nandu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,913
Likes
163
Russia, US may jointly develop nuclear engine for spacecraft

MOSCOW : Russia and the US could jointly develop a whole range of new generation engines for spacecraft designed for exploration of deep space, according to a top Russian official.

"A decision may be adopted soon, probably during the upcoming visit of President Dmitry Medvedev to the United States," Russian Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said.

Ivanov, who looks after the hi-tech industry in Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's cabinet, is currently in Washington to prepare technological agenda of Medvedev's upcoming US visit in June.

"The future exploration of outer space will require nuclear-powered engines for carrier rockets and spacecraft, and work on these costly development projects should start as soon as possible and could also involve other countries," Ivanov said.

He underscored the need to look beyond the International Space Station, which would be completing its life cycle in 2020 or shortly after that and both space super powers should have new joint space projects.

"It is a very ambitious task, a serious challenge both in technological and financial terms. That is why we realise that we can achieve the goal only by joining technological and financial efforts of both countries with participation of international community," Ivanov was quoted as saying by ITAR-TASS.

He said that the proposals have been tabled before NASA.

Meanwhile, Chief of Russia's Roscosmos Federal Space Agency Anatoly Perminov said nuclear engines for spaceships were a very promising area and should be created to make flights to Mars and other planets.

Solar power is used for missions to the inner planets, but at distances beyond Earth's orbit the sun's energy is too weak to be used as a power source.

This year the Russian government has already allocated USD 16.7 million to start a project to build a spacecraft with a nuclear engine. NASA started a programme to develop a nuclear propulsion system in 2003, but scrapped it after spending millions of dollars.

"The draft design of spacecraft powered by a nuclear engine would be finalised by 2012 and the financing for further development in the next nine years would require an investment of at least USD 580 million," Perminov was quoted as saying by RIA Novosti.

http://www.brahmand.com/news/Russia...-nuclear-engine-for-spacecraft/3932/1/11.html
 

RAM

The southern Man
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
2,288
Likes
445
Country flag
Dedicated satellite for Navy by year-end

Dedicated satellite for Navy by year-end


NEW DELHI: India's first dedicated military satellite should be up in space well within a year. Indian Space Research Organisation has fixed the "launch window'' of the naval communication and surveillance satellite between December 2010 and March 2011.

The defence establishment was slightly worried ISRO might not be able to stick to the planned launch window after the failure of the geosynchronous satellite launch vehicle (GSLV-D3) in mid-April, which was launched with the new indigenously-developed cryogenic engine.

"But ISRO has assured us the naval satellite, with an around 1,000 nautical mile footprint over Indian Ocean, will be launched as slated... The project cost is Rs 950 crore. IAF and Army satellites will follow in a couple of years,'' said a senior MoD official on Wednesday.

This comes even as the top Navy brass, led by Admiral Nirmal Verma, is currently discussing the intricacies of "navy-wide network-centric operations'' and "maritime domain awareness'', both of which hinge on dedicated satellite capabilities, during the ongoing naval commanders' conference here.

Coupled with induction of eight P-8i long-range maritime patrol aircraft between 2013 and 2017 under a $2.1-billion deal inked with US, the geo-stationary satellite will ensure a quantum jump in Navy's C4ISR (command, control, communication, computer, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) capabilities.

Though India sees its primary area of strategic interest stretching from Persian Gulf to Malacca Strait, Navy as of now does not have "dedicated sensors'' which can provide it with a "clear picture of all actors'' in the constantly changing maritime environment.

The dedicated satellite will help Navy network all its warships, submarines and aircraft among themselves as well as with operational centres ashore through high-speed data-links. "Maritime threats can then be detected and shared in real-time to ensure swift reaction,'' said an officer.

Indian armed forces have long used "dual use'' satellites like Cartosat-I, Cartosat-II and Cartosat-IIA, among others, but it will only be now that they will get dedicated satellites of their own.

This is in keeping with the Defence Space Vision-2020, which identifies intelligence, reconnaissance, surveillance, communication and navigation as the thrust areas in Phase-I till 2012. The need to keep "real-time'' tabs on enemy troop movements, warships, airbases, missile silos and the like cannot be over-emphasised.

There are, for instance, around 300 dedicated or dual-use military satellites orbiting around the earth at present. The US, of course, leads the pack, owning 50% of them, followed by Russia and China.

India, however, has been slow to react to even China's huge strides in the military use of space, which was rudely brought home by Beijing's test of an ASAT (anti-satellite) weapon in January 2007. The government, for instance, is still reluctant to establish a full-fledged Aerospace Command despite the armed forces demanding it for years.


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-for-Navy-by-year-end/articleshow/5950179.cms
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,939
Likes
48,768
Country flag
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1621/1

India's missile defense/anti-satellite nexus


While China's 2007 anti-satellite (ASAT) test and its missile defense intercept test earlier this year have attracted much attention and concern, another emerging space power has also been expressing its interest in developing those capabilities yet attracting very little notice: India. Given enthusiastic statements by Indian officials about what they see as the need for ASATs and the country's continued missile defense efforts, this could be worrisome. Though most of the rhetoric can be chalked up to regional rivalry, and much of the grandstanding downplays the level of technical capacity that still needs to be developed, India's plans for missile defense and their relationship to space security bear further monitoring.


India has been working on a missile defense system that is primarily indigenously built for several decades, but it wasn't until relatively recently that successes were repeated during testing. India held missile defense intercept attempts in November 2006 (a test where the intercept occurred outside the Earth's atmosphere, or was exoatmospheric), December 2007 (a test where Indian officials claimed that the intercept occurred inside the Earth's atmosphere, or was endoatmospheric, despite video footage implying that the interceptor missed the target), March 2009 (an exoatmospheric test), and March 2010.1 During the last test, the modified Prithvi target missile did not follow its scheduled flight path and thus the interceptor missile, called the Advanced Air Defense (AAD) missile, was not launched.2 Indian officials have indicated that they want to deploy a working missile defense system by 2012. Defense Research and Development Organization Director General V.K. Saraswat stated last October that the "[o]nly part that remains to be developed is the interceptor missile;"3 the US Missile Defense Agency's experience in developing interceptors might demonstrate to him how much work India might have ahead of itself. Per Saraswat, there are two phases to India's intended ballistic missile program: the first phase is planned to intercept target missiles with ranges of up to 2,000 kilometers via "exo-atmospheric, endo-atmospheric and high-altitude interceptions," while in the second phase, India will strive to be able to intercept target missiles with ranges of 5,000 kilometers, which potentially could give India the ability to intercept intercontinental ballistic missiles.4 Saraswat also proudly noted after China held its first missile defense intercept test attempt in January 2010, "This is one area where we are senior to China."5

Dr K. Kasturirangan, former head of the India Space Research Organization (ISRO), said in September 2009, "China's ASAT capabilities displayed a few years ago was to show to the world that they too can do it. That China can do what it wants to do and demonstrate that it can do even more"¦ to supersede the best of the world, that is the US."6 He also stated, "Obviously we start worrying. We cannot overlook this aspect."7 Kasturirangan, sounding very similar to some parts of the US national space community, asserted that "India has spent a huge sum to develop its capabilities and place assets in space. Hence, it becomes necessary to protect them from adversaries. There is a need to look at means of securing these."8

In January 2010, Saraswat tipped India's hand further when he told reporters, "India is putting together building blocks of technology that could be used to neutralize enemy satellites," and that "We are working to ensure space security and protect our satellites. At the same time we are also working on how to deny the enemy access to its space assets."9 This last part is very similar to statements made by some US officials charged with protecting US space assets. Saraswat did acknowledge, "Basically, these are deterrence technologies and quite certainly many of these technologies will not be used."10 If that last part is true, it does raise the question of how much of a deterrent these technologies may actually provide, since the Indian government claims not to intend to use them.

Clarifying his statements from the previous month, Saraswat announced in February 2010, "In Agni-III, we have the building blocks and the capability to hit a satellite but we don't have to hit a satellite"¦ If you hit a satellite, the repercussions are that we will have debris and they will be detrimental to objects in space and it will remain in there for many years."12 This was a welcome acknowledgement by an Indian military official of some of the negative consequences of actively testing an ASAT program. Instead, Saraswat said that India "will validate the anti-satellite capability on the ground through simulation," emphasizing that "there is no program to do a direct hit to the satellite."13 Conflating India's successes thus far with its ballistic missile arsenal development and its plans for a ballistic missile defense system, he went on to say, "With the kill vehicle available and with the propulsion system of Agni III, that can carry the missile up to 1,000 kilometers altitude, we can reach the orbit in which the satellite is and it is well within our capability."14

Part of why India may be interested in developing an ASAT capability is that it wishes to use it as a way to enhance its missile defense program and, to a lesser extent, its domestic science and technology skills. This is latter is seen even in the United States, which has a much longer history of space activities, where some of the strongest proponents for continuing with space exploration (for example) couch their arguments in the need to maintain and expand an intellectual industrial base for space technology know-how. An ASAT capability requires, if one is using kinetic kill vehicles and not relying on the destruction from an electromagnetic pulse or a nuclear-tipped warhead, very solid and reliable hit-to-kill capabilities. India has explicitly expressed its interest in developing more or less indigenously its own missile defense system and has been working assiduously on such a program for some time; thus, an ASAT program, as it were, would also be a technology demonstration program for a missile defense system. This highlights the similarities between missile defense and ASATs. Interestingly enough, India seemed a few years ago like it was more interested in purchasing parts of the Arrow Weapon System, a missile defense system co-developed by the United States and Israel. It apparently has since decided that it would rather build its own and gain the skill set such a system would require.

But primarily, as can be seen by statements by Indian officials, not ceding ground to its political regional rival, China, is mostly grandstanding by India. The Indians see China as their main competitor and nation of concern (regarding space capabilities) in the region. So these statements by Indian officials partially can be explained as bombast to assure domestic audiences that India is a peer of China or even ahead of it. However, there is another explanation: these statements indicate that India is interested in being able to reach China. The Indians may have decided that they should be able to cover all contingencies for future conflicts. The Pakistanis are already well within range of Indian ballistic missiles, and by developing this long-range missile capability, the Indians will be able to counter China as well. They can point to the 2007 Chinese ASAT test as an example of the pressing need for reciprocal capability; again, this mirrors some of the debate within the United States for why American space assets may be endangered. And since China reportedly held its own hit-to-kill missile defense test in January 2010, this just adds more justification to those who feel that India must have a missile defense system in order to keep up with regional capabilities.

There are lessons learned from previous arms control debates that have probably affected India's decision to seek a missile defense/ASAT capability. One strong one is that Indians remember well that the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) made a concrete division between the nuclear haves and the have-nots. This partition was largely based on who had held a nuclear test prior to the treaty's creation. India missed becoming an official nuclear weapon state by six years by having its first nuclear test—or, as India termed it, a "peaceful nuclear explosion"—in 1974. There are some within India who have taken that lesson to heart and want India to develop an ASAT capability so that India would be grandfathered in, should any future treaty or international agreement ban ASATs. This is probably to gain the prestige of being one of a select few states and the wish to avoid being hemmed in, should future Indian military officials decide that an ASAT capability is needed for their national security needs.
India's ASAT plans are worrisome because in the Indians' anxiety to keep up with China, they may unexpectedly create the exact thing that they are trying to avoid: a conflict in or about space.

India's interest in developing this missile defense/ASAT capability also could be seen as an unintended consequence from the October 2008 US-India nuclear deal. In it, the United States agreed to lift its ban on nuclear trade with India, despite India's not having signed the NPT and actively flouting the spirit of that treaty by holding nuclear weapon tests. The nuclear deal put India in a unique position relative to other non-conforming states to the NPT, thanks to its now special relationship with the United States; India may think that its benefactor will quietly look the other way while it develops ASATs. Furthermore, as noted earlier, many of India's justifications for pursuing ASATs are quite familiar to those following the debate being held in the United States about how best to protect US space assets.

Along those same lines, while there was much criticism of the debris created by China's 2007 ASAT test, international approbation was about all that China was subjected to. There were not any military responses, economic embargoes, or even technological limitations (beyond what the export controls that the United States already had in place). Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe very delicately called the test illegal with this statement to the Japanese Diet: "I believe it would not be in compliance with basic international rules such as the Outer Space Treaty."15 (Article IX of the 1967 OST calls for prior international consultation if a state believes its planned space activities may be harmful to others.)16 So perhaps India figures that despite the unpopularity of developing ASATs, there are not going to be any tangible consequences to doing so.

Now, if India were to actually test an ASAT, that might prove to be a different story, but as can be seen by the Indian officials quoted above, they probably realize that as well and have opted not to cross that line. Also, perhaps maintaining ambiguity around its ASAT plans serve India better than holding an actual test and removing all doubt as to whether it actually has that capability.

Finally, it is important to put India's missile defense/ASAT ambitions within the proper context. India does not have the indigenous space situational awareness capability needed for an ASAT system. India is working to improve this but, as the US missile defense systems' trials and tribulations have shown, it is not something that can be developed rapidly, even if given great leeway in its development and a relatively blank check. While a dedicated satellite network is not a necessity, it does raise the question of how India intends to be able to detect and track missile launches. The United States' experience in shooting down the de-orbiting satellite USA 193 in February 2008 with a modified Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) interceptor demonstrated that missile defense radars often do not have the capacity to keep up with a satellite target, since the Aegis system's radars were unable to track at the very fast speed that the satellite was travelling. Finally, while it is true that, generally speaking, a ballistic missile is expected to be able to reach an altitude of about half its range, this does not mean that this automatically translates into being able to reach that altitude while simultaneously serving as a missile defense interceptor. The Agni-III or -V may be powerful ballistic missiles, but they cannot be scaled down and just swapped into the Indian missile defense network in order to have a missile defense capacity; thus claims about their effectiveness equaling an enhanced ASAT or missile defense capability should be taken with a grain of salt.

India's ASAT plans are worrisome because in the Indians' anxiety to keep up with China, they may unexpectedly create the exact thing that they are trying to avoid: a conflict in or about space. If their statements are misunderstood or if they ratchet up the rhetoric, they may thrust India into the position of having to hope that its missile defense interceptors do, indeed, serve as able ASATs.
 

Patriot

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,761
Likes
544
Country flag
http://abclive.in/abclive_national/first_dedicated_military_satellite_defence_space_vision-2020.html

India to Launch First Military Use Satellite Under Defence Space Vision-2020
20 May, 2010 08:44:00 Dinesh Singh - Rawat

India to Launch First Military Use Satellite Under Defence Space Vision-2020 New Delhi (ABC Live): India has decided to launch its first dedicated military satellite by 2011 under Defence Space Vision-2020.

New Delhi (ABC Live): India has decided to launch its first dedicated military satellite by 2011 under Defence Space Vision-2020.

Information to this effect was shared by Ministry of Defence that Indian Space Research Organization has assured us the naval satellite, with an around 1,000 nautical mile footprint over Indian Ocean, will be launched as slated... The project cost is Rs 950 crore. IAF and Army satellites will follow in a couple of years.''

The dedicated satellite will help Navy network all its warships, submarines and aircraft among themselves as well as with operational centres ashore through high-speed data-links. "Maritime threats can then be detected and shared in real-time to ensure swift reaction,'' said an officer.

Indian armed forces have been already using "dual use'' satellites like Cartosat-I, Cartosat-II and Cartosat-IIA, but after this dedicated military satellite they will get dedicated satellites of their own.

In cureent time there are 300 dedicated or dual-use military satellites present in earth space, out of these 150 belonged to US followed by Russia and China.

=xy
 

nandu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,913
Likes
163
India to Launch First Military Use Satellite Under Defence Space Vision-2020



India has decided to launch its first dedicated military satellite by 2011 under Defence Space Vision-2020.

Information to this effect was shared by Ministry of Defence that Indian Space Research Organization has assured us the naval satellite, with an around 1,000 nautical mile footprint over Indian Ocean, will be launched as slated"¦ The project cost is Rs 950 crore. IAF and Army satellites will follow in a couple of years."

The dedicated satellite will help Navy network all its warships, submarines and aircraft among themselves as well as with operational centres ashore through high-speed data-links. "Maritime threats can then be detected and shared in real-time to ensure swift reaction," said an officer.

Indian armed forces have been already using "dual use" satellites like Cartosat-I, Cartosat-II and Cartosat-IIA, but after this dedicated military satellite they will get dedicated satellites of their own.

In cureent time there are 300 dedicated or dual-use military satellites present in earth space, out of these 150 belonged to US followed by Russia and China.

http://idrw.org/?p=1743#more-1743
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Its a good news. Any news about features of satellite. like resolution and range or if its a foreign collaboration ?
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,939
Likes
48,768
Country flag
http://www.space-travel.com/reports...off_with_space_yacht_and_Venus_probe_999.html

Japan rocket blasts off with 'space yacht' and Venus probe



A Japanese rocket blasted off early Friday and successfully launched a Venus probe and a kite-shaped "space yacht" designed to float through the cosmos using only the power of the sun.

The launch vehicle, the H-IIA rocket, took off from the Tanegashima space centre in southern Japan on schedule at 6:58 am (Thursday 2158 GMT), three days after its original launch was postponed by bad weather.

Live footage on the website of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) showed the rocket disappear into the sky.

"It was an almost perfect launch," Teruaki Kawai, a space business manager with the rocket's manufacturer, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, told a televised press conference from the island of Tanegashima.

It was the 11th straight launch success for the H-IIA, Japan's primary space vehicle, after a rocket was forced to self-destruct after blastoff in 2003 when one of its boosters failed to disengage from the main body.

The rocket Friday carried the experimental "Ikaros" -- an acronym for Interplanetary Kite-craft Accelerated by Radiation of the Sun -- designed to be propelled by the pressure of sunlight particles.

Similar to an ocean yacht pushed by wind, the device has a square, ultra-thin and flexible sail, measuring 14 by 14 metres (46 by 46 feet), that will be driven through space as it is pelted by solar particles.

The sail, only a fraction of the thickness of a human hair, is also partly coated with thin-film solar cells to generate electricity.

The name of the spacecraft alludes to Icarus, the figure from Greek mythology who flew too close to the sun. The space yacht, however, is headed in the direction of Venus.

Ikaros, which cost 1.5 billion yen (16 million dollars) to develop, will be the first use of the propellant-free technology in deep space, although it has been tested in orbit around the Earth before.

"This idea of a solar sail was born some 100 years ago, as we often find it in science fiction novels, but it has not been realised to date," JAXA says on its website.

"If we can verify this navigation technology through the Ikaros, it will mark the first spectacular achievement of its kind in the world."

The rocket also released the Planet-C Venus Climate Orbiter, nicknamed Akatsuki, which means "Dawn" in Japanese.

Japan's first Venus probe is a box-shaped golden satellite, fitted with two paddle-shaped solar panels, that is set to arrive at Venus in about six months.

"I'm full of joy after the probe was put into the right orbit," Masato Nakamura, the JAXA chief scientist in charge of Akatsuki development, said at the press conference. "My heart is beating, thinking of what's ahead."

Venus is similar in size and age to Earth but has a far more hostile climate, with temperatures around 460 degrees Celsius (860 degrees Fahrenheit) and large amounts of carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas on Earth.

Scientists believe a probe of the climate of Venus will help them deepen their understanding of the formation of the Earth's environment and its future.

The probe will work closely with the European Space Agency's Venus Express.

Fitted with five cameras, its mission is to peer through the planet's thick layer of sulphuric acid clouds to monitor the meteorology of Venus, search for possible lightning, and scan its crust for active volcanoes.

It will observe the planet in an elliptical orbit, from a distance of between 300 and 80,000 kilometres (200 to 50,000 miles).

The Japanese rocket also released four other small satellites, developed by Japanese universities and other institutions.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,939
Likes
48,768
Country flag
India to Launch First Military Use Satellite

http://abclive.in/abclive_national/first_dedicated_military_satellite_defence_space_vision-2020.html

India to Launch First Military Use Satellite Under Defence Space Vision-2020

New Delhi (ABC Live): India has decided to launch its first dedicated military satellite by 2011 under Defence Space Vision-2020.

New Delhi (ABC Live): India has decided to launch its first dedicated military satellite by 2011 under Defence Space Vision-2020.

Information to this effect was shared by Ministry of Defence that Indian Space Research Organization has assured us the naval satellite, with an around 1,000 nautical mile footprint over Indian Ocean, will be launched as slated... The project cost is Rs 950 crore. IAF and Army satellites will follow in a couple of years.''

The dedicated satellite will help Navy network all its warships, submarines and aircraft among themselves as well as with operational centres ashore through high-speed data-links. "Maritime threats can then be detected and shared in real-time to ensure swift reaction,'' said an officer.

Indian armed forces have been already using "dual use'' satellites like Cartosat-I, Cartosat-II and Cartosat-IIA, but after this dedicated military satellite they will get dedicated satellites of their own.
In cureent time there are 300 dedicated or dual-use military satellites present in earth space, out of these 150 belonged to US followed by Russia and China.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,939
Likes
48,768
Country flag
cross posted

http://abclive.in/abclive_national/first_dedicated_military_satellite_defence_space_vision-2020.html

India to Launch First Military Use Satellite Under Defence Space Vision-2020


New Delhi (ABC Live): India has decided to launch its first dedicated military satellite by 2011 under Defence Space Vision-2020.

New Delhi (ABC Live): India has decided to launch its first dedicated military satellite by 2011 under Defence Space Vision-2020.

Information to this effect was shared by Ministry of Defence that Indian Space Research Organization has assured us the naval satellite, with an around 1,000 nautical mile footprint over Indian Ocean, will be launched as slated... The project cost is Rs 950 crore. IAF and Army satellites will follow in a couple of years.''

The dedicated satellite will help Navy network all its warships, submarines and aircraft among themselves as well as with operational centres ashore through high-speed data-links. "Maritime threats can then be detected and shared in real-time to ensure swift reaction,'' said an officer.

Indian armed forces have been already using "dual use'' satellites like Cartosat-I, Cartosat-II and Cartosat-IIA, but after this dedicated military satellite they will get dedicated satellites of their own.
In cureent time there are 300 dedicated or dual-use military satellites present in earth space, out of these 150 belonged to US followed by Russia and China.
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
finally , dedicated statellite , I am really surprised that after so long this satellite is launched ,because we did have capability for long , and i think IAF and IA also need satellite
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
Glonass

http://www.glonass-ianc.rsa.ru/pls/htmldb/f?p=202:20:2167190016164175::NO
GLONASS (Russian: ГЛОНАСС, abbreviation of ГЛОбальная НАвигационная Спутниковая Система; tr.: GLObal'naya NAvigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema; "GLObal NAvigation Satellite System" in English) is a radio-based satellite navigation system, developed by the former Soviet Union and now operated for the Russian government by the Russian Space Forces. It is an alternative and complementary to the United States' Global Positioning System (GPS), the Chinese Compass navigation system, and the planned Galileo positioning system of the European Union (EU).
Development on the GLONASS began in 1976, with a goal of global coverage by 1991. Beginning on 12 October 1982, numerous rocket launches added satellites to the system until the constellation was completed in 1995. Following completion, the system rapidly fell into disrepair with the collapse of the Russian economy. Beginning in 2001, Russia committed to restoring the system and by April 2010 it is practically restored (21 of 24 satellites are operational).

System description

[edit]Purpose
GLONASS was developed to provide real-time position and velocity determination, initially for use by the Soviet military for navigation and ballistic missile targeting. It was the Soviet Union's second generation satellite navigation system, improving on the Tsiklon system which required one to two hours of signal processing to calculate a location with high accuracy. By contrast, once a GLONASS receiver is tracking the satellite signals, a position fix is available instantly. It is stated that at peak efficiency the system's standard positioning and timing service provide horizontal positioning accuracy within 57–70 meters, vertical positioning within 70 meters, velocity vector measuring within 15 cm/s, and time transfer within 1 µs (all within 99.7% probability).[1]
[edit]Orbital characteristics
A fully operational GLONASS constellation consists of 24 satellites. The three orbital planes' ascending nodes are separated by 120° with each plane containing eight equally spaced satellites. The orbits are roughly circular, with an inclination of about 64.8°, and orbit the Earth at an altitude of 19,100 km (11,868 mi), which yields an orbital period of approximately 11 hours, 15 minutes. The planes themselves have a latitude displacement of 15°, which results in the satellites crossing the equator one at a time, instead of three at once. The overall arrangement is such that, if the constellation is fully populated, a minimum of five satellites are in view from any given point at any given time.
Each satellite is identified by a "slot" number, which defines the corresponding orbital plane and the location within the plane; numbers 1–8 are in plane one, 9–16 are in plane two, and 17–24 are in plane three.
A characteristic of the GLONASS constellation is that any given satellite only passes over the exact same spot on the Earth every eighth sidereal day. However, as each orbit plane contains eight satellites, a satellite will pass the same place every sidereal day. For comparison, each GPS satellite passes over the same spot once every sidereal day.
[edit]Signals
This section requires expansion.


A Russian military rugged, combined GLONASS/GPS receiver
GLONASS satellites transmit two types of signal: a standard precision (SP) signal and an obfuscated high precision (HP) signal.
All satellites transmit the same code as their SP signal, however each transmits on a different frequency using a 15-channel frequency division multiple access (FDMA) technique spanning either side from 1602.0 MHz, known as the L1 band. The center frequency is 1602 MHz + n × 0.5625 MHz, where n is a satellite's frequency channel number (n=−7,−6,−5,...,7). Signals are transmitted in a 38° cone, using right-hand circular polarization, at an EIRP between 25 to 27 dBW (316 to 500 watts). Note that the 24 satellite constellation is accommodated with only 15 channels by using identical frequency channels to support antipodal (opposite side of planet in orbit) satellite pairs, as these satellites will never be in view of an earth based user at the same time.
The HP signal is broadcast in phase quadrature with the SP signal, effectively sharing the same carrier wave as the SP signal, but with a ten times higher bandwidth than the SP signal.
The L2 signals use the same FDMA as the L1 band signals, but transmit straddling 1246 MHz with the center frequency determined by the equation 1246 MHz + n×0.4375 MHz, where n spans the same range as for L1.[2] Other details of the HP signal have not been disclosed.


A combined GLONASS/GPS Personal Radio Beacon
At peak efficiency, the SP signal offers horizontal positioning accuracy within 5–10 meters, vertical positioning within 15 meters, a velocity vector measuring within 10 cm/s, and timing within 200 ns, all based on measurements from four satellite signals simultaneously (this reference is outdated, as it's based on URAGAN satellites while the current constellation is 18/19 URAGAN-M satellites.[1] The more accurate HP signal is available for authorized users, such as the Russian Military, yet unlike the US P(Y) code which is modulated by an encrypting W code, the GLONASS P codes are broadcast in the clear using only 'security through obscurity'. Use of this signal bears risk however as the modulation (and therefore the tracking strategy) of the data bits on the L2P code has recently changed from unmodulated to 250bps burst at random intervals. The GLONASS L1P code is modulated at 50bps without a manchester meander code, and while it carries the same orbital elements as the CA code, it allocates more bits to critical Luni-Solar acceleration parameters and clock correction terms.
Currently, an additional civil reference signal is broadcast in the L2 band with an identical SP code to the L1 band signal. This is available from all satellites in the current constellation, except satellite number 795 which is the last of the inferior original GLONASS design, and one partially inoperable GLONASS-M satellite which is broadcasting only in the L1 band. (see www.glonass-ianc.rsa.ru for daily updates on constellation status.)
GLONASS uses a coordinate datum named "PZ-90" (Earth Parameters 1990 – Parametry Zemli 1990), in which the precise location of the North Pole is given as an average of its position from 1900 to 1905. This is in contrast to the GPS's coordinate datum, WGS 84, which uses the location of the North Pole in 1984. As of September 17, 2007 the PZ-90 datum has been updated to differ from WGS 84 by less than 40 cm (16 in) in any given direction.
[edit]Satellites
As with GLONASS's predecessor program, Tsiklon, GLONASS satellites are developed under the leadership of the JSC Information Satellite Systems (formerly called NPO PM), with the assistance of the Institute for Space Device Engineering (ru:РНИИ КП) and the Russian Institute of Radio navigation and Time. Serial production of the satellites is primarily accomplished by the company PC Polyot.
Over the three decades of development, the satellites themselves have gone through numerous revisions, separated here as generations. The name of each satellite was Uragan (English: hurricane), followed either by a number for operational satellites or by an acronym GVM (Russian: габаритно-весовой макет; English: size weight dummy) for test satellites. All Uragan satellites had a GRAU designation 11F654, and each of them also had the usual ordinal "Cosmos-NNNN" designation.[3]
[edit]Prototypes (Generation zero)
The first GLONASS vehicles to be launched, referred to as Block I vehicles, were prototypes and GVM dummy vehicles. Three dummies and 18 prototypes were launched between 1982 and 1985. Designed to last only one year, they averaged an actual lifetime of 14 months.
[edit]First generation
The true first generation of Uragan (also called Glonass) satellites were all 3-axis stabilized vehicles, generally weighing 1,250 kg and were equipped with a modest propulsion system to permit relocation within the constellation. Over time they were upgraded to Block IIa, IIb, and IIv vehicles, with each block containing evolutionary improvements.
Six Block IIa satellites were launched in 1985–1986 with improved time and frequency standards over the prototypes, and increased frequency stability. These spacecraft also demonstrated a 16-month average operational lifetime. Block IIb spacecraft, with a 2-year design lifetimes, appeared in 1987, of which a total of 12 were launched, but half were lost in launch vehicle accidents. The six spacecraft that made it to orbit worked well, operating for an average of nearly 22 months.
Block IIv was the most prolific of the first generation. Used exclusively from 1988 to 2000, and continued to be included in launches through 2005, a total of 25 satellites were launched. The design life was three years, however numerous spacecraft exceeded this, with one late model lasting 68 months.[4]
Block II satellites were typically launched three at a time from the Baikonur Cosmodrome using Proton-K Blok-DM-2 or Proton-K Briz-M boosters. The only exception was when, on two launches, an Etalon geodetic reflector satellite was substituted for a GLONASS satellite.
[edit]Second generation
The second generation of satellites, known as Uragan-M (also called Glonass-M), were developed beginning in 1990 and first launched in 2001.
These satellites possess a substantially increased lifetime of seven years and weigh slightly more at 1,480 kg. They are approximately 2.4 m (7 ft 10 in) in diameter and 3.7 m (12 ft) high, with a solar array span of 7.2 m (24 ft) for an electrical power generation capability of 1600 watts at launch. The aft payload structure houses 12 primary antennas for L-band transmissions. Laser corner-cube reflectors are also carried to aid in precise orbit determination and geodetic research. On-board cesium clocks provide the local clock source.
A total of fourteen second generation satellites were launched through the end of 2007. As with the previous generation, the second generation spacecraft were launched in triplets using Proton-K Blok-DM-2 or Proton-K Briz-M boosters.
[edit]Third generation
The third generation satellites are known as Uragan-K (also called Glonass-K) spacecraft. These satellites are designed with a lifetime of 10 to 12 years, a reduced weight of only 750 kg, and offer an additional L-Band navigational signal. As with the previous satellites, these are 3-axis stabilized, nadir pointing with dual solar arrays. They will enter service in 2010.
Due to their weight reduction, Uragan-K spacecraft can be launched in pairs from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome launch site using the substantially lower cost Soyuz-2 boosters or in six-at-once from the Baikonur Cosmodrome using Proton-K Briz-M launch vehicles.
[edit]Ground control
The ground control segment of GLONASS is entirely located within former Soviet Union territory. The Ground Control Center and Time Standards is located in Moscow and the telemetry and tracking stations are in Saint Petersburg, Ternopol, Eniseisk, Komsomolsk-na-Amure.[5]
[edit]Receivers
Septentrio, Topcon, JAVAD, Magellan Navigation, Novatel, Leica Geosystems and Trimble Inc produce GNSS receivers making use of GLONASS. NPO Progress describes a receiver called "GALS-A1" which combines GPS and GLONASS reception. SkyWave Mobile Communications manufactures an Inmarsat-based satellite communications terminal that uses both GLONASS and GPS.[6]

Accuracy
Currently GLONASS accuracy is slightly less accurate than GPS.
According Russian system of differentional correction and monitoring's data[10] as of 2010 precisions of GLONASS navigation definitions (for p=0.95) for latitude and longitude were 4.46—8.38 m with mean number of NSV equals 7—8 (depends on station). In the same time precisions of GPS navigation definitions were 2.00—8.76 m with mean number of NSV equals 6—11 (depends on station).
For using both navigation systems simultaneously precisions of GLONASS/GPS navigation definitions were 2.37—4.65 m with mean number of NSV equals 14—19 (depends on station).
Russian Federal Space Agency's director Anatoly Perminov claimed[11] that some actions are in progress to increase GLONASS's accuracy. By 2011 accuracy should achieve 2.8 m by means of expanding GLONASS's constellation, improving ground segment, increasing ephemerids accuracy etc.
[edit]History

[edit]Development by the Soviet Union
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the Soviet Union identified the need and benefits of developing a new satellite-based radio navigation system. Their existing Tsiklon satellite navigation system, while highly accurate for stationary or slow-moving ships, required several hours of observation by the receiving station to fix a position, making it unusable for many navigation purposes and for the guidance of the new generation of ballistic missiles.
From 1968 to 1969, the research institutes of the Ministry of Defence, Academy of Sciences, and Soviet Navy cooperated to develop a single system for navigation of their air, land, sea, and space forces. This collaboration resulted in a 1970 document that established the requirements for such a system. Six years later, in December 1976, a plan for developing GLONASS was accepted in a Decision of the Central Committee of the CPSU and of the Council of Ministers of the USSR entitled "On Deployment of the Unified Space Navigation System GLONASS."
From 1982 through April 1991, the Soviet Union successfully launched a total of 43 GLONASS-related satellites plus five test satellites. In 1991, twelve functional GLONASS satellites in two planes were available; enough to allow limited usage of the system.
[edit]Completion delays
Following the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, continued development of GLONASS was undertaken by the Russian Federation. It was promised to be operational on September 24, 1993 by then-president Boris Yeltsin, however the constellation was not completed until December 1995.
In the six years following completion, Russia was unable to maintain the system. By April 2002, this resulted in only eight satellites remaining in operation, which rendered the system almost useless as a global navigation aid.
[edit]Restoration and modernization

With GLONASS falling rapidly into disrepair, a special-purpose federal program named "Global Navigation System" was undertaken by the Russian government on August 20, 2001. According to it, the GLONASS system was to be restored to fully deployed status (i.e. 24 satellites in orbit and continuous global coverage) by 2011.[12]
The New York Times reported in April 2007 that Russia had committed to accelerated launches, with eight satellites scheduled to be orbited in 2007 and a goal of reaching global coverage in 2009.[13] Microcom Systems reported on its website that two launches, in September and December 2007, would lift the final six second-generation satellites, and that April 2008 will see the first launch of two third-generation satellites.[14]
The 2007 launches occurred on 26 October and 25 December. Both launches were successful, orbiting six satellites altogether. Following the launches, Russia's First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov predicted that the launches would bring the GLONASS satellite fleet to up 18 satellites, the number necessary to provide navigation services over the entire Russian territory, and repeated that the system would have the required 24 satellites for worldwide coverage by 2010.[15] Once all of these satellites are fully commissioned and set to healthy, GLONASS signals will be available across 90 percent of Russia and 80 percent of the globe, according to RISDE.[citation needed]
Six new GLONASS satellites were added to the network in 2008.[8] Two more triplets of GLONASS-M satellites were placed into orbit in December 2009 and in March 2010.[16] Launch of the first third generation (GLONASS-K) satellite was postponed. (It was scheduled for February 2010.[17]) The head of Russian Space Agency, Anatoly Perminov said in September, 2008, that the number of satellites in the GLONASS constellation would be increased up to 30 by 2011.[8]
[edit]Cooperation with the Indian government
In January 2004 the Russian Space Agency (RSA) announced a joint venture deal with India's space agency, the Indian Space Research Organization, wherein the two government agencies would collaborate to restore the system to constant coverage of Russian and Indian territory by 2008 with 18 satellites, and be fully operational with all 24 satellites by 2010.[18]
Details announced in mid-2005 reported that Russia would build the satellites and that between 2006 and 2008 two satellites would be launched from India's Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Andhra Pradesh state, using the Indian Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) rockets.[19] As of December 2009, India has yet to launch any satellites as part of this project.
During a December 2005 summit between Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Russian President Vladimir Putin, it was agreed that India would share some of the development costs of the GLONASS-K series and launch two of the new satellites from India, in return for access to the HP signal.
[edit]Discussions with United States government
Following the December 2006 meeting in Moscow of the GPS-GLONASS Interoperability and Compatibility Working Group (WG-1), an announcement appeared on both US and Russian government websites stating both sides had made significant progress in understanding the benefit to the user community of changing GLONASS to a signal pattern that is in common with GPS and Galileo.[20] A change in the GLONASS system from its current FDMA technique to the GPS and Galileo's DSSS format would enable a simply-designed receiver to use both satellite systems simultaneously.
GPSWorld reported that the group had met twice prior to then and that the working group would likely make an announcement when they meet again in April 2007, during the International Satellite Forum 2007 in Moscow.[21] However no announcement was made.
[edit]Discussions with Cuba and Venezuela
Russia could include Cuba and Venezuela in a satellite navigation system originally designed for missile targeting by the Soviet military, the head of Russia's space agency said."We discussed the theme of joint use of the GLONASS satellite navigation system," Roskosmos chief Anatoly Perminov was quoted by RIA Novosti news agency as saying, referring to talks with officials in Venezuela.[22]
[edit]Civilian signals made officially available
On May 18, 2007, Russian president Vladimir Putin signed a decree officially providing open access to the civilian navigation signals of the GLONASS system, to Russian and foreign consumers, free of charge and without limitations. The Russian president also directed the Federal Space Agency to coordinating work to maintain, develop and enable the system for civilian and commercial needs.[23]
Additionally, Mr. Putin acquired a GLONASS-enabled collar for his black Labrador, Koni, as an afterthought of using GLONASS to monitor cattle and animals in the wild.[24]
[edit]ERA Glonass

Head of the Russian Federal Space Agency Anatoly Perminov said, that there is a new GLONASS project called "ERA" (Russian: ЭРА ГЛОНАСС), an acronym for "Emergency Reaction to Accidents" (Russian: Система экстренного реагирования при авариях).
The first phase of the project will include equipping of automobiles with GLONASS receivers and creation of a technology, that allows operators of emergency service 112 to use geographic data. The second phase will involve also GPS/GLONASS enabled phones and smartphones.
There is also planned to perform project called "Social GLONASS". It will allow to help people with reduced vision, old people, and children, who should be supervised.[25]
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Russia_India_May_Jointly_Make_Glonass_GPS_Navigation_Devices_999.html

Russia, India May Jointly Make Glonass, GPS Navigation Devices

The Glonass navigation satellite system is expected to start operating worldwide by the end of 2010. As soon as global operations are launched, India will be able to use the civilian signal, allowing users to determine their position to within five to 15 meters.
by Staff Writers
Moscow, Russia (RIA Novosti) Mar 10, 2010
Russia and India might establish a joint venture to produce navigation equipment for GPS and its Russian equivalent Glonass, the head of the Russian federal satellite navigation operator said on Tuesday.
Glonass - the Global Navigation Satellite System - is the Russian equivalent of the U.S. Global Positioning System, or GPS, and is designed for both military and civilian use. Both systems allow users to determine their positions to within a few meters.

"We are actively working on a project to establish a joint venture on Indian territory to produce various navigation equipment. In March a group of our negotiators will head there for another round of talks," said Aledxander Gurko, CEO of Navigation and Information Systems (NIS).

Russia currently has a total of 22 Glonass satellites in orbit, but only 16 of them are operational. The system requires 18 operational satellites for continuous navigation services covering the entire territory of Russia and at least 24 satellites to provide navigation services worldwide.

The Glonass navigation satellite system is expected to start operating worldwide by the end of 2010. As soon as global operations are launched, India will be able to use the civilian signal, allowing users to determine their position to within five to 15 meters.

India's access to a more precise military signal is yet to be approved by the heads of the two states.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said he would discuss cooperation in the Glonass project with Indian officials during his forthcoming visit to New Delhi
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
India is entering into an official agreement with Russia to be a part of its Glonass or Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS)

After America's Global Positioning System (GPS), Glonass is currently the only other satellite-based navigation system and it would be available for Indian military applications.
Under pacts signed in December, 2004, during the Indo-Russia summit in New Delhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's Moscow visit in December last year, ISRO and Roskosmos agreed to closely cooperate in the development of new generation GLONASS-K navigation satellites and launch them from the Indian space center with the help of Indian rockets to speed up the completion of the GLONASS system amid growing competition.
Russia successfully launched on December 25 three GLONASS satellites, bringing to 17 the number of Russia's in-orbit navigation spacecraft, plus two laser reflectors.
Full global navigation requires 24 spacecraft.
IRKUT sources say the Sukhoi Su-30MKI multi-role fighters supplied to the Indian Air Force are already equipped with GPS and GLONASS receivers for navigation.
India is also a partner in the European Union's Galileo system, which is scheduled to be ready by 2008, but since Galileo would only be for civilian use, joining the Russian Glonass becomes significant.
India's goal to be a global military power is dependent on access to satellite navigation.
Some variations of the Brahmos cruise missile and many future weapons being developed on the concept of "network-centric warfare" would depend on satellite navigation for precision, and Glonass is the only option, says a senior Indian military scientist.
Operated by the Russian Federation Ministry of Defense, Glonass is in bad shape today with just eight satellites providing the global navigation.
For a precise system, especially for military purposes, at least 24 satellites are required, so that three satellites are available over a particular area of the earth at any given time.
This week Russian Defense Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov announced plans to launch three Glonass satellites on Christmas Day (2005).
By 2008, Glonass expects to have seventeen satellites, which would make it accurate enough for military applications.
In the long run, the two sides would work towards having 24 satellites, making Glonass as robust as the U.S. GPS.
Then India would be among a handful of countries with a global navigation system for military applications.
The US is already in talks with the European Union to ensure that the Galileo system is not made available for military applications.
The Glonass system, military sources say, would give India an advantage over most countries in a future when network-centric warfare would be a normal function.
The Global Positioning System (GPS)

The first GPS satellite was launched by the U.S. Air Force in early 1978.
There are now at least 24 satellites orbiting the earth at an altitude of about 11,000 nautical miles.
The high altitude insures that the satellite orbits are stable, precise and predictable, and that the satellites' motion through space is not affected by atmospheric drag.
These 24 satellites make up a full GPS constellation.
GPS satellites pass over any point on the earth twice a day continuously broadcasting satellite positions and timing data via radio signals at the speed of light and take approximately 6/100ths of a second to reach the earth.
The Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS)

Glonass was launched in the early 1980s to rival America's GPS.
It fell into bad times when Russia entered a phase of economic confusion.
Not enough replacement satellites were sent, leaving Glonass today with only eight operational satellites.
The European Galileo System

Galileo is Europe's contribution to the next generation Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS).
The service will be free at the point of use, but a range of payable services with additional features will also be offered.
Design of the Galileo system is reaching final stages and the delivery of initial services is expected to be ready by 2008.
Why a satellite-based navigational system?

Any application where location information is needed is a possible candidate for this system.
The system's potential in contributing to precision warfare has been tested in some parts; particularly in the Iraq war by the U.S., and widely discussed globally.
With India's global position in the subcontinent, as well as its problems with terrorist movements, access to such a system is expected to give both its military and civilian administration a clear advantage over its potential foes.
These clips, or excerpts, come from the Daily News & Analysis (DNA)
Digital Edition, located in India.
Russian rocket takes three navigation satellites into space, December 25, 2005

A Russian Proton-K rocket blasted off from the Baikonur space center in Kazakhstan carrying three GLONASS navigation satellites.
One of the satellites is from an older generation, while the other two are of the new GLONASS-M type, the ITAR-TASS news agency said Sunday.
The GLONASS global navigation system was developed by the Russian army in the 1980s and is the country's equivalant to the US GPS system or Europe's Galileo. But its development has been slowed by funding shortages.
When the three satellites are placed in orbit, Russia will have seventeen GLONASS satellites operating.
Additional Information about Russian satellite launches

Russia launched the three navigation satellites into space on a Proton-K booster rocket that blasted off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan, the Space Forces said.
The system, developed during the 1970s, originally had 24 satellites but their number has dwindled. The three satellites launched Wednesday will bring the system strength up to 12, according to the ITAR-Tass news agency, which added that the system needs 15-18 satellites to operate normally.
GLONASS, a Russian acronym for Global Navigation Satellite System, was developed by the Russian military to enable ships, planes and ground troops to pinpoint their position anywhere on earth to within 50 feet (15 meters).
Like the United States' satellite network, called the Global Positioning System (GPS), the Russian network can be used by civilians who have the proper equipment. But the location devices are not yet widely available in Russia.
Most of Russia's satellites were designed during the Soviet era and have a life span of just a few years, and the struggling space industry lacks the funds to develop longer-lasting space vehicles that would be more cost-efficient.
Russian Space Agency chief Yuri Koptev said last year that Russia was on the brink of losing the GLONASS system, which the military needs to collect data for launches of mobile ballistic missiles and obtain other essential navigation services.
 

Minghegy

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
387
Likes
9
India to gear up for 'star wars'

NEW DELHI: India has no option but to get ready for "star wars" in the future, with countries like China working overtime to develop advanced ASAT (anti-satellite) capabilities with "direct-ascent" missiles, hit-to-kill "kinetic" and directed-energy laser weapons.

The defence ministry's spanking new "Technology Perspective and Capability Roadmap" seems to recognize this overriding necessity, outlining as it does a wide array of high-tech offensive and defensive capabilities Indian armed forces will need over the next 15 years.

Identifying priority areas ranging from space warfare, ballistic missile defence (BMD) and combat drones to electronic warfare, NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) defence and submarines equipped with AIP (air-independent propulsion), the roadmap holds that "technological superiority is increasingly going to be the decisive factor in future battles". The 76-page MoD roadmap to "provide the industry with an overview" about military requirements by 2025 does seem ambitious as of now, given the present poor state of the country's defence-industrial production base.

Nevertheless, it gives significant insight into what India plans to acquire in terms of futuristic military capabilities. The roadmap, after all, draws heavily from classified as well as unclassified parts of Army, IAF and Navy doctrines, the still-evolving long-term integrated perspective plan (2012-2027) and DRDO's S&T roadmap, among others. While India is already working in some of these sectors, the roadmap underlines the need to get cracking in the others as well. Ever since China shocked the world with an ASAT weapon test to destroy a satellite in January 2007, alarm bells have been clanging in the Indian defence establishment.

The MoD roadmap, on its part, identifies development of ASAT weapons "for electronic or physical destruction of satellites in both LEO (2,000-km altitude above earth's surface) and the higher GEO-synchronous orbits" as a thrust area.

Apart from "EMP (electromagnetic pulse) hardening" of satellite and sensors to protect them against ASAT weapons, it says armed forces want to induct satellite systems for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions in a major way. The uses range from synthetic aperture radar all-weather imagery and precision targeting to automatic target recognition technology and high-speed communication.

Army's need for "directed energy weapons (DEWs)" is also spelled out in the roadmap. These include mobile air defence to engage enemy rockets, missiles, fighters and helicopters, as also DEWs to neutralize UAVs at a distance of 8-10 km. Moreover, precision weapons and dazzlers are needed for swift counter-terrorist operations with minimum collateral damage.

Another thrust area is UAVs, especially armed ones like the American Predator and Reaper drones equipped with Hellfire missiles. "UAVs with advanced sensors and weapons are going to dominate all facets of the future battlefield",it says.
 
Last edited:

Agantrope

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
1,247
Likes
77
I heard that when putin visited it was about to sign, but under unkil pressure we havent signed this glonass agreement. can anyone throw more lights in it
 

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
we need to have Glonass working otherwise Americans will have full knowledge about movements of our planes.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top