Britain used to be the greatest naval power. Now, it is the USA. Russia was never the greatest naval power. Russia, however, has been the greatest land power since Peter the Great.His brother "Liaoning," it's not smoke.
OfftopicBritain used to be the greatest naval power. Now, it is the USA. Russia was never the greatest naval power. Russia, however, has been the greatest land power since Peter the Great.
Britain used to be the greatest naval power. Now, it is the USA. Russia was never the greatest naval power. Russia, however, has been the greatest land power since Peter the Great.
The Crimean War loss was due to the fact that the cowardly British had allied with the French. France and Britain were the greatest colonial powers that the world had ever seen. If they had fought the battle alone then things might have been different. Also the Russian state`s greatest strength was in defense and not offense. Britain and France both had technological superiority over the Russians during the 18th and 19th century. British rifle makers were often pioneers in the field of arms production. This was the reason why both Britain and France managed to create such a vast empire with a tiny population and win wars against Russia etc._________________________________________________________________So we lost the Crimean war of 1853-56?
Russian army had many serfs who were not so much enthusiastic about war. Britain and France also had Turkey and Sardinia-Piedmont. British also had Enfield Muskets when Russians still had Muzzle loading Muskets. Plus Russians also had to fight in Baltics, east Europe and Caucasus.The Crimean War loss was due to the fact that the cowardly British had allied with the French. France and Britain were the greatest colonial powers that the world had ever seen. If they had fought the battle alone then things might have been different. Also the Russian state`s greatest strength was in defense and not offense. Britain and France both had technological superiority over the Russians during the 18th and 19th century. British rifle makers were often pioneers in the field of arms production. This was the reason why both Britain and France managed to create such a vast empire with a tiny population and win wars against Russia etc.
This is apparently the same Enfield rifle that caused the Indian rebellion of 1857.Russian army had many serfs who were not so much enthusiastic about war. Britain and France also had Turkey and Sardinia-Piedmont. British also had Enfield Muskets when Russians still had Muzzle loading Muskets. Plus Russians also had to fight in Baltics, east Europe and Caucasus.
How do you say poorly? You clearly don't know: they are supported by over 50 of the richest countries in the world. And still they lost. Bunch of defeatist cowards. And since you are so uninformed I will be happy to teach you some lessons.It does not show professionalism. The assault on Aleppo is almost half a year, using the Syrian army, hezbolla, Russian PMCs. With the support of the Syrian aircraft, Russian aerospace forces, cruise missiles and heavy artillery against poorly armed units of Islamists and the opposition.
The Russkies have the balls to fly. Remember when CDG had moved to the Mediterranean last Dec after the Paris attacks and launched fire and brimstone bombings. After a few sorties they quietly sneaked back home with their tail between their legs. They didn't even have the cojones to avenge the deaths of their own citizens.Su-33 crashed while landing on the "Admiral Kuznetsov". This is the second loss of the fighter in the "Syrian campaign" aircraft carrier.
They throw the money back? They have no air support, no major artillery support, for Chechen militants have also been rich sponsors but no weapons.How do you say poorly? You clearly don't know: they are supported by over 50 of the richest countries in the world. And still they lost. Bunch of defeatist cowards. And since you are so uninformed I will be happy to teach you some lessons.