PRALAY: India’s New Under Development Conventional Strike Surface-to-Surface Missile

sayareakd

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,953
Country flag
http://www.delhidefencereview.com/2...nventional-strike-surface-to-surface-missile/

Except perhaps for some Prithvi short range ballistic missile (SRBM) units, India’s pool of ballistic missiles (BMs) are essentially meant for strategic strike purposes. With China’s People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) fielding a sizeable inventory of conventionally armed BMs in Tibet, the Indian Army (IA) wants to deploy symmetric counters to the same. At the moment, the only means for the IA to strike targets at distances of close to 500 km is the Brahmos supersonic cruise missile (CM), which though deadly accurate, can carry a payload of only about 200 kg or so, besides being somewhat expensive. As such, the IA in recent times has felt the need for a SRBM with a range of around 500 km that can also carry a sizeable payload. It is to address this requirement that the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) is currently developing a new conventional strike surface to surface missile (SSM) called the Pralay.



The project for the design and development of Pralay was sanctioned in March 2015 for a sum of Rs 332.88 crores. The lead DRDO laboratory for this project is the Research Center Imarat, Hyderabad which has now emerged as a ‘full’ systems laboratory.





The Design

Pralay is essentially a derivative of the PDV exo-atmospheric interceptor with commonality of airframe and some of the avionics as well. Like the PDV, Pralay’s propulsion system too uses solid fuels that can function in a wide range of temperatures and allow the missile to have a long shelf-life. As such, Pralay is a canisterized system that will be able to strike targets out to 500 km with a payload of around 800 kg. The canister itself is probably designed by DRDO’s Advanced Systems Laboratory.



While Pralay’s on-board inertial navigation system (INS) is capable of receiving multi-constellation satellite updates, the missile is believed to have an accuracy of sub-10 metre CEP even without updates to remove accumulated errors. With its PDV heritage, Pralay will be rather maneuverable and capable of quasi-ballistic flight profiles.



Interestingly, if both the PDV and Pralay could be produced in tandem, one could potentially experience greater economies of scale thereby bringing down costs associated with both sets of systems. In a manner of speaking, a part of the total R&D costs of Pralay have in any case been amortized by those expended on developing the PDV interceptor.



The Role

A conventional strike BM, Pralay is supposed to level the playing field for the Indian military in any engagement with the Chinese. While the Indian Air Force (IAF) has the edge in the skies over the People’s Liberation Army Air Force(PLAAF) in various sectors along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) due to the proximity of its bases to the frontier and the fact that they are in the plains, it is also true that Indian airbases are vulnerable to missile attacks by the PLARF. Waves of such attacks could put Indian airbases out of commission for some hours at a stretch and it is important that the IA is not left completely devoid of the means to attack enemy centers of gravity during those periods. Moreover, massed Pralay attacks on Chinese airbases can also serve to curtail the PLAAF’s sortie rate in certain sectors thereby levelling the playing field for the IAF.



When?

Pralay is headed into developmental flight testing at the moment and is expected to be offered for user trials by next year.



Saurav Jha is the Editor-in-Chief of Delhi Defence Review. Follow him on twitter @SJha1618
 

Chinmoy

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,930
Likes
23,094
Country flag
What about Shaurya?

Moreover we need to work on TEL for missiles like Shaurya and Pralay. Instaed of a single missile per TEL, we should work towards developing TEL for multiple missile launch, something like ATACMS.
 

Krusty

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
2,529
Likes
4,873
Country flag
What about Shaurya?

Moreover we need to work on TEL for missiles like Shaurya and Pralay. Instaed of a single missile per TEL, we should work towards developing TEL for multiple missile launch, something like ATACMS.
Companies like Ashok Leyland and TATA should come up with proper TEL vehicles rather than the midified civilian version that we currently use (except the ones supplied by Tatra). Even the Agni ICBM TEL is a regular Ashok leyland truck pulling a trailer! It's a joke! The army deserves better.

IMG_3811.JPG


Compare ours even with paki Babur TEL just for the Babur CM

IMG_3812.JPG


You don't even want to look at the TEL of shaheen
IMG_3813.JPG


High time our TELs are upgraded.
 
Last edited:

acetophenol

New Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Messages
292
Likes
242
Country flag
Companies like Ashok Leyland and TATA should come up with proper TEL vehicles rather than the midified civilian version that we currently use (except the ones supplied by Tatra). Even the Agni ICBM TEL is a regular Ashok leyland truck! It's a joke! The army deserves better.

View attachment 16765

It's a bad joke! Compare ours even with paki Babur TEL just for the Babur CM

View attachment 16766
I 100% agree with you that we need better TELs for our missiles.

But if you are comparing Babur's TEL, you should be doing it with BrahMos or Nirbhay, in both cases, I believe our TELs are good.



 

Krusty

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
2,529
Likes
4,873
Country flag
I 100% agree with you that we need better TELs for our missiles.

But if you are comparing Babur's TEL, you should be doing it with BrahMos or Nirbhay, in both cases, I believe our TELs are good.



That is the 80s tatra 815 (@pmaitra can you confirm if I'm right?). Again, it was designed to be a regular truck first. The chassis is then modified to suit different roles. There are all versions from cranes to firefighting 815 trucks.

Pakistanis are using modern Chinese TELs which are designed to be TELs (but derived from tatra models) from the ground up (better off road ability and performance). Even the smaller Chinese Cruise missile TELs are powered by a 600bhp engine. I think we are using a less powerful cummins version (again, pmaitra sir please confirm and also share your views).

A TEL that's designed ground up to be a TEL is always better than a truck that's converted to a TEL.

Do point out if I'm missing something
 

Mikesingh

New Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
7,353
Likes
30,450
Country flag
Reinventing the wheel? For a range of 500-700km and a 1000kg warhead, the Agni 1's range could have been modified somewhat. It already is fitted with Ring Laser Gyro- INS, optionally augmented by GPS Terminal Guidance. With radar scene correlation the accuracy could be increased to < 10m CEP.

We already have the wherewithal for the Agni series of missiles. This would have resulted in standardization. A new missile would again need an altogether different set of requirements including new assembly lines, testing facilities, storage and so on.

Duh! Or am I missing something here?
 

NeXoft007

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2017
Messages
1,680
Likes
13,509
Country flag
The new Agni 1P will have 800km range.
Pralay is different, with possible Anti-Ship Capability.
 

Aghore_King

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2017
Messages
461
Likes
1,122
Country flag
http://www.delhidefencereview.com/2...nventional-strike-surface-to-surface-missile/

Except perhaps for some Prithvi short range ballistic missile (SRBM) units, India’s pool of ballistic missiles (BMs) are essentially meant for strategic strike purposes. With China’s People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) fielding a sizeable inventory of conventionally armed BMs in Tibet, the Indian Army (IA) wants to deploy symmetric counters to the same. At the moment, the only means for the IA to strike targets at distances of close to 500 km is the Brahmos supersonic cruise missile (CM), which though deadly accurate, can carry a payload of only about 200 kg or so, besides being somewhat expensive. As such, the IA in recent times has felt the need for a SRBM with a range of around 500 km that can also carry a sizeable payload. It is to address this requirement that the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) is currently developing a new conventional strike surface to surface missile (SSM) called the Pralay.



The project for the design and development of Pralay was sanctioned in March 2015 for a sum of Rs 332.88 crores. The lead DRDO laboratory for this project is the Research Center Imarat, Hyderabad which has now emerged as a ‘full’ systems laboratory.





The Design

Pralay is essentially a derivative of the PDV exo-atmospheric interceptor with commonality of airframe and some of the avionics as well. Like the PDV, Pralay’s propulsion system too uses solid fuels that can function in a wide range of temperatures and allow the missile to have a long shelf-life. As such, Pralay is a canisterized system that will be able to strike targets out to 500 km with a payload of around 800 kg. The canister itself is probably designed by DRDO’s Advanced Systems Laboratory.



While Pralay’s on-board inertial navigation system (INS) is capable of receiving multi-constellation satellite updates, the missile is believed to have an accuracy of sub-10 metre CEP even without updates to remove accumulated errors. With its PDV heritage, Pralay will be rather maneuverable and capable of quasi-ballistic flight profiles.



Interestingly, if both the PDV and Pralay could be produced in tandem, one could potentially experience greater economies of scale thereby bringing down costs associated with both sets of systems. In a manner of speaking, a part of the total R&D costs of Pralay have in any case been amortized by those expended on developing the PDV interceptor.



The Role

A conventional strike BM, Pralay is supposed to level the playing field for the Indian military in any engagement with the Chinese. While the Indian Air Force (IAF) has the edge in the skies over the People’s Liberation Army Air Force(PLAAF) in various sectors along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) due to the proximity of its bases to the frontier and the fact that they are in the plains, it is also true that Indian airbases are vulnerable to missile attacks by the PLARF. Waves of such attacks could put Indian airbases out of commission for some hours at a stretch and it is important that the IA is not left completely devoid of the means to attack enemy centers of gravity during those periods. Moreover, massed Pralay attacks on Chinese airbases can also serve to curtail the PLAAF’s sortie rate in certain sectors thereby levelling the playing field for the IAF.



When?

Pralay is headed into developmental flight testing at the moment and is expected to be offered for user trials by next year.



Saurav Jha is the Editor-in-Chief of Delhi Defence Review. Follow him on twitter @SJha1618
Sirr...Isn't the name "Pralay" for a srbm a bit overkill....
 

sayareakd

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,953
Country flag
I think instead of having fancy TEL, i would prefer missiles in standard shipping containers, its easy to hide those from satellites.



Just imagine, with lots of standard shipping containers going up and down its headache for any enemy satellite and tracking.


On the other hand enemy with good satellites and super computers with digital data can identify


This and track its location and hanger or bunkers. Thereafter as these massive trucks needs large curve roads, etc would be easy to track and even destroy. But with standard missile container it will cause headache to enemy.


This is Club/klub missile within shipping container.
 

scatterStorm

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2016
Messages
2,243
Likes
5,360
Country flag
I think instead of having fancy TEL, i would prefer missiles in standard shipping containers, its easy to hide those from satellites.



Just imagine, with lots of standard shipping containers going up and down its headache for any enemy satellite and tracking.


On the other hand enemy with good satellites and super computers with digital data can identify


This and track its location and hanger or bunkers. Thereafter as these massive trucks needs large curve roads, etc would be easy to track and even destroy. But with standard missile container it will cause headache to enemy.


This is Club/klub missile within shipping container.
Russian have been doing it from quite a while now. There Railways have a secretive specialized WMD delivery train which houses Klub, Onix and even Bulava if the need arises and is guarded with S400 systems.
 

abingdonboy

New Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
8,084
Likes
33,803
Country flag
Companies like Ashok Leyland and TATA should come up with proper TEL vehicles rather than the midified civilian version that we currently use (except the ones supplied by Tatra). Even the Agni ICBM TEL is a regular Ashok leyland truck pulling a trailer! It's a joke! The army deserves better.

View attachment 16765

Compare ours even with paki Babur TEL just for the Babur CM

View attachment 16766

You don't even want to look at the TEL of shaheen
View attachment 16767

High time our TELs are upgraded.
I don't think this is such an issue, the reason you go for rugid TELs is to allow them to go offroad but India has no such needs given its large landmass, large road network and long range ICBMs. Furthermore, most Indian land based ICBMs are in fact rail mounted, very few will be employed using a road going TEL.
 

Krusty

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
2,529
Likes
4,873
Country flag
I don't think this is such an issue, the reason you go for rugid TELs is to allow them to go offroad but India has no such needs given its large landmass, large road network and long range ICBMs. Furthermore, most Indian land based ICBMs are in fact rail mounted, very few will be employed using a road going TEL.
Disagree respectfully. China, USA, Russia have large land masses and good transport network. How are their TELs? Having a large road network is no reason for ditching off-road ability and performance.

I agree about the rail. But still, it's no excuse for the TEL meant for all terrain transportation.
 

Willy2

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
847
Likes
1,559
Furthermore, most Indian land based ICBMs are in fact rail mounted, very few will be employed using a road going TEL.
Is there any photo of Indian missile rail-carriage ???? There are many photos of Russian rail-carriage , they are even in museum.
 

Articles

Top