LurkerBaba
Super Mod
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2010
- Messages
- 7,882
- Likes
- 8,125
Threads merged
What do you mean by "IF INDIA WAS ISRAEL" ?If India was Israel, US may be threatning Pakistan not to make more nukes.
Typical nonsense reply.what race, in few years their wont be country called Pakistan.
Welcome to the forum.Typical nonsense indian reply.
Pakistan don't require certificate for its existence from India.
Whether you like it or not, Pakistan is expanding its nuclear arsenal.
Vow you are a genius man, A true genius. Your strategic comments are truly entertaining.no !!!no !!!its paki plan to make 20 ton yield nuke hand grenades and hand over them to their Taliban brothers to bomb NATO convoys and as well IA convoys in J&K and give some to the likes of Hafeez saeed and Lakhvi for distributing the nuke laddooos to Huji,IM and AL-khayedaaa!!!!
Thanks dude.Welcome to the forum.
Lol that is what we want, you guys make as many nuke as you can make.Typical nonsense indian reply.
Pakistan don't require certificate for its existence from India.
Whether you like it or not, Pakistan is expanding its nuclear arsenal.
If Pakistan expands its nuclear arsenal beyond 100 warhead, it surely is threatening its own existence. Then It is a threat to China, Russia, USA, Europe...Typical nonsense reply.
Pakistan don't require certificate for its existence from India.
Whether you like it or not, Pakistan is expanding its nuclear arsenal.
If Pakistan expands its nuclear arsenal beyond 100 warhead, it surely is threatening its own existence. Then It is a threat to China, Russia, USA, Europe...
Pakistani nuclear arsenal remains India specific if confined to ten odd warhead...
Do not think about range, all these countries interests and military operation are within the the range of Pakistani missile...
So have hundreds of warheads and every one gunning for you.
That is a statement on effectiveness, cost and efficacy but nukes are nukes that is to be used to terrorize others as per Paki philosophy. For them since partition, their capacity to terrorize is the supreme deterrentThe nuclear program is still uranium based still very crude and time consuming program.
Indian Govt is to blame for a lot of this, lack of strategic foresight and a lackadasical attitude.That is a statement on effectiveness, cost and efficacy but nukes are nukes that is to be used to terrorize others as per Paki philosophy. For them since partition, their capacity to terrorize is the supreme deterrent
Yah thats our right, by the way you are also free to do so.Lol that is what we want, you guys make as many nuke as you can make.
Thanks for the advice, we know what are our defense and security requirements. Unlike USA and Russia we are not stockpiling 30000+ nukes, we are following a moderate policy keeping in view our requirements.i wont mind it, if you guys go pass US, Russia and China all together.
I told you dude, we dont needs character certificates from you.We too dont need to give any certificate to any one, specially to terrorists.
As i said before, senseless reply, full of hatred. Thats shows your inner self.Pakistani army is your first and last line of defence and it collapse then you wont have much of country to go for.
I agree with you.. That is what happens when one does not have a clear political aim before start of the war. Objectives are not aims but aims detrmine objectives. They say even in 1971, India won military war but lost it on table in Shimla. Same is the case of Tashkent...Indian Govt is to blame for a lot of this, lack of strategic foresight and a lackadasical attitude.
Has brought the present situation. After 4 wars Pakistan has still maintained their Kashmir
positions even after losing the wars says a lot for their Government and a lot about ours.
Hence the attempt in the other thread to come out with clear aims and objectives so that we can actually start a war for a change and achivleve those objectives.I agree with you.. That is what happens when one does not have a clear political aim before start of the war. Objectives are not aims but aims detrmine objectives. They say even in 1971, India won military war but lost it on table in Shimla. Same is the case of Tashkent...
Yes one must have a very clear aim as war should be last thing a nation can plunge into not the first thing like in case of our Paki friends....Hence the attempt in the other thread to come out with clear aims and objectives so that we can actually start a war for a change and achivleve those objectives.
They have a false sense of security in nuclear weapons. The more the merrier it seems for them.@ranasikander
I wish to tell my Paki friend that Nuclear weapons in no longer a guarantee of existence in the present form for a state. Dismemberment of Soviet Union is a proof for that. Nuclear weapons of China is no guarantee of their hold over Tibet and Xinjiang.
There is something called inner strenth which Pakies never promoted or develop. If Baluchisatn gets separated what will hundred nuclear bombs do ??
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Global fears grow as Pakistan expands nuclear capabilities | International Politics | 0 | ||
Pakistan 'expanding nuclear arsenal to deter US attack' | Pakistan | 128 | ||
Pakistan, UK vow to expand defence, economic ties | Pakistan | 0 | ||
Brazil, Pakistan Look To Expand Industrial Ties | International Politics | 14 |