Naxals/Maoists Watch

Should the Indian government use armed forces against the naxals/maoists?


  • Total voters
    423

Anikastha

DEEP STATE
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
5,005
Likes
8,881
Country flag
And who is this fcking varava rao?
Do this guy have any work? Whenever encounter takes place he come out and claim its human rights violation and its fake encounter.
Where was he when CRPF convoys were blown.
Spouses of police officers must visit this guy and thrash him with chappal in public for supporting their hubby's killers.
Sala jab g*nd mein gusegana 20 inch danda tab line pe ayega.
 

sthf

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Messages
2,271
Likes
5,327
Country flag
And who is this fcking varava rao?
Do this guy have any work? Whenever encounter takes place he come out and claim its human rights violation and its fake encounter.
Where was he when CRPF convoys were blown.
Spouses of police officers must visit this guy and thrash him with chappal in public for supporting their hubby's killers.
Sala jab g*nd mein gusegana 20 inch danda tab line pe ayega.
Mouthpiece of naxals masquerading as a "poet". Leave him be. In fact, everytime I see him doing his randi rona, my day gets better.
 

indus

Living in Post Truth
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
5,067
Likes
22,024
Country flag
Urban Naxal phenomenon is very much real. This bitch Nandini Sundar is wife of Siddarth Vadarajan, ex editor of Hindu and founder of Wire.in. Found an old article which is very much relevent till today. Need to find out who the fck is thus Bela Bhatia


Naxal involved in Sukma attack claims DU prof Nalini Sundar, rights activist Bela Bhatia contacted Maoist leadership.

May 18, 2017 13:46:03 IST


A key Maoist cadre, Podiyam Pandu alias Panda, who had recently surrendered to the Chattisgarh Police on 9 May, has now made allegations against Delhi University professor Nandini Sundar and human rights activist Bela Bhatia, according to a report in The Times of India.

Panda, at a press conference in Raipur, claimed that he was the only link between the senior Maoist leaders and urban network of sympathisers and activists, including Bhatia and Sundar. He said that he had, on several occasions escorted them deep into the jungles of Chhattisgarh to meet the top Maoist leaders, who are wanted in various cases.

The key Maoist operative also allegedly confessed to have acted as a courier for the Delhi activists, fetching information and parcels from the Maoist leadership in Bastar and Sukma.

However, Panda's wife Muiyye claims that Panda's surrender and confession was staged. Alleging that Panda has been illegally detained by the police, Muiyye, who is also the sarpanch of Chintagufa village, has moved Chattisgarh High Court with a habeas corpus petition, according to another report in The Times of India. Muiyye claims that the police were neither allowing her to meet her husband nor the family was informed about whereabouts of Panda, adding that the police has even picked up Panda's brother as a pressure tactic to push them to withdraw the case.
Meanwhile, the Delhi University professor has rubbished all accusations made by Panda, according to The Times of India report quoted earlier. Sundar, who is a known face in flagging alleged police 'excesses' against the tribals in the naxal-hit belts, has said that Panda has made the statement under duress. Besides, this is not the first time that Sundar's name has cropped up in cases easily traced back to the red corridor.

In November 2016, Sundar was booked for the murder of a tribal person in the insurgency-hit Sukma district along with charges of rioting and inciting violence. It was alleged that Sundar incited Maoists to murder Shamnath Baghel, a tribal leader who was spearheading a protest against Maoist activities in their village since April, 2016.

Sundar, in her defence had told Firstpost at the timethat action against her was "patently absurd."

“The FIR is patently absurd. How can we be charged with murder and rioting when we are not even there? This is clearly part of IG Kalluri's attempt to intimidate and harass journalists, lawyers, researchers, political leaders and human rights activists who have exposed the reign of fake encounters, gang rapes etc. that are going on in Bastar," she had said at the time. " In particular, this is a direct fall out of the CBI chargesheet of special police officers turned constables for arson in Tadmetla in 2011, an operation which Mr. Kalluri directed,” she added.

Inspector General Shivam Kalluri, referred to by Sundar in the above statement, has been in the news for his slightly over-enthusiastic style of dealing with Maoists. A report in Hindustan Times states, "Kalluri has been in the news for what rights activists describe as his high-handed style in tackling Maoists in the region. He has had several much-publicised run-ins with journalists and is said to have been instrumental in the detention of many of them." The frequent run-ins between Kalluri and journalists even led to the Chhattisgarh government to limit the powers of the police in arresting scribes, the news report states.
Meanwhile, Sukma Superintendent of Police Abhishek Meena said that Panda was a key cadre in the region and has been instrumental in executing several deadly attacks in south Bastar, including the Tadmetla attack wherein 76 troopers were killed (2010) and Kasalpada attack in which 14 CRPF personnel were killed (December 2014).

Panda was also allegedly involved in the attack on CRPF patrolling party on 24 April this year in Burkapal area under Chintagufa police station limits wherein 25 personnel were killed. The ultra was carrying a reward of Rs 1 lakh on his head.

During interrogation, according to the police, Panda revealed that Naxals were keeping an eye on the activities of security forces in Burkapal and Chintagufa axis since 15 April before executing the attack.

Panda had contacted Chintagufa police on 7 May expressing his desire to join the mainstream and later brought to Sukma where he finally turned himself in on 9 May, Meena said.

A native of Chintagufa, Panda has been associated with senior Maoist leaders, including Ramanna, Hidma, Maddana, Paparao and Situ since 1997, and acting as a courier for them for transporting various commodities after procuring it from cities, Meena said.

In 2014, he left his native place and shifted to nearby Minpa village where he started working with Duled Janatana Sarkar squad which was being headed by commander Aayta. Later in 2016, he was elevated as militia deputy commander, he said.

Besides, Panda was also part of the Naxals squad that had kept then Sukma Collector Alex Pual Menon in its captivity in 2012, he added.

Panda also revealed that he had arranged meetings of activists from Delhi with Maoist leaders like Ramanna and Hidma several times in the interior villages of Sukma, the SP said, adding that his surrender is an important achievement for the cops. Police sources told PTI that Panda was also familiar with urban network of Maoists and played a crucial role in arranging meetings of Maoist sympathisers from the town with ultras in jungles. His interrogation may facilitate the arrest of Maoist supporters in urban areas, sources added.
 

avknight1408

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
1,099
Likes
5,014
Country flag
Need to find out who the fck is thus Bela Bhatia
Bela Bhatia is the spouse of this belgian "economist" Jean Drèze. He held top advisory positions in UPA. Every moment they are alive, these left-wing nutjobs pose threat to our country. First should eliminate naxals in jungle and then the urban naxals.
 

AMCA

Senior Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,562
Likes
17,850
Country flag
Urban Naxal phenomenon is very much real. This bitch Nandini Sundar is wife of Siddarth Vadarajan, ex editor of Hindu and founder of Wire.in. Found an old article which is very much relevent till today. Need to find out who the fck is thus Bela Bhatia


Naxal involved in Sukma attack claims DU prof Nalini Sundar, rights activist Bela Bhatia contacted Maoist leadership.

May 18, 2017 13:46:03 IST


A key Maoist cadre, Podiyam Pandu alias Panda, who had recently surrendered to the Chattisgarh Police on 9 May, has now made allegations against Delhi University professor Nandini Sundar and human rights activist Bela Bhatia, according to a report in The Times of India.

Panda, at a press conference in Raipur, claimed that he was the only link between the senior Maoist leaders and urban network of sympathisers and activists, including Bhatia and Sundar. He said that he had, on several occasions escorted them deep into the jungles of Chhattisgarh to meet the top Maoist leaders, who are wanted in various cases.

The key Maoist operative also allegedly confessed to have acted as a courier for the Delhi activists, fetching information and parcels from the Maoist leadership in Bastar and Sukma.

However, Panda's wife Muiyye claims that Panda's surrender and confession was staged. Alleging that Panda has been illegally detained by the police, Muiyye, who is also the sarpanch of Chintagufa village, has moved Chattisgarh High Court with a habeas corpus petition, according to another report in The Times of India. Muiyye claims that the police were neither allowing her to meet her husband nor the family was informed about whereabouts of Panda, adding that the police has even picked up Panda's brother as a pressure tactic to push them to withdraw the case.
Meanwhile, the Delhi University professor has rubbished all accusations made by Panda, according to The Times of India report quoted earlier. Sundar, who is a known face in flagging alleged police 'excesses' against the tribals in the naxal-hit belts, has said that Panda has made the statement under duress. Besides, this is not the first time that Sundar's name has cropped up in cases easily traced back to the red corridor.

In November 2016, Sundar was booked for the murder of a tribal person in the insurgency-hit Sukma district along with charges of rioting and inciting violence. It was alleged that Sundar incited Maoists to murder Shamnath Baghel, a tribal leader who was spearheading a protest against Maoist activities in their village since April, 2016.

Sundar, in her defence had told Firstpost at the timethat action against her was "patently absurd."

“The FIR is patently absurd. How can we be charged with murder and rioting when we are not even there? This is clearly part of IG Kalluri's attempt to intimidate and harass journalists, lawyers, researchers, political leaders and human rights activists who have exposed the reign of fake encounters, gang rapes etc. that are going on in Bastar," she had said at the time. " In particular, this is a direct fall out of the CBI chargesheet of special police officers turned constables for arson in Tadmetla in 2011, an operation which Mr. Kalluri directed,” she added.

Inspector General Shivam Kalluri, referred to by Sundar in the above statement, has been in the news for his slightly over-enthusiastic style of dealing with Maoists. A report in Hindustan Times states, "Kalluri has been in the news for what rights activists describe as his high-handed style in tackling Maoists in the region. He has had several much-publicised run-ins with journalists and is said to have been instrumental in the detention of many of them." The frequent run-ins between Kalluri and journalists even led to the Chhattisgarh government to limit the powers of the police in arresting scribes, the news report states.
Meanwhile, Sukma Superintendent of Police Abhishek Meena said that Panda was a key cadre in the region and has been instrumental in executing several deadly attacks in south Bastar, including the Tadmetla attack wherein 76 troopers were killed (2010) and Kasalpada attack in which 14 CRPF personnel were killed (December 2014).

Panda was also allegedly involved in the attack on CRPF patrolling party on 24 April this year in Burkapal area under Chintagufa police station limits wherein 25 personnel were killed. The ultra was carrying a reward of Rs 1 lakh on his head.

During interrogation, according to the police, Panda revealed that Naxals were keeping an eye on the activities of security forces in Burkapal and Chintagufa axis since 15 April before executing the attack.

Panda had contacted Chintagufa police on 7 May expressing his desire to join the mainstream and later brought to Sukma where he finally turned himself in on 9 May, Meena said.

A native of Chintagufa, Panda has been associated with senior Maoist leaders, including Ramanna, Hidma, Maddana, Paparao and Situ since 1997, and acting as a courier for them for transporting various commodities after procuring it from cities, Meena said.

In 2014, he left his native place and shifted to nearby Minpa village where he started working with Duled Janatana Sarkar squad which was being headed by commander Aayta. Later in 2016, he was elevated as militia deputy commander, he said.

Besides, Panda was also part of the Naxals squad that had kept then Sukma Collector Alex Pual Menon in its captivity in 2012, he added.

Panda also revealed that he had arranged meetings of activists from Delhi with Maoist leaders like Ramanna and Hidma several times in the interior villages of Sukma, the SP said, adding that his surrender is an important achievement for the cops. Police sources told PTI that Panda was also familiar with urban network of Maoists and played a crucial role in arranging meetings of Maoist sympathisers from the town with ultras in jungles. His interrogation may facilitate the arrest of Maoist supporters in urban areas, sources added.
So....a press conference was held by a surrendered naxalite......................Looks like someone is working to dismantle urban naxal network in a very co-ordinated way...........
 

Anikastha

DEEP STATE
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
5,005
Likes
8,881
Country flag
Urban Naxal phenomenon is very much real. This bitch Nandini Sundar is wife of Siddarth Vadarajan, ex editor of Hindu and founder of Wire.in. Found an old article which is very much relevent till today. Need to find out who the fck is thus Bela Bhatia


Naxal involved in Sukma attack claims DU prof Nalini Sundar, rights activist Bela Bhatia contacted Maoist leadership.

May 18, 2017 13:46:03 IST


A key Maoist cadre, Podiyam Pandu alias Panda, who had recently surrendered to the Chattisgarh Police on 9 May, has now made allegations against Delhi University professor Nandini Sundar and human rights activist Bela Bhatia, according to a report in The Times of India.

Panda, at a press conference in Raipur, claimed that he was the only link between the senior Maoist leaders and urban network of sympathisers and activists, including Bhatia and Sundar. He said that he had, on several occasions escorted them deep into the jungles of Chhattisgarh to meet the top Maoist leaders, who are wanted in various cases.

The key Maoist operative also allegedly confessed to have acted as a courier for the Delhi activists, fetching information and parcels from the Maoist leadership in Bastar and Sukma.

However, Panda's wife Muiyye claims that Panda's surrender and confession was staged. Alleging that Panda has been illegally detained by the police, Muiyye, who is also the sarpanch of Chintagufa village, has moved Chattisgarh High Court with a habeas corpus petition, according to another report in The Times of India. Muiyye claims that the police were neither allowing her to meet her husband nor the family was informed about whereabouts of Panda, adding that the police has even picked up Panda's brother as a pressure tactic to push them to withdraw the case.
Meanwhile, the Delhi University professor has rubbished all accusations made by Panda, according to The Times of India report quoted earlier. Sundar, who is a known face in flagging alleged police 'excesses' against the tribals in the naxal-hit belts, has said that Panda has made the statement under duress. Besides, this is not the first time that Sundar's name has cropped up in cases easily traced back to the red corridor.

In November 2016, Sundar was booked for the murder of a tribal person in the insurgency-hit Sukma district along with charges of rioting and inciting violence. It was alleged that Sundar incited Maoists to murder Shamnath Baghel, a tribal leader who was spearheading a protest against Maoist activities in their village since April, 2016.

Sundar, in her defence had told Firstpost at the timethat action against her was "patently absurd."

“The FIR is patently absurd. How can we be charged with murder and rioting when we are not even there? This is clearly part of IG Kalluri's attempt to intimidate and harass journalists, lawyers, researchers, political leaders and human rights activists who have exposed the reign of fake encounters, gang rapes etc. that are going on in Bastar," she had said at the time. " In particular, this is a direct fall out of the CBI chargesheet of special police officers turned constables for arson in Tadmetla in 2011, an operation which Mr. Kalluri directed,” she added.

Inspector General Shivam Kalluri, referred to by Sundar in the above statement, has been in the news for his slightly over-enthusiastic style of dealing with Maoists. A report in Hindustan Times states, "Kalluri has been in the news for what rights activists describe as his high-handed style in tackling Maoists in the region. He has had several much-publicised run-ins with journalists and is said to have been instrumental in the detention of many of them." The frequent run-ins between Kalluri and journalists even led to the Chhattisgarh government to limit the powers of the police in arresting scribes, the news report states.
Meanwhile, Sukma Superintendent of Police Abhishek Meena said that Panda was a key cadre in the region and has been instrumental in executing several deadly attacks in south Bastar, including the Tadmetla attack wherein 76 troopers were killed (2010) and Kasalpada attack in which 14 CRPF personnel were killed (December 2014).

Panda was also allegedly involved in the attack on CRPF patrolling party on 24 April this year in Burkapal area under Chintagufa police station limits wherein 25 personnel were killed. The ultra was carrying a reward of Rs 1 lakh on his head.

During interrogation, according to the police, Panda revealed that Naxals were keeping an eye on the activities of security forces in Burkapal and Chintagufa axis since 15 April before executing the attack.

Panda had contacted Chintagufa police on 7 May expressing his desire to join the mainstream and later brought to Sukma where he finally turned himself in on 9 May, Meena said.

A native of Chintagufa, Panda has been associated with senior Maoist leaders, including Ramanna, Hidma, Maddana, Paparao and Situ since 1997, and acting as a courier for them for transporting various commodities after procuring it from cities, Meena said.

In 2014, he left his native place and shifted to nearby Minpa village where he started working with Duled Janatana Sarkar squad which was being headed by commander Aayta. Later in 2016, he was elevated as militia deputy commander, he said.

Besides, Panda was also part of the Naxals squad that had kept then Sukma Collector Alex Pual Menon in its captivity in 2012, he added.

Panda also revealed that he had arranged meetings of activists from Delhi with Maoist leaders like Ramanna and Hidma several times in the interior villages of Sukma, the SP said, adding that his surrender is an important achievement for the cops. Police sources told PTI that Panda was also familiar with urban network of Maoists and played a crucial role in arranging meetings of Maoist sympathisers from the town with ultras in jungles. His interrogation may facilitate the arrest of Maoist supporters in urban areas, sources added.
We SC ask this women to undergo lie detection test?
Every thing will be sorted with in minutes.
 

apoorv465

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2016
Messages
1,025
Likes
6,426
Country flag
Urban Naxal phenomenon is very much real. This bitch Nandini Sundar is wife of Siddarth Vadarajan, ex editor of Hindu and founder of Wire.in. Found an old article which is very much relevent till today. Need to find out who the fck is thus Bela Bhatia


Naxal involved in Sukma attack claims DU prof Nalini Sundar, rights activist Bela Bhatia contacted Maoist leadership.

May 18, 2017 13:46:03 IST


A key Maoist cadre, Podiyam Pandu alias Panda, who had recently surrendered to the Chattisgarh Police on 9 May, has now made allegations against Delhi University professor Nandini Sundar and human rights activist Bela Bhatia, according to a report in The Times of India.

Panda, at a press conference in Raipur, claimed that he was the only link between the senior Maoist leaders and urban network of sympathisers and activists, including Bhatia and Sundar. He said that he had, on several occasions escorted them deep into the jungles of Chhattisgarh to meet the top Maoist leaders, who are wanted in various cases.

The key Maoist operative also allegedly confessed to have acted as a courier for the Delhi activists, fetching information and parcels from the Maoist leadership in Bastar and Sukma.

However, Panda's wife Muiyye claims that Panda's surrender and confession was staged. Alleging that Panda has been illegally detained by the police, Muiyye, who is also the sarpanch of Chintagufa village, has moved Chattisgarh High Court with a habeas corpus petition, according to another report in The Times of India. Muiyye claims that the police were neither allowing her to meet her husband nor the family was informed about whereabouts of Panda, adding that the police has even picked up Panda's brother as a pressure tactic to push them to withdraw the case.
Meanwhile, the Delhi University professor has rubbished all accusations made by Panda, according to The Times of India report quoted earlier. Sundar, who is a known face in flagging alleged police 'excesses' against the tribals in the naxal-hit belts, has said that Panda has made the statement under duress. Besides, this is not the first time that Sundar's name has cropped up in cases easily traced back to the red corridor.

In November 2016, Sundar was booked for the murder of a tribal person in the insurgency-hit Sukma district along with charges of rioting and inciting violence. It was alleged that Sundar incited Maoists to murder Shamnath Baghel, a tribal leader who was spearheading a protest against Maoist activities in their village since April, 2016.

Sundar, in her defence had told Firstpost at the timethat action against her was "patently absurd."

“The FIR is patently absurd. How can we be charged with murder and rioting when we are not even there? This is clearly part of IG Kalluri's attempt to intimidate and harass journalists, lawyers, researchers, political leaders and human rights activists who have exposed the reign of fake encounters, gang rapes etc. that are going on in Bastar," she had said at the time. " In particular, this is a direct fall out of the CBI chargesheet of special police officers turned constables for arson in Tadmetla in 2011, an operation which Mr. Kalluri directed,” she added.

Inspector General Shivam Kalluri, referred to by Sundar in the above statement, has been in the news for his slightly over-enthusiastic style of dealing with Maoists. A report in Hindustan Times states, "Kalluri has been in the news for what rights activists describe as his high-handed style in tackling Maoists in the region. He has had several much-publicised run-ins with journalists and is said to have been instrumental in the detention of many of them." The frequent run-ins between Kalluri and journalists even led to the Chhattisgarh government to limit the powers of the police in arresting scribes, the news report states.
Meanwhile, Sukma Superintendent of Police Abhishek Meena said that Panda was a key cadre in the region and has been instrumental in executing several deadly attacks in south Bastar, including the Tadmetla attack wherein 76 troopers were killed (2010) and Kasalpada attack in which 14 CRPF personnel were killed (December 2014).

Panda was also allegedly involved in the attack on CRPF patrolling party on 24 April this year in Burkapal area under Chintagufa police station limits wherein 25 personnel were killed. The ultra was carrying a reward of Rs 1 lakh on his head.

During interrogation, according to the police, Panda revealed that Naxals were keeping an eye on the activities of security forces in Burkapal and Chintagufa axis since 15 April before executing the attack.

Panda had contacted Chintagufa police on 7 May expressing his desire to join the mainstream and later brought to Sukma where he finally turned himself in on 9 May, Meena said.

A native of Chintagufa, Panda has been associated with senior Maoist leaders, including Ramanna, Hidma, Maddana, Paparao and Situ since 1997, and acting as a courier for them for transporting various commodities after procuring it from cities, Meena said.

In 2014, he left his native place and shifted to nearby Minpa village where he started working with Duled Janatana Sarkar squad which was being headed by commander Aayta. Later in 2016, he was elevated as militia deputy commander, he said.

Besides, Panda was also part of the Naxals squad that had kept then Sukma Collector Alex Pual Menon in its captivity in 2012, he added.

Panda also revealed that he had arranged meetings of activists from Delhi with Maoist leaders like Ramanna and Hidma several times in the interior villages of Sukma, the SP said, adding that his surrender is an important achievement for the cops. Police sources told PTI that Panda was also familiar with urban network of Maoists and played a crucial role in arranging meetings of Maoist sympathisers from the town with ultras in jungles. His interrogation may facilitate the arrest of Maoist supporters in urban areas, sources added.
Nalini Sundar was also the one who filed a PIL in Chattisgarh against Salwa Judum and helped dismantle it, Salwa Judum were highly successful in eliminating naxals.
 

AMCA

Senior Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,562
Likes
17,850
Country flag
‘Maoists call urban mass organisations weapons … battle is for control of civil society through subversion’
May 2, 2018, 2:00 AM IST TOI Q&A in The Interviews Blog | Edit Page, India, Q&A | TOI

In popular perception, Maoists mainly operate in districts with a large tribal population. Smita Gaikwad, a former army officer who is now a research scholar with Mumbai-based thinktank Forum for Integrated National Security (FINS), disagrees in a conversation with Sugandha Indulkar:



Why do you believe urban centres are the next big battlefield?

This is a reality with concrete evidence. Maoists reside in urban areas. In fact, youth from urban/ semi-urban areas had started Maoist movement in India. Maoism cannot survive without urban leadership and logistical support. In November 2013, MHA (home ministry) filed an affidavit in Supreme Court acknowledging that “the ‘frontal’ organisations of CPI (Maoist), operating under the pretext of human rights NGOs, have kept the Maoist movement alive and are more dangerous than armed cadres.” CPI (ML) People’s War and MCCI (Maoist Communist Centre of India) merged into a single party, the CPI (Maoist), on September 21, 2004.

After this merger they drafted five basic strategy documents for CPI (Maoist) party. One document includes: ‘Urban perspective: Our work in urban areas’. In this document you will find their urban plan discussed in an elaborate manner. Similarly, in their document titled: ‘Strategy and tactics of Indian revolution’, they mention that their party, which comprises armed cadre, and united front of mass organisations in urban areas are their ‘weapons’. It is important to note that they describe urban mass organisations as ‘weapons’ to overthrow democracy.

How do we combat Maoists without undermining people who are genuine and only want constitutional rights enforced?

The only way to combat urban Maoists is through legal action. As security agencies generally have concrete inputs, identifying and isolating the urban Maoist cadre from genuine democratic social activists and taking necessary legal actions is possible. The case of convicted Maoist prof GN Saibaba is the best example. They do not believe in constitutional democracy. They then tie up with a lot of terror outfits, pose a threat to life and freedom of many people across the nation. They indulge in a lot of criminal activities as well.

Maoists strategically penetrate existing NGOs, human rights organisations and other social or political organisations and steer these organisations to align with their Maoist agenda. Similarly, apart from their secret organisations, they also float various organisations which fit in the democratic framework and work to implement Maoist strategies.

Is Maoism in tribal areas only a symptom of governance weaknesses?

The socio-economic situation or governance weakness in tribal areas made the work of Maoists easy in in the 1970s and 80s. Maoism hasn’t sprung from governance weaknesses alone, it is a bigger problem. CPI (Maoist) is a banned terrorist organisation.

If we refer to statistics from START (Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism) and South Asian terrorism portal, CPI (Maoist) has figured in top five terrorist groups globally for many years. They have been exploiting weakness of the government to further their cause of overthrowing democracy. Their aim is ‘political power through the barrel of the gun’ and not through electoral process. Experts say that it is a classical model of fourth generation warfare (4GW) – where the enemy is invisible, and the battle is for the control of civil society throughsubversion.

Do you believe that foreign nations help Maoists?

I do not have any evidence to prove this. But when we interviewed a surrendered Maoist in Bastar – who was involved in the Sukma blast where nine CRPF jawans were killed – we came to know that after that operation they had received calls from different countries. This shows they do have international links.

Will killing tribal Maoists while allowing urban Maoists to go on with their activities help?

Tribals have been used as cannon fodder by Maoist leadership. They hardly have representation in the central committee. During encounters, tribal foot soldiers are pushed in front while higher Maoist leadership stays away from encounter sites. Higher Maoist leadership is also responsible for a large number of tribal killings.

Maoism survives and thrives on three weapons that they mention in their party documents: Leadership from intellectual class in urban areas, armed cadre in forests and united fronts of mass organisations. Out of these three weapons, two come from urban areas. It is as necessary to stop Maoist urban activities as those in forests.

How is it to be done?

The first and most important thing is that society should accept that a problem of urban Maoism exists. Second, proper investigations in cases of urban Maoists can help in improving the conviction rate of judicial cases of urban Maoism. Third, Maoists are penetrating organisations working for special sections of the society such as Dalits, women, minorities, tribals, et al. Maoists prey upon the vulnerability of such people. Focussed efforts in solving problems of these sections can prevent that from happening.
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,176
Sukma-Konta area committee member of the CPI (Maoist), Soyam Kama, killed in an encounter with security forces. Involved in more than 50 attacks, carried a reward of 5 lakhs on his head.
How did this fucker get a hand on INSAS
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,176
Man I love how we didn't lose even a single jawan in all recent operation. Just love it hope we innovate more and eliminate even more naxals in similar manner.
 

indus

Living in Post Truth
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
5,067
Likes
22,024
Country flag
Man I love how we didn't lose even a single jawan in all recent operation. Just love it hope we innovate more and eliminate even more naxals in similar manner.
And Mrs Brinda Karat was wondering why is that so. How come no one from crpf/ police was dead and only the naxals killed. For more details read her Op in Rndtv.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

Articles

Top