mcpo117
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
- Messages
- 1,099
- Likes
- 2,270
actually I would be utterly surprised if they didn't use fiberglass in 2080. Such unbecoming.Le indian in 2080 with there fiber glass helmets..
actually I would be utterly surprised if they didn't use fiberglass in 2080. Such unbecoming.Le indian in 2080 with there fiber glass helmets..
One question do sepoy get money from army to purchase equipment for themselves?a sepoy gets somewhere between 20-25k, not sure what all he can afford in that
Why did the IA never follow up with orders for ACH? Still using model 1974s for what reason?
Because the ACH didn't fulfill the requirements. They were found inadequate against the hard steel core and enhanced performance rounds in J&K. As a stopgap measure they were fitted with ceramic add on plates (all or some I don't know). Therefore the army had recieved a RFI to purchase new ballistic helmetsWhy did the IA never follow up with orders for ACH? Still using model 1974s for what reason?
They issued RFIs for ‘advanced’ helmets which has gone the way of every RFI…
why is this army unable to order enough to meet their requirements on anything? Everything is piecemeal
AFAIK, ACH fulfilled the requirement.Because the ACH didn't fulfill the requirements. They were found inadequate against the hard steel core and enhanced performance rounds in J&K. As a stopgap measure they were fitted with ceramic add on plates (all or some I don't know). Therefore the army had recieved a RFI to purchase new ballistic helmets
They may have fulfilled the requirements at trials, but failed to protect against steel core bullets in JK, which is why some went back to the patka, some mixed the ACH and patkaAFAIK, ACH fulfilled the requirement.
Later, they changed the RFP.
Army should understand good quality comes with the price.
Were they spec’d to stop steel core rounds in the first place? Never.Because the ACH didn't fulfill the requirements. They were found inadequate against the hard steel core and enhanced performance rounds in J&K. As a stopgap measure they were fitted with ceramic add on plates (all or some I don't know). Therefore the army had recieved a RFI to purchase new ballistic helmets
1974 fiber helmets you will find them in 2040s toos at the speed we are going absolutely sad state of affairs especially when you have world class companies producing them here in ur own backyard gives you 0 excuse to use those in 2023.Were they spec’d to stop steel core rounds in the first place? Never.
until recently most helmets on the market were only designed to stop 9mm rounds
i guess the model 1974 with 0 ballistic protection is fine though
You have the 2016 RFI? And why should the army order something which they found inadequate for their requirements with extra add ons when they can get what they want from the market?Were they spec’d to stop steel core rounds in the first place? Never.
until recently most helmets on the market were only designed to stop 9mm rounds
i guess the model 1974 with 0 ballistic protection is fine though
Ok agreed they found them indequate but that was 2016 right? Now is 2023 that too is about to end when mku like industry giant is here in your country that is exporting to alot of Nations and you can't even replace ur old helmets after 2016 that shouldn't be exceptable.You have the 2016 RFI? And why should the army order something which they found inadequate for their requirements with extra add ons when they can get what they want from the market?
You are correct.They may have fulfilled the requirements at trials, but failed to protect against steel core bullets in JK, which is why some went back to the patka, some mixed the ACH and patka
LMAO
What puzzles me is how they still haven’t standardized the Patka. Some chaps prefer patka, which is okay.Why did the IA never follow up with orders for ACH? Still using model 1974s for what reason?
They issued RFIs for ‘advanced’ helmets which has gone the way of every RFI…
why is this army unable to order enough to meet their requirements on anything? Everything is piecemeal
But why our guys in Russia have a matching helmet camo while those in usa don't ?What puzzles me is how they still haven’t standardized the Patka. Some chaps prefer patka, which is okay.
Even this is not standardized .MF just bloody standardizeView attachment 224386 this it’s not that fucking hard holy fuck
Patka is heavy and doesn’t offer top cover shrapnel protection. It’s jugaad that works just about in COIN but as a battle helmet? It’s a joke.What puzzles me is how they still haven’t standardized the Patka. Some chaps prefer patka, which is okay.
FairPatka is heavy and doesn’t offer top cover shrapnel protection. It’s jugaad that works just about in COIN but as a battle helmet? It’s a joke.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Indian Army Says Its New Artillery Chief "Spearheaded Artillery Modernisation". | Indian Army | 8 | ||
Modernisation for Indian 105mm Light Field Guns. | Indian Army | 91 | ||
Update On Indian Navy Force Modernisation | Indian Navy | 14 | ||
How Indian Navy is expanding and modernising | Indian Navy | 0 |