The lessons are clear and IAF Chief itself stated that If we had Rafales things will be different ,
AMRAAM outgunned our R77 and Su 30 MKI comes close ,
These 100 plus KM ranges for super duper western air to air missiles are just ballistic ranges.
In reality no AAM has the kinetic energy to be effective beyond 40 Km or so.
This was demonstrated by PAF F16 cowboys , (who didnt hv the balls to engage su30MKI at close ranges),
Whose max range AMRAAM AIM 120 c salvos were simply shrugged off by IAF su 30 mki, which continued to hold its ground over army brigade hQ .
Meteor may hv dual pulse motor.
But its no escape range (there is no such thing as no escape area, in future,which is the stuff fr another thread) is certainly not the advertised ballistic range of around 150 km.
Its the tactics & battlespace awareness plus pilot training , which uses air assets in an effective manner is what determines who wins.
JF17 hving super duper250 km range ASEA wont change anything .because their SL XX (like AMRAAM) too will be shrugged off by IAF fighters.
Tejas is a definitive reliable cutting edge finished product.
No use intimidating IT with AESA JF17.
IAF chief 's statement is a mystery to me.
Thete was an AirAsia civilian plane near the air battle theater.
So SU30 MKIs were forbidden from taking BVR shots.
Even if rafales were there, same rules of engagements will apply.
Thats why Abhinabdhan went WVR to hit F16.
The fact that his 60 yr old tech mig21 couldnt be shot down before it got into & achieved an F16 kill,
In airspace filled with ,"100 km range "AMRAAM, brings some home truth on tech & tactics