- Joined
- Jun 19, 2020
- Messages
- 2,735
- Likes
- 5,773
No RV Mark 1, it probably is an stealth version of LCA Teja's or a single engine AMCA's so RV Mark 2.And RV mark 1?
No RV Mark 1, it probably is an stealth version of LCA Teja's or a single engine AMCA's so RV Mark 2.And RV mark 1?
Well actually that deal for su30 and mig29 was also long coming . It was in works for 2-3 years. It became urgent because without ordering more su30 to be build this year our su30 line will become idle.If Covid delayed the signing by 2-3 months compared to previous expectation, then can we assume Bats encroaching our border didn't accelerate the timeline like it did to Su30MKI and Mig29? Even as a standalone order, #aatmanirbhar has no effect in signing the deal faster?
Be your own judge!!
Costly to operate and will need engine development in the range of 150 KN's to 200 KN's thrust's.Some thing like this View attachment 53297
Amca is still on ETMD stage's, so can't say's.See my point is amca estimated cost assumed to be say Round about 100-110 m
It doesn't actually has to be the same design I mean tailless yes, my thinking is differenT ,it will be smaller yes lighter yes you don't have to go with full stealth, say if we develop this with say a ferry range of 3800-4200 ferry range, with say a combat radius of 1100-1200 km and say range of 2500-2600 km, and even with overall package say we can keep the cost low not a bad deal TBH, my take on this is Pakistan is not far away plus with China the war will be fought on western sector,so this might not be a bad idea besides this could also add as a number multiplier and also manufacturing this will be more faster and with mass production we can surely bring the cost down say 216 f+54 trainers,what do you think.Costly to operate and will need engine development in the range of 150 KN's to 200 KN's thrust's.
It will be 90-100 for sure.Amca is still on ETMD stage's, so can't say's.
I think by then we could do thatCostly to operate and will need engine development in the range of 150 KN's to 200 KN's thrust's.
The cost could be equivalent to tejas due to reduced cost's of stealth aircraft's.Say if the cost of alca is 75-80 m and if we say order it say 270(216+54) might not be a bad idea TBH
The SU 57 E could cost as same as SU 35.Why do you think Russia is looking for a 5th gen light weight fighter
J doubt it's that stealthy though.The SU 57 E could cost as same as SU 35.
Our startegy of 45 squadrons is flawed we counld need as much as 70 squadron's to take on China's.What we need is a number multiplier, and what better way than to add a 5th gen light fighter
It's will become more stealthy with the constant development's for sure.J doubt it's that stealthy though.
though I feel with mass production we can at least say 2-2.5 billionEven if it costs you say 80 will be around 22b
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
LCA Tejas: Photos & Footages (no text other than headings) | Military Multimedia | 87 | ||
LCA TEJAS and what makes it stand out | Knowledge Repository | 8 | ||
W | Rise of LCA Tejas Multi Role Fighter Aircraft | Indian Air Force | 23 | |
C | LRUs or parts of LCA Tejas Made and designed in India | Indian Air Force | 16 |