Japan Self Defense Forces - Pictures & Videos

Damian

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
4,836
Likes
2,183
11 million USD beast...

Damn, 11 million USD?! This thing is overexpensive for such a small tank, that is not better protected than modern NATO or Russian/Ukrainian equivalents that are also sufficent enough in electronics.

Or Japanese made just a mobile box with a gun for a super computer so price is so high, or reason is that not many of them will be made.

AFAIK Germans calculated that to counterbalance money spent on R&D, around 1,000-2,000 tanks need to be purchased by own armed forces.
 

asianobserve

Senior Member
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
10,438
Likes
5,379
Country flag
It's a government doll out to its defense contractors to keep their know-hows and technological expertise alive (or improve them), for employment and of course national prestige.

Regarding the armor protection of the tank, historically defense has never been the forte of the Japanese military. Their's is offence centered and their soldiers are supposed to win or if they can't then die trying. That's why firepower, targeting systems and speed are favored over armor. They're suppose to hit hard and fast. I think, at least in their MBTs, this is still true now.
 

Damian

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
4,836
Likes
2,183
It's a government doll out to its defense contractors to keep their know-hows and technological expertise alive (or improve them), for employment and of course national prestige.
Thesy should allow for exports, I suspect that at least in that region, there would be possible to sell their weapon systems.

Regarding the armor protection of the tank, historically defense has never been the forte of the Japanese military. Their's is offence centered and their soldiers are supposed to win or if they can't then die trying. That's why firepower, targeting systems and speed are favored over armor. They're suppose to hit hard and fast. I think, at least in their MBTs, this is still true now.
As for the armor protection I did not have in mind quality of armor itself. This tank definetly have high tech armor. Problematic is it's placement. What I mean by this is that front armor might be very weight and space efficent, thus with less weight allows at least to achieve protection similiar to that of heavier vehicles. Another weight reduction comes with use of nano technology in materials manufacturing.

However problematic is side protection, neither hull sides, neighter turret are protected by composite armor, only light weight non ballistic skirts, and storage boxes. In theory both can be replaced by armor modules but, at least for now I didn't seen anything like that.

Other than that it is very advanced and interesting vehicle. I really like it's powerpack design, something worth to integrate in other MBT's, especially transmission.

The most interesting is that crew both TC and gunner do not have traditional sights oculars, but everything is displayed on flat screens, it gives some interesting possibilities, however I wonder how robust this solution is when it comes to situation when vehicle is hit by kinetic energy round and there is no armor perforation.

Oh and suspension, I'am a big enthusiast of hydrogas suspension systems, be it these with or without variable height control. This is future, and gives many, many profits in vehicle design compared to heavier and taking more space torsion bars, or very heavy and bulky suspension systems like Horstmann or it's more modern incarnations seen on Merkava series.
 
Last edited:

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,571
No offence mate but the Sheridan is not a true MBT... It's an air dropable light tank.
You are correct, the last light tank in service with the US Army, replaced by the M60A1 and eventually the M3 Bradley for the Recon role.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top