- Joined
- Jun 5, 2017
- Messages
- 16,330
- Likes
- 70,176
Nepal is a complex case this is Indian economy thread so anything related to Nepal unless directly related to India economy should be taken to it's respective threads
Tourism?Only thing I can guess is Tourism.
Nepal has no major natural resource and no major industry nor does it grow anything valuable that already isn't being transported via road.
I don't know why this guy keeps obsessing with it.
Things became cosy between US and China from the events following Ping-Pong diplomacy. On surface level they may talk sh*t about each other but at the backend they have been doing business together since 4 decades now.Not necessarily, In sequence of events china's economy liberalised 17 years ahead of us.
Secondly India's recognition as suppliers of IT workers for the world was a coincidence, thanks to Y2K.
Thirdly Pakistan is the match maker between USA and China in late 60's, both have been co-ordinating since then.
and lastly, US always believed we are in Russia camp, even today to an extent.
No matter what we offer, match fixing between US and China was already done. After Japan's economy started stagnating in late 90's, US simply shifted their interests to China next door.
You are right,there is no point in crying about the past but one should learn from it so that you don't make the same mistakes in the future....could have would have doesn’t work in real life, if we take this path of reasoning, we can go keep going back up to Islamic invasions.
We can’t change neither the past nor associated ground realities, it is what it is. Past has already been written, future is yet to be written. Can only learn from the past.
That's too big and open ended a question to answer, pick a topic so that we both can look at it in a unbiased manner to arrive to a conclusion.The question is, has India learned anything from the giant mishandling of the past 30 years ?
We have grown the fastest we ever have in these last 30 years and are on the cusp of becoming an economic powerhouse just continue thatYou are right,there is no point in crying about the past but one should learn from it so that you don't make the same mistakes in the future....
The question is, has India learned anything from the giant mishandling of the past 30 years ?
With a per capita income in bottom 25% quantile ,a revenue generation lower than tiny italy and an economy the size of UK despite 20X population, I wouldn't call India an economic powerhouse.We have grown the fastest we ever have in these last 30 years and are on the cusp of becoming an economic powerhouse just continue that
A little bit of correction superpowers can mean many different thing.We have grown the fastest we ever have in these last 30 years and are on the cusp of becoming an economic powerhouse just continue that
you can talk about employment and job creationThat's too big and open ended a question to answer, pick a topic so that we both can look at it in a unbiased manner to arrive to a conclusion.
Scamster yahan tak aa gya...SpaceX to partner with Indian companies to manufacture satellite communications gear
“SpaceX is excited to find ways to work together with the Indian industry for manufacturing products for its Starlink devices,” said director Matt Botwinwww.businesstoday.in
Take it with lots of Salt,. Its BIHAR.Bihar government to provide free office space to emerging IT startups
PATNA: The Nitish Kumar government has launched the ‘Invest IT Bihar’ campaign that aims at encouraging investors and entrepreneurs to invest in the IT sector owww.newindianexpress.com
@Chandragupt Maurya
what's your take on this? is there a assumption that something is not upto the mark?you can talk about employment and job creation
That is incorrect.When labor become costly and manufacturing lower cost items became infeasible in US, all companies ran to China only. You can attribute this to the Efficient bureaucracy of China, all CCP members were kind of getting commissions based on how much work they can manage to pull into China from US.
what's your take on this? is there a assumption that something is not upto the mark?
He didn't mean it by naive approach of oversimplifying to only top layer of topic but asking you specific. Since you picked China here, your topics would be economic diversification and rapid industrialisation and not the inefficient way of job creations and subsidies what a failed socialist nation usually does (just for the sake of creative jobs). It also includes eras of jobless growths sometimes.you can talk about employment and job creation