@Haldiram bruh do u believe that there are crooks even in the CBI
Crooks vs non-crooks is a very harsh binary. All institutional departments of any nation-state are extensions of the executive. And since the executive is politically appointed, all arms of the state and all decisions they make are political in nature (and it is perfectly alright). If people feel that they are not being delivered justice, it is the party in power that gets booted out, so it is their prerogative to make politically motivated appointments to head bureaucratic institutions which allegedly claim to be 'apolitical'. I think it is the privilege of the party in power to appoint people who are loyal to them, in order to deliver the kind of system they want to.
These 'crooks' being referred to right now are all erstwhile Congress appointees trying to stall the new ones from delivering good governance. They're doing it with the hope that there will be mass public disaffection and the Congress will be back in power and they'll be benefited.
Check the Indrani Mukharjee case. Now evidence has surfaced showing that she is linked to Karti Chidambaram and yet, the CBI or ED didn't do anything when the UPA was in power. Now the CBI is asking for narco-analysis of Karti. What does that say about the CBI? even the previous CBI director Ranjit Sinha was caught indulging in shady behavior. Even the IAF chiefs is under investigation today.
Just two days ago, ICICI's Chanda Kocchar has been summoned by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. She enjoyed great popularity during the UPA tenure. No government agency caught her during UPA tenure, despite knowing everything.
No one is above reproach. All agencies are political in nature.
