mayfair
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 6,032
- Likes
- 13,109
Once again we do not know how much was destroyed, but as RAW reports directly to the PMO, they cannot keep everything secret. Political leaders DO come to know of secrets that we do not. This is what allowed Pinky Bhutto to hand over the list of Khalistanis to India under the ISI noses. RAW is far more pliable and while we can debate over semantics, it has been acknowledged that Gujral by sharing the details of RAW ops in Shitistan, caused immense damage to the overall network.It does not mean that they will declare their assets to politicians. No department in the world declares. They may declare something but of no value.
It's not just the agents compromised, but the fear, uncertainty and a sense of betrayal that makes future recruitment difficult.
Morarji Desai did not tell Zia Ul haq our agents names in Shitistan, but he told the bastard that he was aware of their weapons programme and how much they had progressed. It was enough for Zia to narrow down and our man Ravinder Kaushik was found out. He wouldn't have been found out even then, if someone in the hierarchy had not dispatched a clumsy asset to contact him. Read the story.
Leader does not have to create a report. He can demand info and summarily dismiss those who do not comply. As much as they can be sanitised, if the higher ups are hell bent, you cannot save all the info.Yes no doubt in that but they are able to do so because the bureaucrats under them support them. Finally a leader himself never creates a report it comes through a channel. Without a sign of all the officers any notice or order cannot be generated.
Even if most junior grade one officer objects to it, a leader fails to proceed unless until that officer is transferred.
This is how it works.
If Dulat was anything like he's today back then, then it was a disaster. His negotiation is giving Kashmiri Sunni Muslims the right to self-determination and pardoning all the terrorists. I shudder at the amount of dmaage hu must have caused.Dulat was a good negotiator so they tried this also.
That makes no sense at all. There were multiple failures and multiple self-goals in the quest of personal glory and self-aggrandisation. All this hiding behind civilian government is hogwash. Only under three PMs, India's intelligence apparatus against terrorism has been severely compromised.I don't say that there were no problems and there was no failure but in the end you land to a conclusion that a civilian govt when deals with military state then the civilian govt then you cannot expect it to work like a military state. And take decision like PA does.
1. Morarji Desai- RAW/IB in Kahuta
2. I K Gujral- RAW in Shitistan
3. Manmohan Singh- TSD.
And these civvies were ably assisted by the likes of Bikram Singh in the uniform. Even JJ Singh was on board with army withdrawl from Siachen, before making a U-turn.