It has no incremental value.
The Abrahamics all behave like a gang, be it Irish gangs, or Vatican Catholics, or Jews, or Shias, or Arabs or ******s. There is no value in emulating it, it has no strategic or tactical purpose, it's just gang behavior like teenage kids making gang signs with their fingers. It's not an Asian thing. It hurts the branding of a civilizational state to be seen in conflict with small gangs.
China has so many terrorist groups acting against it, have you even seen them name any one individual of any terrorist group? can any of us name any Hafees Saeed from Xinjiang, Tibet, SCS? China is very clear about not giving any footage to individuals. They threaten the US directly, they don't allow US presidents, intel chiefs and army chiefs to have their
A 6k year old civilization cannot be seen as having mere mortals as enemies. Do you want the elected leader of 1.3 B people to be seen giving threats to chillar chap jahils living in the gullies in Peshawar? The intel agencies will take care of them. A civilizational state has civilizational enemies. I already don't like people labeling Dawood and LeT and Hafeez Saeed as 'India's enemy number one'. This is a country ruled by Cholas, and Guptas and Ashokas. They must be laughing at us from their graves at our predicament of having petty ganglords as national enemies. In their age, if there was a problem they used to invade foreign countries and annex them. What are we degraded ourselves to threatening chillar goons on twitter.
Let Mr 56 blame Pakistan. When you blame LeT, you are buying into their narrative of non-state actors. We know that all terrorist groups are state assets of Pakistan, so why blame the puppets. Kill the puppets, blame the puppeteer.