Indian Army: News and Discussion

12arya

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
4,208
Likes
15,080
Country flag
These jihadi media need to be taught a lesson!


Twitter Faces Backlash After 'Shadow-Banning' an Indian Army Account Over Rescue Operation Post


American social media giant Twitter has stirred up a controversy after “shadow-banning” an Indian Army account for reasons unclear so far. The account in question is that of the Kashmir-based Chinar Corps, which had tweeted a post about rescue operations in Jammu and Kashmir.

"So, now you have started to censor the Indian Army accounts", commented a Delhi-based activist group, which has also filed a complaint against Twitter with the federal government.
Filed complaint with @MIB_India @GoI_MeitY @HMOIndia against @TwitterIndia for illegal censorship of OfficialTwitter handle of @ChinarcorpsIA , a handle of @adgpi
sought stringent action against Twitter India head & twitter company as a whole for violating Indian constitution. pic.twitter.com/Z2SGXCZ6v2
— Kalinga Rights Forum (@KalingaForum) November 17, 2020
#Update #Strike2

Our complaint is forwarded to Ms Simmi Chaudhry, Economic Advisor, (@GoI_MeitY ) for stringent action against @TwitterIndia & its officials for censoring & shadow banning @ChinarcorpsIA , a handle of @adgpi pic.twitter.com/PyUaaQl2Zx
— Kalinga Rights Forum (@KalingaForum) November 17, 2020
The social media post, made by the Srinagar-headquartered Chinar Corps, recounted the efforts of Indian troops in rescuing a vehicle stuck in the snow in the Gulmarg region.
"Tough times and tough tasks get tough men in action."#IndianArmy helped in recovery of a tourist vehicle in Gulmarg.#Kashmir#HumsayaHaiHum @adgpi @NorthernComd_IA pic.twitter.com/0SRypXE5Ae
— Chinar Corps🍁 - Indian Army (@ChinarcorpsIA) November 16, 2020
As per Twitter, shadow-banning is “deliberately making someone's content undiscoverable” to some users. After the Chinar Corps' account was censored by Twitter, the name of the Indian Army account wouldn't show up in search results even after typing the full account details.

In the past, the California-headquartered company has been accused by US President Donald Trump of shadow-banning accounts of Republican leaders.
"Twitter SHADOW BANNING prominent Republicans. Not good. We will look into this discriminatory and illegal practice at once! Many complaints", the US president complained in July 2018.

Twitter's Troubles with Indian Authorities
The alleged shadow-banning of the Indian Army account was the latest in a series of incidents of late that have pitted Twitter against Indian social media users - and even the federal government in a few cases.
The South Asian country's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) on 9 November accused Twitter of "undermining the will" of India's sovereign parliament by depicting the newly-created Leh Union Territory as part of the Jammu and Kashmir region.

Twitter has reportedly assured Indian authorities that it would sort out the matter by the end of the month.
In October, the Indian government also sent a letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for depicting Leh as part of China.
"…such attempts not only bring disrepute to Twitter but also raises questions about its neutrality and fairness as an intermediary”, India's Information and Technology (IT) Secretary Ajay Sawhney stated in his communication to Twitter's boss.
 

12arya

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
4,208
Likes
15,080
Country flag

NEW DELHI: The security forces deployed in Jammu and Kashmir have recovered more pistols than AK-47s this year. Top officials involved in dealing with terrorists claimed that the terrorist organisations are facing a shortage of weapons which forced them to use pistols instead of assault rifles.


As a result there has been more recovery of pistols than AK-47s till October 15 this year. According to official data compiled by the forces, accessed by ANI, security forces have recovered 203 pistols and 152 AK-47 from terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir till October 15 this year.


Out of 190 total violent incidents, 100 have been registered due to cross-border firing. Data also shows that terrorists have also done 44 grenade attacks and 1 IED blast as well. Officials claimed that the recovery of pistols has been consistent in almost all encounters.


"Terrorists who hold senior posts in terror organizations are getting AK-47s but young and new recruits are mainly given pistols. Of late, we have noticed the use of pistols is frequent due to shortage of assault guns," a senior CRPF official told ANI.


An officer who is heading a unit which is responsible for anti-terror operations in J&K said that due to lack of training also, there is a rise in usage of pistols.


"Earlier, terrorists used to conduct training in areas deep inside but due to high penetration of security forces, they are unable to conduct training of assault and long-range rifles. There have been cases where terrorists were caught with pistols alive and when asked, he said that he doesn't know how to use a pistol. There is a shortage of weapons as well lack of training due to which terrorists are using pistols frequently," the official said.


Officials also claimed that more Chinese pistols have been recovered from the possession of terrorists eliminated by security forces-- Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Indian Army, Jammu and Kashmir police.Data also shows that terrorists who were eliminated by security forces were majorly aged between 21 and 25 years and some of them were also below 20 years.


Yesterday, Indian Army and Border Security Force seized two AKs rifles with two magazines and 60 rounds of bullets, one pistol with two magazines and 29 rounds of bullets, one radio set, Rs 50,000 Indian currency and administrative stores during a joint operation against terrorists in Machil sector of Kupwara district.


Similarly, in the last few weeks, two Pakistani terrorists were eliminated by security forces, while their local man surrendered during an encounter in Lalpora village of Pampore here. During the search, two AK-47 rifles and two pistols were recovered from the encounter site.
 

12arya

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
4,208
Likes
15,080
Country flag

On the occasion of 20 years of Russian arms export agency, Rosoboronexport, Defenseworld.net discussed its market outlook - especially in relation to India - with Konstantin Makienko, deputy director of the Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST), an independent Russian think tank.



DW : Please tell us about the Rosoboronexport's role today in the Russian system of military and technical cooperation with foreign countries, especially, in relation to India?
Konstantin Makienko: Rosoboronexport that was established 20 years ago pays great attention to the implementation of industrial projects, especially in relations with such large industrial countries as India. The very first large projects in the field of Soviet-Indian military-technical cooperation provided for a license to India and for the manufacture MiG-21FL fighter jets in the sixties. In the eighties, licensed production of MiG-27ML fighter-bombers was performed. And of course, one should mention the Su-30MKI heavy multipurpose fighter jet, which today has become the crucial element of the Indian Air Force's combat fleet. In the domain of the ground forces, the production of the T-72S and T-90S main battle tanks, as well as the BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles, was launched in India. Of the most recent examples, we can also note the contract for the construction of Project 11356 Talwar-class frigates in Goa (Shipyard).

DW : Have you created equipment from scratch especially developed to suit Indian requirements?
Konstantin Makienko: Indian partners often seek to acquire equipment, modified or entirely developed according to their own specifications. For example, the USSR created the An-32 military transport aircraft especially for India as optimized for operation in hot climates and at high-altitude airfields. The Project 61ME destroyers were designed according to specification of the Indian Navy. It is curious, that finally the Indian project turned out to be more effective than the Soviet ships of Project 61, on the basis of which the Indian version was developed. The Indian Navy received a multipurpose ship, while the Soviet version was an anti-submarine ship. It is worth noting that the 61ME Project destroyers are still in service with the Indian Navy, which clearly indicates the success of this design. If we talk about the post-Soviet period, then again it is necessary to return to the Su-30MKI project. When developing a technical appearance of this fighter jet, the Indian military set a very high technological standard, which was at the limit of the then capabilities of the Russian aero industry. Moreover, subsystems of third countries, mainly France and Israel, as well as Indian equipment, including the mission computer, were integrated into the onboard equipment suit. Thus, Rosboronexport has much experience in creating military products according to Indian requirements.

DW : Given that the S-400 Triumf ADMS contract has become the biggest military-technical cooperation project between Russia and India, what can be said about the current Russian market offer in the domain of air defense systems?
Konstantin Makienko: The USSR and Russia have always possessed a very capable industry for developing and producing the air defense systems. The peculiarity of the Russian market proposals is that Rosoboronexport can supply its partners with the entire range of air defense systems - from portable anti-aircraft missile systems to long-range anti-aircraft missile systems like S-400. It can be said that the Russian Federation offers to the global market virtually on a turnkey basis a complete set of solutions for air defense, including the recently proposed systems to combat small-sized UAVs, i.e. complete air defense network.

DW : What is the current state of the Russia-India military cooperation, given the Indian policy of arms procurement diversification?
Konstantin Makienko: Despite India's diversification of weapons sources and the development of its own defense industry, it is Russian weapons that dominate all branches of the Indian Armed Forces. This applies to the Air Force, the Navy, and the Ground Forces. Two major features of Russia as a partner of India can be highlighted. Firstly, Russia is ready to transfer practically any conventional weapons technology to India. At the same time, the license depth is not limited by anything - as in the Su-30MKI case – India is assembling AL-31FP turbofan engines. In general, there are only a handful of countries in the world capable of producing such complex systems as the AL-31FP engine. India is one of these states. Russian and Indian military-political interests are so compatible, so harmonious that Rosoboronexport has no deterrent motives for technology transfer. And secondly, Russia has transferred, and is ready to transfer in the future extremely powerful systems that no one else in the world trades in. For example, we are talking about an aircraft carrier. For India, Russia remains the only source of such technologies.

DW : What is your personal assessment of the Su-30MKI Modernization program?
Konstantin Makienko: The technical appearance of the fighter jet was formed over twenty years ago. Of course, the deep upgrade is needed. Ideally, a new radar with an active phased array and new weapons should be integrated. The specific technical appearance of modernized aircraft should be determined only by the Indian Air Force in accordance with its needs and financial capabilities. I can only say, that the Su-30 platform itself and the open architecture of the avionics provide the most significant and flexible capabilities, up to the integration of such heavy aircraft weapons as the BrahMos-A weighing 2.5 tons. No other multi-role fighter of the Indian Air Force can provide such an opportunity. The early modernization is also needed because the Su-30MKI remains, despite the Rafale purchase, the most utilized IAF's fighter jet, and constitutes its mainstay. It provides the IAF with a tactical, operational and even a operational-strategic tool.

DW : India wants to replace the MiG-29K carrier borne jets with Boeing F/A-18 or Rafale. Any thoughts on this?
Konstantin Makienko: The F/A-18 fighter jet is too heavy for the existing Vikramadytia aircraft carrier, and this is even more so for the lighter Vikrant career that is under construction. Rafale can theoretically be integrated on both of these ships, but the entire take-off and landing system, the entire system of aviation technical equipment was originally developed for the use of Russian aircraft. As far as I understand, this also applies to Vikrant. Rebuilding ships for the CATOBAR system will be so laborious and expensive that it is easier to lay down a new ship and build it from the very beginning to make suitable for catapult takeoff. In the meantime, for the next 10-15 years (at least), I do not see any alternative to the MiG-29K fighter jet. Here we return to the issue of joint projects. This is a great opportunity for the Indian Navy and the Russian Navy to jointly develop unified requirements for the modernization of this fighter jet and to jointly purchase a batch in the interests of the two countries, or at the same time modernize the existing fleet if the purchase of new carrier-based aircraft seems excessive. The project to build the aircraft carrier Vikramaditya for the Indian Navy is a prime example of the special relationship between Russia and India in the field of military-technical cooperation. By having received this ship and MiG-29K carrier aircraft for horizontal take-off, the Indian fleet significantly levelled up its capabilities. The ship rebuilding project itself is an engineering miracle. During the modernization works the radio-electronic equipment and the power plant were completely replaced, the type of aircraft weapons was changed.

DW : The media have reported about the Indian interest toward the Sprut-SDM1 light amphibious tank. What are the major advantages of this tank?
Konstantin Makienko: The most significant feature of Sprut-SDM1 is that while being a light tank it possesses the firepower of the main battle tank – the 125 mm gun, which can also fire guided missiles. Its major competitors on the global market, the light tanks from China (Type 15) and Turkey (Kaplan), are armed only with a 105 mm gun. Unlike them, Sprut-SDM1 has good amphibious capabilities and can even use its main armament while swimming. The new Russian tank also is a genuine light tank in terms of weight – the Chinese and Turkish tanks are heavier. The light weight gives Sprut-SDM1 a unique cross-country ability in the mountains and in swampy areas. We should also point out, that Russia currently proposes at the global market not only the armoured vehicles, but also the specially designed digital simulating systems, which ensure 100% real-life simulation of the vehicle's combat action without wasting ammunition, fuel etc. A product line of such systems was showcased at the ARMY-2020 expo this August by the Training Systems, the major developer in this field.
DW : What is left wanting in the Russia, India military-technical cooperation?
Konstantin Makienko: I think,that we should more actively develop joint projects in the interests of the armed forces of both states. Moreover, our countries have such a high level of compatibility and complementarity of military-political interests that it is possible and necessary to build the elements of a common military-industrial space.
DW : Are you happy with the progress in the KA-226T project? When can we expect a firm contract on this?
Konstantin Makienko: Ka-226T is absolutely indispensable for the Indian military given its capabilities in the mountains and the need to replace the ageing fleet of Chetak helicopters, constructively belonging to the early 1960-s helicopter era. The Ka-226T project is also a unique chance for India to master a number of crucial helicopter engineering technologies, including the unique coaxial rotors scheme. But despite the obvious interest of the military in Ka-226T, the implementation of the project (i.e. signing the contract) for its production in India has been in a standby mode for several years due to, probably, judging by previous experience, overestimated requirements for the level of localization. The planned level, reported by the Indian media this year, in fact is already very high for any aerospace product. Ka-226T is not a handgun, as all aerospace products it is a complex, high-tech system. 100% localization is just not possible to be achieved at once. The global practice of concluding and fulfilling contracts for the localization of such military equipment indicates a gradual increase in the level of localization based on the capabilities of the local industry. In case of Ka-226T one could be sure, that the proposed level of localization of the Russian components meets the requirements of Make in India program and does not require additional certification procedures from the outside (thus saving financial and time resources). I would also add an interesting historical link: Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant (UUAZ), which is going to manufacture the helicopters in Russia and participate in organizing the licensed production in India, earlier was the producer of MiG-27 combat aircraft, and in the 1980s played a major role in the transfer of technology for the license production of MiG-27 Bahadur jets by HAL in India. Another major program, that is also waiting to get started, is AK203 assault rifle joint production project. It envisages unique 100% localization level and options for exporting the rifles to the third countries. Thus potentially, aside from being a regional economic growth driver, it could seriously propel India's ambitions as an arms exporter. The project is based on the intergovernmental agreement concluded on the highest level. Although the manufacturing facility was officially opened more than 1.5 years ago, there is no production because there is no contract.

DW : The head of ROE has spoken about the Su-57 and Armata as potential international bestsellers, do you see a future for these equipment in India?
Konstantin Makienko: I am sure, that both products have future in India. Su-57 is an aircraft, combining the ground attack and interception capabilities, created with the use of the most up-to-date technologies, which can be offered by the Russian aerospace industry. Concealed operating due to the low radar signature, high level of EW capabilities, data fusing and networking with Command & Control (C2) systems, supersonic maneuverability, high intelligence in combat use, omnidirectional and multichannel use of weapons – all this is Su-57. Su-57 is unique compared to other 5th generation aircraft in terms of the size, weight and type of missiles & munitions fitted in its internal bays. The same can be said about T-14 Armata main battle tank. It is the first tank in the world with an uninhabited tower. It can be considered the most advanced tank in the world
 

12arya

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
4,208
Likes
15,080
Country flag

India might produce firearms in the country in near future as leading UAE based arms manufacturer Caracal hints opening base in India


A gun manufacturer based in UAE, Caracal, has won a bid to manufacture and supply 93,000 carbines to the Indian army.

According to a report by popular news agency The Tribune, the arms manufacturer informed of having a “make in India” plan. According to the report, the manufacturer is planning to have a manufacturing base in India, in the near future, for its entire range of small arms, which can be exported to other markets.


Hamad Salem Alameri, the CEO of Caracal has spoken to the news agency, The Tribune, over video conference. Caracal has its headquarters in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates. Caracal International LLC is the largest and the region’s leading original equipment manufacturer (OEM) small arms producer. The manufacturer deals in several weapons including the latest technology 9 mm striker-fired combat pistol, 9 mm submachine gun (SMG) in standard, compact, and suppressed versions, three AR15 derived tactical rifles, and three modular sniper rifles for use by civilians or professional law enforcement and military operators.


Caracal is an entity within its own rights. The company consists of wholly-owned subsidiaries in Germany and the USA. The arms manufacturer has a legacy of over 15 years for the production of firearms.


They deal in designing, engineering, manufacturing, and innovating battlefield proven firearms.


India makes 60 percent of the product the company selects, the CEO said, according to the report. The CEO also said that it is not just this close-quarter carbine for the Army. “We make an entire range of weapons like pistols,” the CEO said to The Tribune.


As the news agency, The Tribune asked them about their Indian partners, the CEO said, “We await the formal order and will share details of the local partner. We have already identified the required land and will be able to commence production to meet the timelines agreed upon with the Indian Defence Ministry.”


The company has to supply the carbines within 12 months from the signing of the contract.


Al Ameri also said, “Our focus remains on delivering a product which is best in quality and tailor-made as per the requirements of the Indian soldier.”


As they asked if his company would avail the 75 foreign direct investment route which India allows in defense manufacturing, Alameri said, “We will explore all potential possibilities while engaging with India. We are deeply invested in India. Not only we are prepared to supply quality weaponry that leverages cutting-edge technology, but also facilitates the transfer of technology and research and development facilities to India to build a more substantial ecosystem.”


In another interview, that the CEO of Caracal had with another popular news agency, The Hindu, the CEO said, “Once this first contract moves, lot of sister companies within the group will see this as a success story and people will have the confidence to come and invest in India.” He also believes that the most important message is that everyone is looking at and people are willing to come and invest in India and create jobs with the blessings of the two governments.


The arms manufacturer, Caracal, although was shortlisted two years back, recently the Indian Defence Ministry took the decision to cancel the order and go for the “make in India” route. However, no announcement has been made yet.


The CEO said, “Nothing came to us officially on the cancellation or on the intent of cancellation.”


The CEO informed during the interview that they have identified four locations to set up their facility and have also identified local partners so that they can be able to start production as soon as possible. The company CEO also informed that 20 percent of the components that are fitted in CAR 816 are already manufactured in India.


In January 2018, Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), through the Fast Track Procurement (FTP) route approved deals for 72,400 assault rifles and 93,895 carbines.
 

12arya

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
4,208
Likes
15,080
Country flag

Indian Army veterans in Darjeeling hills have blamed changes in recruitment criteria and socio-economic factors for the recent trend of vacant Indian Gorkha berths in the country’s seven Gorkha regiments.
A career in the armed forces had traditionally been a matter of pride for Indian Gorkhas.
India has seven Gorkha regiments with around 40,000 Gorkhas. For these regiments, 60 per cent vacancies are reserved for citizens of Nepal while the rest 40 per cent for Indian Gorkhas.
Lt. Colonel (retd) Keshab Rai, who recently flagged off this issue of vacancies to defence minister Rajnath Singh, pointed out the change in minimum qualification that the Indian Army was a major drawback for Indian Gorkhas.
“In 2001, while fellow Indians needed to be Class X pass with a minimum aggregate of 45 per cent, Gorkhas needed to be Class VIII pass,” said Lt. Col (retd) Rai. In 2019, the criteria for Gorkhas was that they had to be Class X (matric) pass with 45 per cent marks aggregate and 33 per cent in each subject.
Lt Col (retd) Rai feels that the “environment” from where the Gorkhas come must be emphasised. He, however, admitted that young Gorkhas, even from rural areas, are not as hardy as in the past.
The decline in Indian Gorkha recruits in the Indian Army has come as a matter of concern for defence analysts as the contribution of Gorkhas in the armed forces is unmatched. The association of Gorkhas with the army in India dates back to over 200 years.
The issue of few takers for army jobs among Indian Gorkhas came to the fore following media reports that the Indian Army is considering recruiting youths from Uttarkhand in Gorkha regiments.
The reports drew sharp criticism from politicians like Gaurav Gogoi, deputy leader of Congress in Lok Sabha, who felt that such a move “will be a departure from the guiding philosophy of the Gorkha Rifles.” Shanta Chhetri, TMC Rajya Sabha member, Darjeeling leaders like Anit Thapa and veterans like Rai have opposed the reported move.
Lt. Gen (retd) Gurung, a Gorkha to occupy one of the highest positions in the India army, listed many reasons for the declining interest of Indian Gorkhas in the army.
“This is because the physical fitness has gone down and they are also not being able to clear medical and written tests,” he said. “The first test is a one-mile race and one has to complete in 5.40 minutes. One has to run like a horse and even if you jog for 10 paces you are finished,” the veteran armyman said. “But physical fitness (among Gorkha youths) has gone down.”
During recruitment, Gorkhas get physical relaxation in terms of height and weight but other tests stay the same.
Another reason is greater awareness of other careers, Lt. Gen (retd) Gurung said. “Our children are now increasingly looking at engineering, IT, civil services and other sectors. Becoming a soldier is no longer a career option high on the list,” he said.
He made some suggestions to the Centre through The Telegraph:
  • Explore the possibility of reducing the 40 Gorkha Regiment battalions to around 37
  • Increase the percentage of recruitment from Nepal to 70 per cent from the existing 60 per cent
  • Decide to include youths from Uttarkhand in Gorkha Regiment as a trial as discrimination and victimisation against them by the majority Gorkhas in the regiment cannot be ruled out
  • Do away with the existing caste based recruitment in Gorkha Regiment for a more mixed representation.
But the numbers of Indian Gorkhas taking up army careers are dwindling.
Lt Gen (retd) Shakti Gurung, a former director general (recruiting) of the Indian Army, while speaking to The Telegraph over phone from Dehradun recounted an anecdote to substantiate this.
“I once got a complaint from Uttarakhand that Gorkhas are not being recruited adequately. I was requested for a special rally only for Gorkhas,” he said. He decided to provide 40 vacancies for Gorkhas, but only 600 to 700 youths turned up, he said, out of which only 15 got selected.
 
Last edited:

FalconSlayers

धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
27,502
Likes
189,936
Country flag
I never knew that we are using 6 Regiments of S-300VM since 2006🤯.
 

WolfPack86

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Messages
10,511
Likes
16,960
Country flag
Mired in red tape
As the border crisis with China continues, the defence ministry moves to revive four critically required weapons procurements. Multiple factors, however, prevent an early resolution.



Four big-ticket Indian Army procurements for carbines, mobile air defence gun-missile systems, light helicopters and shoulder-launched missiles worth over $5 billion (Rs 36,000 crore) have been caught in an impasse for several months now. But for the ongoing military standoff with China, delays in acquiring this urgently required hardware would not have spelt a crisis. This is because India’s process-driven defence acquisitions move at a snail’s pace, with each contract taking an average 7-8 years to be concluded.

These four cases are only part of the Rs 90,048 crore the ministry of defence (MoD) plans to spend on buying new hardware for the forces in the present financial year, minister of state (MoS) for defence Shripad Naik told the Lok Sabha on September 15.

Two cases are particularly urgent as they are meant to replace the army’s vintage in-service military hardware. The army’s 1970s model Cheetah helicopters used to resupply troops in high altitudes at Siachen and Ladakh and the dwindling stock of shoulder-fired missiles meant to provide low-cost air defence solutions, particularly in the frontlines, are nearing the end of their lifespans. The army needs new air defence gun-missile systems to replace the World War II-era L-70 guns. For three of these imports, light helicopters, air defence guns and carbines, we have indigenous alternatives which are fit cases for the government’s ‘Aatmanirbhar Bharat’ initiative. Yet, these deals, held up for reasons ranging from deviations in procedure, budgetary constraints, complaints from competitors and a recent renewed thrust for indigenisation, have become a sort of Gordian knot the ministry seems unable to slice through. Adding to the difficulties is the looming shadow of India’s largest arms supplier and strategic partner Russia. Russian state-owned firms are in the fray for three of the big-ticket items and Moscow is believed to have lobbied for stalling the deals at the political level. The UAE government, another country with significant diplomatic heft in New Delhi, owns the firm in the fray for carbines. The defence ministry has held a series of recent meetings to resolve the intractable delays in these cases, but without much success.

The eternal loop

On September 15, the defence ministry made its most determined effort to ‘un-jam’ three of these procurements. A meeting attended by chief of defence staff Gen. Bipin Rawat, in his capacity as secretary, department of military affairs, vice-chief of army staff (VCOAS) Lt Gen. S.K. Saini and top MoD officials took some swift decisions. It decided to scrap the imports of over 93,000 carbines from UAE’s Caracal International LLC (the shortlisted firm) and the self-propelled air-defence gun missile systems (SPADGMS) for which South Korea’s Hanhwa Defense had emerged lowest bidder. The carbine deal was scrapped because only one company qualified, an undesirable ‘single vendor situation’; the air defence system because of complaints from the Russian competitor alleging deviations in trials.

Over a month later, however, both deals continue to be in limbo and are yet to be scrapped because the army is keen on going ahead with the procurements. Caracal, a subsidiary of the UAE government-owned EDGE group, has now offered local production (earlier all the weapons were to be imported from the UAE under a fast-track procedure). A key defence ministry official has recommended a smaller, off-the-shelf buy of around 25,000 carbines. The army has been advised to extend the life of its 2019 ‘acceptance of necessity’ given for an order of 350,000 carbines to ‘buy and make’ the weapons in India. The MoD-owned Ordnance Factory Board and private companies like Adani Defence and SSS Defence are in the fray.

It is in the case of the gun-missile system that the delays could be protracted. The army had in 2013 floated a requirement for five regiments of a self-propelled air defence gun-missile system. The 104 units were budgeted at approximately $2.5 billion, with each unit having twin 30 mm cannons and four short-range missiles fitted on a tracked chassis. These self-propelled gun-missile systems are meant to protect vital areas and installations from threats like low-flying aircraft, helicopters and drones. South Korea’s K30, made by Hanwha Defense, emerged as the lowest bidder beating out two Russian contenders. Cost negotiations did not proceed after the Russian side objected to their exclusion from the deal. The defence ministry recommended that the deal be scrapped on the grounds that the army’s specifications for the contract, dating back to 2011, were nearly a decade old. Hanwha has now offered maximum indigenisation in manufacturing, assembly and integration at existing facilities of Larsen & Toubro or other Indian defence companies, government sources said.

The MoD is also trying to revive a stalled joint Indo-Russian deal to jointly manufacture 200 Ka-226T helicopters. The deal was part of an inter-governmental agreement (IGA) signed in Moscow in 2015 during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s summit visit with Russian president Vladimir Putin.

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), Russian Helicopters and Russia’s state arms exporting firm Rosoboronexport formed a joint venture, Indo-Russian Helicopters Ltd (IRHL), in 2017 with a holding of 50.5 per cent, 42 per cent and 7.5 per cent, respectively, but the deal has not progressed because the MoD has flagged a serious divergence in procedure. The deal has been found to be non-compliant with the original requirement of the request for proposal (RFP)—that the indigenous component must be 70 per cent. The helicopters currently have 70 per cent Russian components and 26 per cent French (the engines). IRHL has said it can achieve 70 per cent indigenous components only in the fourth and final batch of helicopters. Delays in this deal have been a recent bugbear in defence ties between India and Russia and the MoD has suggested that the case be fast-tracked. Government officials say that the army, HAL, IRHL and the MoD have concluded that Russia needs to increase the indigenous content in the helicopters and also transfer critical technologies.

The MoD has two alternatives: altering the RFP requirements, or scrapping the deal altogether. The former would need fresh approvals from the defence acquisition committee (DAC) headed by defence minister Rajnath Singh; scrapping the deal could be difficult since it was part of the 2015 Modi-Putin IGA. But it wouldn’t be the first time India has walked out of similar JVs. In July 2018, then defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced the government was backing out of the Indo-Russian Fifth General Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) project. The reasons had to do with an increase in costs and the IAF and HAL’s unhappiness with the technology being shared.

If the MoD does walk down a similar path with the Ka-226T, it has the homegrown Light Utility Helicopter (LUH) to fall back on. The LUH, designed and built by HAL in a short span of five years, demonstrated its ability to operate in high altitudes in September this year. During 10-day trials, the machine flew from Leh and did a ‘hot and high’ hover performance at the Daulat Beg Oldie advanced landing ground which, at over 16,000 feet, is the world’s highest. HAL officials say the helicopter also demonstrated its payload capability at the Siachen glacier. HAL CMD R. Madhavan says the army version of the LUH is now ready for initial operational clearance (IOC). Government sources, however, say that the LUH’s slow rate of induction will not be able to meet the army’s needs. “Meeting our requirements in an acceptable time-frame dictates dual route induction of Ka-226 T and the LUH...it was a conscious decision taken back in 2015,” says a government official.

The Russian missile

In February this year, Gorgen Johansson, president of Saab Dynamics AB, wrote a letter to Rajnath Singh. The chief of Sweden’s largest defence firm made serious charges against Russia’s Rosoboronexport which had emerged lowest bidder in the Indian army’s decade-old search for a new shoulder-fired air defence missile. Johansson said that the Russian firm ‘had repeatedly been given undue advantages outside the perimeter of the defence procurement procedure’ and hence should have been disqualified. The Russian military was replacing the Igla-S with a newer missile, the Verba, Johansson said, and hence India would not get the benefit of state-of-the-art technology. The letter, which is the second one in two years from the Swedish firm, has put a spoke in the procurement of what the army calls an urgent operational requirement.

The army’s search began way back in 2009 with an AON (acceptance of necessity) to buy 5,175 VSHORAD (Very Short Range Air Defence) man portable systems. The missiles were categorised a ‘Buy and Make’ deal in which the lowest bidding foreign vendor would supply an initial lot of missiles and equipment and transfer technology to an Indian public sector undertaking to manufacture the remaining missiles locally with full transfer of critical technology like the booster and seeker. The deal has been mired in controversy ever since the five-year-long field trials of three missile systems, French, Swedish and Russian, concluded in 2017. Saab’s first letter alleging deviations in trials favouring the Russian side was sent in 2018. An MoD-appointed committee that year did not see any deviations in procedure and gave the deal the go-ahead. Fresh complications have arisen with the Russian side refusing to transfer booster and seeker technology. The 2020 letter from the Swedish firm, however, has stalled the deal as the ministry looks for ways to overcome this. One option is to buy a limited number of missiles off the shelf under the fast-track procedure and explore indigenous options later. But unlike the HAL-built light helicopter which can be brought to service within five years, there is no swift indigenous solution here. The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has made promises of delivering a man-portable missile in three years but it needs to convince the army that it can do so within the time-frame. The army is procuring a certain quantity of lgla-S missiles through the Rs 500 crore emergency powers route delegated to the VCOAS.

Needed, a holistic reassessment

Many of these deals have been in the pipeline for close to a decade and from a time when it was assumed defence budgets would increase to keep pace with the growing requirements of the forces. Meanwhile, the standoff in Leh has refocused the army’s efforts towards a whole new set of hardware requirements, from drones capable of operating at high altitudes to weapons that can shoot down enemy drones to sensors that can look deep across the LAC in all-weather conditions. It remains to be seen if the army’s already constrained budgets will permit these newer acquisitions as well as replace its legacy systems in a unit-for-unit case. “We require a de novo joint service capability review to remove irrelevant procurements, duplication or multiple inventories,” says Lt Gen. A.B. Shivane, the army’s former DG, Mechanised Forces. Such a capability review would notice, for instance, the multiple inventories created if the MoD went ahead and bought both the Ka-226T and the indigenous LUH, creating two separate production lines for a machine essentially meeting the same requirement. As always, there are no easy solutions without a deep reform of the procurement system.
 

Pugilist

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
195
Likes
1,537
Country flag


A forum member based in India should file a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court seeking a declaration the GOI ban or limit Twitter in India, inter alia, because it is stifling freedom of expression in India contrary to the rights in the Indian constitution AND its decisions in this regard are capricious and opaque.

I’m happy to assist in drafting any claim and other material in this regard.

I will also pay all filing fees.

Any takers?
 

Spindrift

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
2,661
Likes
8,658


A forum member based in India should file a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court seeking a declaration the GOI ban or limit Twitter in India, inter alia, because it is stifling freedom of expression in India contrary to the rights in the Indian constitution AND its decisions in this regard are capricious and opaque.

I’m happy to assist in drafting any claim and other material in this regard.

I will also pay all filing fees.

Any takers?
Filing fees is not that much, the real cost is lawyers fees, if you want to win then you need to get a senior lawyer and the whole affair would cost at a minimum Rs 1Cr to 2Crs.
 

Pugilist

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
195
Likes
1,537
Country flag
Filing fees is not that much, the real cost is lawyers fees, if you want to win then you need to get a senior lawyer and the whole affair would cost at a minimum Rs 1Cr to 2Crs.
Where did you pluck the 1-2Cr figure from? Outrageous.

Cost a fraction of that to run a litigation in the superior courts in UK and Australia.
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,174


A forum member based in India should file a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court seeking a declaration the GOI ban or limit Twitter in India, inter alia, because it is stifling freedom of expression in India contrary to the rights in the Indian constitution AND its decisions in this regard are capricious and opaque.

I’m happy to assist in drafting any claim and other material in this regard.

I will also pay all filing fees.

Any takers?
Army should gets its priorities straight and bitch slap the SC or else ask for a Military court, SC has become a pass time club in its current state, Army should have enough rights to bitch slap the Twitter. How come they are fucking around with Official accounts.
At this rate colonialism will come back in the form of Big Tech.
 

shade

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Messages
14,376
Likes
87,262
Country flag
Army should gets its priorities straight and bitch slap the SC or else ask for a Military court, SC has become a pass time club in its current state, Army should have enough rights to bitch slap the Twitter. How come they are fucking around with Official accounts.
At this rate colonialism will come back in the form of Big Tech.
In ye olde times it came with the figleaf of "Civilizing mission", "White Man's Burden" and all.
Today it will be "Anti-Fascism", "Fighting Hate speech", "protecting Liberal democracy", "stopping Islamophobia" etc.
 

WolfPack86

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Messages
10,511
Likes
16,960
Country flag
Army Gives Specialised Tank Ammunition Development Project To Private Sector
OshoCorp Global’s project cost is over ₹2300 crore, with potential for future domestic and export orders

NEW DELHI: In a first, the Army has accorded project sanction order to OshoCorp Global for development and supply of specialised ammunition for its T-72 and T-90 main battle tanks.

The 125mm APFSDS (Armour Piercing Fin Stabilised Discarding-Sabot) ammunition is the primary tank ammunition, utilised for destruction of enemy tanks, according to Ashutosh Khate, CEO of OshoCorp Global. “Initially, there is need to develop upto 250 rounds each for T-72, T-90 tank platforms for trial and approval and subsequently produce 85,000 rounds of ammunition,” he said.

The project is being executed as per Make-II guidelines of defence procurement and the selection process has been conducted over 3 years. With availability of superior technologies to protect tanks and armoured vehicles, the Depth of Penetration (DoP) is a critical parameter to defect them.

Mr. Khate said they would develop and manufacture an improved APFSDS ammunition with minimum DoP of 530mm and higher, in order to enhance the lethality, within the existing ‘safety’, ‘consistency’, and ‘shelf life’ criteria. “This ammunition will be fired from the existing barrels, presently fitted on the T-72, T-90 tanks,” he added.

Col. PK Juneja (Retd), Head special projects at OshoCorp, said the project cost was over ₹2300 crore, with potential for future domestic and export orders. “In the export market, the countries using T-72and T-90 tanks can be benefited by purchasing India-developed 125mm APFSDS ammunition,” he noted.

Supply of APUs

OshoCorp was also recently selected by the Army for development and supply of Auxiliary Power Units (APU) for the T-72 and T-90 tanks. Mr. Khate said they were initially required to develop four APUs, two each for T-90 and T-72 Tanks, for trial and approval and subsequently produce 3,257 APU’s with a project cost of over ₹1325 crore.

The APU is an alternate source of power for the fire control system of the tank and ancillaries while deployed in surveillance mode or during training. It will conserve the life of tank’s main engine.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top