- Joined
- Aug 14, 2015
- Messages
- 1,419
- Likes
- 2,819
Self Propelled Howitzers (hereafter referred to as SPH) are meant to provide artillery support to an armoured spearhead in the force structure. An Armoured Spearhead consists of tanks, other armoured vehicles like Infantry Fighting Vehicles, Amoured Air Defence and SPH supported by Engineers and Signals, Close Air Support and recon aircraft. All these move as one force. It is a maneuver force meant to exploit a weak space in an enemy defensive line, and then break into the enemy rear area and either cut off the enemy frontline or capture a relatively less-defended objective with swift action. Why we specifically use SPH instead of Truck Mounted Howitzers or Towed Howitzers in these cases is explained below:-K9 Vajra includes cost to build factory of production, ToT charges etc.
Also,the way I see it, howitzers are used from a distance of 25-40km and the armor is unnecessary. Howitzer don't fire in direct line of sight and can't be targeted by enemy directly either. I don't see the need for armour. Howitzer is not a tank and in case howitzers are within 5km of a tank, there is no way howitzers can win. Howitzers are not meant to aim accurate direct shots. Someone has to use anti tank missile to destroy the tank before it kills the howitzers.
In fact, towed howitzers are far better than SPG due to ease in towing, ability to be strapped to a truck for faster long distance mobility or donkeys to be pulled over a mountain. Artillery is mostly used in mountainous terrain for concealment and that makes SPG a liability. The APU in the howitzer itself is considered to be more than sufficient for cases of urgent mobility needs. Artillery regiment is stationed for weeks and months and fuel problems becomes a much bigger problem.
SPG is simply put - difficult to move, requires high logistics, difficult to reload, difficult to operate and can't enter mountainous areas.
I don't see much needs for SPG but I do agree that it is better to have some than not. But I definitely don't see any need to have armoured chassis for it.
- Better Mobility: Towed Howitzers are not mobile enough. They have higher emplacement and displacement times. Truck Mounted Howitzers and SPH have superior mobility. This allows them to keep up with an armoured formation, particularly when they are dashing past enemy frontline to hit the enemy rear or seize an objective swiftly. SPH does not need much time to go into firing position, and can be fired from a completely unprepared position. SPH can also traverse some of the terrain that might be difficult for a Towed unit to cross (I might be wrong about this last sentence).
- Better Protection: Counter Battery fire would destroy any towed field artillery unit that is not provided with a dug-out emplacement. OTOH, Mounted gun units rely on their mobility and shoot-n-scoot tactics to increase their battlefield survivability. SPH however are meant to closely follow the armoured spearhead when it moves past enemy defensive line and into the rear areas of enemy tactical space. The armoured spearhead thrusts along one major axis of advance. The enemy ascertains all likely axis of advance based on location of breach of their front and location of strategic objectives. This means that the enemy has a fair idea of the possible axis of advance and therefore has a rough location of the armoured formation.Hence, enemy can employ artillery more effectively against our armoured formation than it can against the towed howitzers in their emplacements. The towed howitzers are constantly changing their position in the sheltered safety of our defensive front, which makes locating them a lot more difficult for the enemy. An SPH is used since its armour can provide sufficient protection against an artillery barrage (against splinters; direct hits go through, but are rare), even in the absence of appreciable cover. This surviavbility is essential for an artillery unit attached to a Strike formation.
- APU on towed howitzers is ONLY to make emplacement and displacement more efficient. Lighter guns (like Indian Field Gun and M777) use manual effort of gun crew to move it into ready-position. But heavier guns (like Dhanush or ATAGS) need considerably more effort for the same. Since weight penalty is negligible in these guns, an APU is provided. However in all cases, towed howitzers move into new firing locations by being hauled by Field Artillery Tractors. That is why they are called towed howitzers.
- SPH are not usually employed in direct fire modes. However, that does not mean they cannot be employed in such roles. Such innovative use of machines is the hallmark of all professional armies. This kind of field innovation is what gave us the concept of Armour Piercing rounds. If a howitzer is used like a WW-II era tank hunter, i.e. to ambush the enemy tank, then the SPH will win even if the enemy tank is within 5 km of range.
- Not all towed artillery can be pulled up a mountain intact. And good luck pulling ATAGS up a mountain using mules. It will look like a comic version of a chariot.
- I do agree that SPH will not be the preferred self-propelled artillery in the mountains. Maybe that is why the IA is considering 814 mounted guns.
- Not sure if they are required for Cold Start doctrine, however, for the Sunderji doctrine SPH in large numbers are indispensable. Since you have a high affinity for total war and think that limited war is "retarded", I figure you would be a fan of the Sunderji doctrine. Hence, you should be appreciative of the need of SPH in Indian Army.