- Joined
- Apr 10, 2017
- Messages
- 307
- Likes
- 508
30 characters,.................... .........
Last edited:
We have large reserves to take care of ratio, enough locals are already on our side there.It's not about just people. It's the operational constraints. Combat ratio between India and Pak is 1.5 :1. Considering the mountainous terrain, we would need a ratio of a minimum 6:1 to capture vital areas/vital grounds. In addition we need a third of the entire force for holding on to the positions captured. For logistics support along the long and tennous lines of communications additional forces will be needed for security.
In short, we don't have the numerical superiority to conduct an operation to capture GB and hold on to it indefinitely.
35000 Spike ATGM?I think we were getting too excited... I think Army is going to buy 35000 spike atgm... Last year it had plans for 5000
www.indiatoday.in/amp/mail-today/story/mega-boost-to-india-s-firepower-likely-as-army-looks-to-seal-israel-missile-deal-1221279-2018-04-27
@Sanglamorre.. tussi great ho...330300303003030030030300303
it's 70+% non-Sunni!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Any DETAILED demographic data?
Well, what do I know! Baba did mean to leave a code in NAHI!!!Maybe you're reading into it too much....fertile for conspiracy theories!
It could just be that he cannot emphasize/'capitalize' using Hindi script!
I think the mountainous terrain will also work against Pakis who will try to retake it.....as access to GB is via only couple of feeder roads........IA can cut it off. Then India will have an edge.It's not about just people. It's the operational constraints. Combat ratio between India and Pak is 1.5 :1. Considering the mountainous terrain, we would need a ratio of a minimum 6:1 to capture vital areas/vital grounds. In addition we need a third of the entire force for holding on to the positions captured. For logistics support along the long and tennous lines of communications additional forces will be needed for security.
In short, we don't have the numerical superiority to conduct an operation to capture GB and hold on to it indefinitely.
Gilgit is geographically (via trade routes) connected to Pakistan... it never had a lot of connections with our part of J and K... Also those guys hated the Raja... and are ethnically different from people on our side of J and K..it's 70+% non-Sunni!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Depends upon cost of extraction and future of fossil fuels in India.Sindh has one of the highest concentrations of coal and shale gas in the world (over 25 Million metric tons of coal deposits).
Way through Iran is way more costly than that through Gilgit. We did it because we didn't want our trade route to pass through Afghanistan.We can get to central Asia through Iran. Once you get to Iran, you get to central Asia, West Asia, Egypt, Russia, and Europe.
Rail line through high Himalaya range is not viable.
Road traffic is inefficient.
Right now industry in North India has a big problem of distance from ports. Actually exports can be done efficiently using trains through Rajasthan, Sindh, Baluchistan, Iran and further to central Asia, West Asia, Russia etc.
Kashmir was nothing negative for India before 80s.Kashmir will always be net negative for India. Kashmir is only a buffer, a no man's land so to speak. It has little economic value.
Not PKR's fall today. It's global strengthening of dollar.
paki currency touches 142.36
Boys played well!!!
paki pig minister said 2 weeks back that..pak currency will stabilize in a week. Gayfoora trollonomic will be called to support the falling PKR