India Strikes Against Pakistani Terrorism 2019

[pankaj nema]

Rawalpindi - April 01, 2019
No PR-64/2019-ISPR

Reference repeated Indian claims about shooting down of Pakistani F-16 by India and use of F16 in air battle on 27 February. The event of 27 Feb is part of history now. No Pakistani F16 was hit by Indian airforce. As regard PAF action for strikes across LOC it was done by JF17 from within Pakistan airspace. Later when 2 Indian jets crossed LOC they were shot down by PAF. Whether it was F16 or JF17 which shot down 2 Indian aircrafts is immaterial. Even if F-16 have been used as at that point in time complete PAF was airborne including F16s, the fact remains that Pakistan Airforce shot down two Indian jets in self defence. India can assume any type of their choice even F-16. Pakistan retains the right to use anything and everything in its legitimate self defence.

https://www.ispr.gov.pk/press-release-detail.php?id=5237

By lying again and again Pakis are only following Their Religious Principles of TAQIYYA

That is lying and deception for a Political objective

 

[Absolut_Vodka]

Rawalpindi - April 01, 2019
No PR-64/2019-ISPR

Reference repeated Indian claims about shooting down of Pakistani F-16 by India and use of F16 in air battle on 27 February. The event of 27 Feb is part of history now. No Pakistani F16 was hit by Indian airforce. As regard PAF action for strikes across LOC it was done by JF17 from within Pakistan airspace. Later when 2 Indian jets crossed LOC they were shot down by PAF. Whether it was F16 or JF17 which shot down 2 Indian aircrafts is immaterial. Even if F-16 have been used as at that point in time complete PAF was airborne including F16s, the fact remains that Pakistan Airforce shot down two Indian jets in self defence. India can assume any type of their choice even F-16. Pakistan retains the right to use anything and everything in its legitimate self defence.

https://www.ispr.gov.pk/press-release-detail.php?id=5237

Looks like typical post by Moderator on PDF before he locks the thread.

 

[Aghore_King]

Rawalpindi - April 01, 2019
No PR-64/2019-ISPR

Reference repeated Indian claims about shooting down of Pakistani F-16 by India and use of F16 in air battle on 27 February. The event of 27 Feb is part of history now. No Pakistani F16 was hit by Indian airforce. As regard PAF action for strikes across LOC it was done by JF17 from within Pakistan airspace. Later when 2 Indian jets crossed LOC they were shot down by PAF. Whether it was F16 or JF17 which shot down 2 Indian aircrafts is immaterial. Even if F-16 have been used as at that point in time complete PAF was airborne including F16s, the fact remains that Pakistan Airforce shot down two Indian jets in self defence. India can assume any type of their choice even F-16. Pakistan retains the right to use anything and everything in its legitimate self defence.

https://www.ispr.gov.pk/press-release-detail.php?id=5237

This pretty much confirms that Pakis didn't even crossed LOC...

 

[Darth Malgus]

https://www.dawn.com/news/1473232/f...involved-in-coordinated-inauthentic-behaviour

BTW folks, check the comments section...

 

[Darth Malgus]

Rawalpindi - April 01, 2019
No PR-64/2019-ISPR

Reference repeated Indian claims about shooting down of Pakistani F-16 by India and use of F16 in air battle on 27 February. The event of 27 Feb is part of history now. No Pakistani F16 was hit by Indian airforce. As regard PAF action for strikes across LOC it was done by JF17 from within Pakistan airspace. Later when 2 Indian jets crossed LOC they were shot down by PAF. Whether it was F16 or JF17 which shot down 2 Indian aircrafts is immaterial. Even if F-16 have been used as at that point in time complete PAF was airborne including F16s, the fact remains that Pakistan Airforce shot down two Indian jets in self defence. India can assume any type of their choice even F-16. Pakistan retains the right to use anything and everything in its legitimate self defence.

https://www.ispr.gov.pk/press-release-detail.php?id=5237

Right,


From - We did not use F-16s
To - Use of F-16s is immaterial

 

[lcafanboy]

https://m.hindustantimes.com/india-...ergo-repair/story-oBr1gGXTZODCVtdHsDBAPI.html

Only 1 of its 5 submarines operational, Pakistan sends SOS to China
Indian Navy officials say the maritime force was very clear about deployment of Pakistani naval assets after the Balakot strikes.

• Share on reddit
• Share on Google plus
• Share on Email

Cancel

Agosta 90B, Pakistan navy’s first indigenous submarine. Officials say 4 of navy’s 5 operational units are undergoing major refit. (Getty Images)
Updated: Apr 01, 2019 16:56 IST

By Shishir Gupta and Rahul Singh, Hindustan Times, New Delhi

Pakistan’s current submarine force levels are low with four of its navy’s five operational units undergoing major refit and repairs, three top intelligence officials in India have independently confirmed.

“We have inputs that indicate that only one Pakistan Navy submarine is partially operational. And this is the reason why they were frantically seeking help of the Chinese Navy to secure their maritime interests post-Pulwama,” said one of the three personnel cited above, a senior intelligence official. None of the three wished to be identified.

On February 14, a suicide bomber of the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed attacked an Indian paramilitary force convoy in Jammu and Kashmir, killing 40. India responded by bombing a Jaish terror facility in Pakistan on February 26.

After that air strike, a Pakistan Navy submarine was detected in the international waters off India’s west coast on February 27, the day when an intrusion by a Pakistan Air Force (PAF) fighter was effectively repelled in the Nowshera sector.

Indian Navy officials say the maritime force was very clear about deployment of Pakistani naval assets after the Balakot strikes.

“Maritime domain awareness was very high. We are still deployed and in full control of the situation,” a senior navy official said on condition of anonymity.

According to the intelligence officials, the lone submarine on patrol in high seas off the coast of India was part of the deception mission adopted by the Pakistan Navy. The submarine, which was identified by its radar signature, moved back to its base shortly, with the Pakistan Navy de-escalating its forward posture.

Indian Navy officials declined to comment on the state of Pakistan’s submarines. According to Vice Admiral (Retd) Madanjit Singh, former Commander-in-Chief, Western Navy, a partially operational submarine means that there are restrictions over diving to a certain level.

Pakistan has five French-made submarines, of which three belong to Augusta 90B class or Khalid class and two, with a nearly 40-year vintage, belong to the Augusta 70 or Hashmat class. While PNS Khalid is nearly 20 years old, PNS Saad is 18 years old and PNS Hamza was commissioned 11 years ago. HT learns that all three are under major repairs being done by a Turkish company and are expected to join active service only in 2020. The Khalid-class subs can fire cruise missiles.

While the Indian Navy remain tight-lipped, intelligence reports indicate that only PNS Hurmat, commissioned in 1980, is partially operational, with lead class boat PNS Hashmat, commissioned in 1979, undergoing a major overhaul. Submarines are a huge deterrent in times of hostility as they are used to prevent forward deployment of surface naval assets of the adversary and also to wreak economic damage by hampering harbour operations of the enemy.

 

[maomao]

This statement confirms that 2 aircraft fell inside pakistan and their own F16 was one of them. Hence, no wreckage was shown. What a self-goal by ISPR - yet again!

 

[aarav]

Before -"Janab F16 istemal nahi hua "
Now -" Miyan hamari marzi ham kuch bhi istemal kre"
Typical Al bakistani self goal

 

[VehlaBanda]

Before -"Janab F16 istemal nahi hua "
Now -" Miyan hamari marzi ham kuch bhi istemal kre"
Typical Al bakistani self goal

Future...Hmara tyaara gira hai inteha pasand india q khush ho raha hai....

Sent from my Mi A1 using Tapatalk

 

[shankyz]

Before -"Janab F16 istemal nahi hua "
Now -" Miyan hamari marzi ham kuch bhi istemal kre"
Typical Al bakistani self goal

Also now- Humne self defence mein F-16 use kiya tha

Future- Hamare F-16 ki g@@nd mar li gayi thi, anjaan shaheed pilot ko salaam

#PKMKB

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

 

[aghamarshana]

After losing their territory along the LOC in #Poonch and #Rajouri
Is Pakistan is planing to open new front?
Khusiyani Billi Khamba Noche

#OperationColdWave

 

[BigB.India]

Here again.....,..........................

 

[Nicky G]

What exactly is a large sized UAV package?

I guess, they thought that their F-16s would give their UAVs cover to sneak in, but their jets got painted and ran off.

https://m.hindustantimes.com/india-...ergo-repair/story-oBr1gGXTZODCVtdHsDBAPI.html

Only 1 of its 5 submarines operational, Pakistan sends SOS to China
Indian Navy officials say the maritime force was very clear about deployment of Pakistani naval assets after the Balakot strikes.

• Share on reddit
• Share on Google plus
• Share on Email

Cancel

Agosta 90B, Pakistan navy’s first indigenous submarine. Officials say 4 of navy’s 5 operational units are undergoing major refit. (Getty Images)
Updated: Apr 01, 2019 16:56 IST

By Shishir Gupta and Rahul Singh, Hindustan Times, New Delhi

Pakistan’s current submarine force levels are low with four of its navy’s five operational units undergoing major refit and repairs, three top intelligence officials in India have independently confirmed.

“We have inputs that indicate that only one Pakistan Navy submarine is partially operational. And this is the reason why they were frantically seeking help of the Chinese Navy to secure their maritime interests post-Pulwama,” said one of the three personnel cited above, a senior intelligence official. None of the three wished to be identified.

On February 14, a suicide bomber of the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed attacked an Indian paramilitary force convoy in Jammu and Kashmir, killing 40. India responded by bombing a Jaish terror facility in Pakistan on February 26.

After that air strike, a Pakistan Navy submarine was detected in the international waters off India’s west coast on February 27, the day when an intrusion by a Pakistan Air Force (PAF) fighter was effectively repelled in the Nowshera sector.

Indian Navy officials say the maritime force was very clear about deployment of Pakistani naval assets after the Balakot strikes.

“Maritime domain awareness was very high. We are still deployed and in full control of the situation,” a senior navy official said on condition of anonymity.

According to the intelligence officials, the lone submarine on patrol in high seas off the coast of India was part of the deception mission adopted by the Pakistan Navy. The submarine, which was identified by its radar signature, moved back to its base shortly, with the Pakistan Navy de-escalating its forward posture.

Indian Navy officials declined to comment on the state of Pakistan’s submarines. According to Vice Admiral (Retd) Madanjit Singh, former Commander-in-Chief, Western Navy, a partially operational submarine means that there are restrictions over diving to a certain level.

Pakistan has five French-made submarines, of which three belong to Augusta 90B class or Khalid class and two, with a nearly 40-year vintage, belong to the Augusta 70 or Hashmat class. While PNS Khalid is nearly 20 years old, PNS Saad is 18 years old and PNS Hamza was commissioned 11 years ago. HT learns that all three are under major repairs being done by a Turkish company and are expected to join active service only in 2020. The Khalid-class subs can fire cruise missiles.

While the Indian Navy remain tight-lipped, intelligence reports indicate that only PNS Hurmat, commissioned in 1980, is partially operational, with lead class boat PNS Hashmat, commissioned in 1979, undergoing a major overhaul. Submarines are a huge deterrent in times of hostility as they are used to prevent forward deployment of surface naval assets of the adversary and also to wreak economic damage by hampering harbour operations of the enemy.

Even the one operational is partially so. What a pathetic Navy. Heck, it doesn't deserve to be called a Navy.

 

[indus]

In my opinion the game to capture territory was set long ago. And most of us are missing the larger picture. What we are seeing today is just the after effects. Coz IA cannot simply decide one day to change the LoC. Remember the time Jaitley was DM when he said in an interview that IA was dominating the LoC. And sometime back NS said alot is being done but is not reported in media. These statements shld be looked at in this context. So lets say IA decides to capture point A. Capturing A and staying on it wont be possible untill we neutralise the flanks from where A can be targeted by PA. As the point A does not lie in isolation. So IA would first repeatedly bomb the supporting points which help PA in keeping A under its control, then only move in to capture the point A. Last year and till recently also, we heard IA targetting ammo dumps etc which make holding those post unbearable for PA to the point they decide to abandon it completely. The incident of PA raising upturned flags are a sign of this situation. Then only IA would advance in and capture point A. Now PA would try to neutralise the gains made by IA and hence make more CFV in those sectors. So an approximation of the gains made would be where the maxx CFV were reported. As far as i can remember maxx CFV were reported in Krishnaghati, poonch and Sunderbani sectors. Since I am weak in LoC geography, can someone enlighten the specific areas which IA would be interested in taking up and which are opposite to the aforementioned locations. It could give us a close approximation of the ground situation till IA comes full public.

 

[White Wolf]

Rawalpindi - April 01, 2019
No PR-64/2019-ISPR

Reference repeated Indian claims about shooting down of Pakistani F-16 by India and use of F16 in air battle on 27 February. The event of 27 Feb is part of history now. No Pakistani F16 was hit by Indian airforce. As regard PAF action for strikes across LOC it was done by JF17 from within Pakistan airspace. Later when 2 Indian jets crossed LOC they were shot down by PAF. Whether it was F16 or JF17 which shot down 2 Indian aircrafts is immaterial. Even if F-16 have been used as at that point in time complete PAF was airborne including F16s, the fact remains that Pakistan Airforce shot down two Indian jets in self defence. India can assume any type of their choice even F-16. Pakistan retains the right to use anything and everything in its legitimate self defence.

https://www.ispr.gov.pk/press-release-detail.php?id=5237

Lol!! According to him two jets crossed LOC, and after crossing LOC they were shot down in Pakistani territory. If they were shot down deep inside Pakistani territory then how come one jet fell on the other side of LOC??
This Ghaffor is the biggest chutiya I have seen so far. "Matlab kuchh bhi bakk Dena hai BC"

 

[trisonics]

Folks, the Indian strike was calculated, well directed, attack mostly on the psyche of the PAK military. They were caught with their pants down. They have spooked themselves now that India can attack at any time and place at will. Their pseudo mardangi and false bravado got heavily deflated on the 27th when they realized their counter attack was not well thought off and had no punch to deter India further anymore. As always they relied on their fake mardangi than use their brains to assess what India had done. India now very well knows, Pakistan nuclear threat is a bluff, they do not have the resolve to up the ante or the resources to sustain a fight even for a day. Hence, they did what they do best - that is to LIE. Now, they have to keep it up with more lies.

If reports of India capturing Pakistan's territory is true, it shows how well we have assessed their capabilities ..rather the lack of it!

How is the josh?

 

[patriots]

303030300303030030030303003003

 

[Jaymax61]

What exactly is a large sized UAV package?

I guess, they thought that their F-16s would give their UAVs cover to sneak in, but their jets got painted and ran off.



Even the one operational is partially so. What a pathetic Navy. Heck, it doesn't deserve to be called a Navy.

More probable answer - Pakistan is running aggressive exercises close to the border. They saw the Indian Sukhois and prudently backed off to prevent any incident. With the current level of readiness, sneaking in a "Large UAV" is next to impossible. They are big noisy and move slowly and have ZERO stealth.

Pak is doing its own thing just like the IAF. They were coming close to the border so the IAF sent someone to drop by and say hello. There is nothing more to it.

 

[Kazah]

Lol!! According to him two jets crossed LOC, and after crossing LOC they were shot down in Pakistani territory. If they were shot down deep inside Pakistani territory then how come one jet fell on the other side of LOC??
This Ghaffor is the biggest chutiya I have seen so far. "Matlab kuchh bhi bakk Dena hai BC"

Jhoot Pe Jhoot bol Rha hai, pakda zaroor jaega ek din

 

[trisonics]

A new narrative has started to emerge on Paki forums. They now claim that Abhinandan was counted twice and hence the initial reporting of 2 pilots. :biggrin2: