India Launched Surgical Strikes Across LoC: DGMO 29/09/2016
- Thread starter hit&run
- Start date
Scarface
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2015
- Messages
- 443
- Likes
- 246
Who are you quoting ? I'd like to know.
Well said by the way.
Off-topic
Now the leftists that were going rabid will pretend to be satisfied and happy but really,they're just mad they can't criticize Modi anymore.
tejas warrior
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
- Messages
- 1,268
- Likes
- 3,723
Saurav at his Best !!
Pakistanis should be a little circumspect in saying 'fabricated' or footage might just end up being released to embarrass them.
Pakistanis should be a little circumspect in saying 'fabricated' or footage might just end up being released to embarrass them.
Kashmir attack: India 'launches strikes against militants'
Image copyrightAFP
Image captionRelations between India and Pakistan have deteriorated in recent months
India's army says it has carried out "surgical strikes" against suspected militants along the de-facto border with Pakistan in Kashmir.
The operation was aimed at preventing attacks being planned by Pakistan-based militants, a senior army official said.
He said "significant casualties have been caused to the terrorists and those who are trying to support them".
Pakistan denies India carried out any strikes and says two of its soldiers were killed in cross-border shelling.
"The notion of surgical strike linked to alleged terrorists' bases is an illusion being deliberately generated by India to create false effects," the Pakistani military said in a statement.
Pakistan said its soldiers died in "unprovoked" firing along the Line of Control dividing the disputed region.
A territorial dispute between the two countries over Muslim-majority Kashmir has been running for decades, but tensions flared earlier this month after a militant attack on an Indian army base in Kashmir left 18 soldiers dead.
India blamed the attack on Pakistan, which denied the claim.
What do we know about the 'strikes'?
India's military gave few details of the operation it says it carried out overnight.
At a joint press briefing by the army and the foreign ministry, officials said the "motive of the operation was to hit out at terrorists who were planning to infiltrate into our territory".
India's Director General of Military Operations, Lt Gen Ranbir Singh, also blamed Pakistan for "being unable to control terror activities in territories under its control".
Image copyrightAFP
"Based on receiving specific and credible inputs that some terrorist teams had positioned themselves at launch pads along the Line of Control to carry out infiltration and conduct terrorist strikes inside Jammu and Kashmir and in various metros in other states, the Indian army conducted surgical strikes at several of these launch pads to pre-empt infiltration by terrorists," a statement said.
It said the "surgical strikes" had caused "significant damage to terrorists".
But the army did not say whether troops had entered Pakistan-administered Kashmir or had fired across the border.
Image copyrightEPA
Image captionBoth countries lay claim to Kashmir but in reality control only parts of it
However, the Press Trust of India quoted sources saying the operation took place between midnight and 04:30 local time on Thursday, that it was a combination of helicopter and ground forces, and seven militant "launch pads" had been targeted.
Some unconfirmed Indian media reports said more than 30 militants had been killed in the operation.
Pakistani army officials said the fighting started in the early hours of Thursday morning and continued for about six hours.
Indian army's anger over Kashmir killings
Why now?
Narendra Modi's BJP government swept to power promising a tough line on Pakistan, so it has been been under tremendous pressure to retaliate after the 18 September attack on the army base in Uri in Indian-administered Kashmir. The raid was the deadliest of its kind for years.
Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionTensions have risen since a deadly militant attack on an Indian army base earlier this month
"I assure the nation that those behind this despicable attack will not go unpunished," Mr Modi declared just hours after the base was attacked.
There was also much talk of whether India should continue with its doctrine of "strategic restraint" against Pakistan.
A "strike" now is seen by many observers as aimed at placating an angry domestic constituency and sending out the message that Mr Modi is a strong leader.
What's behind Kashmir's deadliest militant raid in years?
What does Pakistan say?
The country's prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, criticised the "unprovoked and naked aggression of Indian forces" and said his military was capable of thwarting "any evil design to undermine the sovereignty of Pakistan".
Islamabad says India's stance is a "blatant attempt" to deflect attention from human rights abuses in the region.
More than 80 people, nearly all anti-government protesters, have died in more than two months of violence against Indian rule.
What about India? By Soutik Biswas
Many say jingoism and war-mongering are the twin obsessions of a growing and increasingly prosperous middle class in India, and the reaction to the latest attack is quite predictable.
#ModiPunishesPak was trending top of Twitter in India, hours after the media first reported "the strikes". The other top trending hashtags included #SurgicalStrike and #Indian Army. A Narendra Modi fan club account tweeted a clip from a Tom and Jerry cartoon film to show India spanking Pakistan.
Government supporters gushed that this was a "proud moment for India", with one Bollywood actor thanking the army for doing what India "should have done 30 years ago".
A clutch of news channels were waxing delirious on how India had taught Pakistan a lesson and speculated endlessly about the details of the operation.
Things were much more serious between the two nuclear-armed rivals, they say, after the 2001 attack by Pakistan-based militants on the Indian parliament but there was no social media then, and the calls to escalate the conflict were more muted.
Why India needs cool heads
Why is Kashmir so dangerous?
Both India and Pakistan claim Muslim-majority Kashmir in its entirety but control only parts of it.
The territorial dispute between the two countries has been running for over six decades, and two out of the three wars fought between the nuclear-armed rivals have been over Kashmir.
As with every stand-off in Kashmir, the fear of many is that this could eventually escalate into a major clash between two nuclear-armed states.
But most analysts still believe that is unlikely to happen and that sporadic clashes and diplomatic sabre-rattling are likely to continue.
Why India's water dispute with Pakistan matters
Disputed Kashmir profiled
Concern over Kashmir police's pellet guns
Viewpoint: Living in the shadow of Kashmir
Viewpoint: Why mass funerals spark violence in Kashmir
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37504308
- 1 hour ago
- From the sectionIndia
Image captionRelations between India and Pakistan have deteriorated in recent months
India's army says it has carried out "surgical strikes" against suspected militants along the de-facto border with Pakistan in Kashmir.
The operation was aimed at preventing attacks being planned by Pakistan-based militants, a senior army official said.
He said "significant casualties have been caused to the terrorists and those who are trying to support them".
Pakistan denies India carried out any strikes and says two of its soldiers were killed in cross-border shelling.
"The notion of surgical strike linked to alleged terrorists' bases is an illusion being deliberately generated by India to create false effects," the Pakistani military said in a statement.
Pakistan said its soldiers died in "unprovoked" firing along the Line of Control dividing the disputed region.
A territorial dispute between the two countries over Muslim-majority Kashmir has been running for decades, but tensions flared earlier this month after a militant attack on an Indian army base in Kashmir left 18 soldiers dead.
India blamed the attack on Pakistan, which denied the claim.
What do we know about the 'strikes'?
India's military gave few details of the operation it says it carried out overnight.
At a joint press briefing by the army and the foreign ministry, officials said the "motive of the operation was to hit out at terrorists who were planning to infiltrate into our territory".
India's Director General of Military Operations, Lt Gen Ranbir Singh, also blamed Pakistan for "being unable to control terror activities in territories under its control".
"Based on receiving specific and credible inputs that some terrorist teams had positioned themselves at launch pads along the Line of Control to carry out infiltration and conduct terrorist strikes inside Jammu and Kashmir and in various metros in other states, the Indian army conducted surgical strikes at several of these launch pads to pre-empt infiltration by terrorists," a statement said.
It said the "surgical strikes" had caused "significant damage to terrorists".
But the army did not say whether troops had entered Pakistan-administered Kashmir or had fired across the border.
Image captionBoth countries lay claim to Kashmir but in reality control only parts of it
However, the Press Trust of India quoted sources saying the operation took place between midnight and 04:30 local time on Thursday, that it was a combination of helicopter and ground forces, and seven militant "launch pads" had been targeted.
Some unconfirmed Indian media reports said more than 30 militants had been killed in the operation.
Pakistani army officials said the fighting started in the early hours of Thursday morning and continued for about six hours.
Indian army's anger over Kashmir killings
Why now?
Narendra Modi's BJP government swept to power promising a tough line on Pakistan, so it has been been under tremendous pressure to retaliate after the 18 September attack on the army base in Uri in Indian-administered Kashmir. The raid was the deadliest of its kind for years.
Image captionTensions have risen since a deadly militant attack on an Indian army base earlier this month
"I assure the nation that those behind this despicable attack will not go unpunished," Mr Modi declared just hours after the base was attacked.
There was also much talk of whether India should continue with its doctrine of "strategic restraint" against Pakistan.
A "strike" now is seen by many observers as aimed at placating an angry domestic constituency and sending out the message that Mr Modi is a strong leader.
What's behind Kashmir's deadliest militant raid in years?
What does Pakistan say?
The country's prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, criticised the "unprovoked and naked aggression of Indian forces" and said his military was capable of thwarting "any evil design to undermine the sovereignty of Pakistan".
Islamabad says India's stance is a "blatant attempt" to deflect attention from human rights abuses in the region.
More than 80 people, nearly all anti-government protesters, have died in more than two months of violence against Indian rule.
What about India? By Soutik Biswas
Many say jingoism and war-mongering are the twin obsessions of a growing and increasingly prosperous middle class in India, and the reaction to the latest attack is quite predictable.
#ModiPunishesPak was trending top of Twitter in India, hours after the media first reported "the strikes". The other top trending hashtags included #SurgicalStrike and #Indian Army. A Narendra Modi fan club account tweeted a clip from a Tom and Jerry cartoon film to show India spanking Pakistan.
Government supporters gushed that this was a "proud moment for India", with one Bollywood actor thanking the army for doing what India "should have done 30 years ago".
A clutch of news channels were waxing delirious on how India had taught Pakistan a lesson and speculated endlessly about the details of the operation.
Things were much more serious between the two nuclear-armed rivals, they say, after the 2001 attack by Pakistan-based militants on the Indian parliament but there was no social media then, and the calls to escalate the conflict were more muted.
Why India needs cool heads
Why is Kashmir so dangerous?
Both India and Pakistan claim Muslim-majority Kashmir in its entirety but control only parts of it.
The territorial dispute between the two countries has been running for over six decades, and two out of the three wars fought between the nuclear-armed rivals have been over Kashmir.
As with every stand-off in Kashmir, the fear of many is that this could eventually escalate into a major clash between two nuclear-armed states.
But most analysts still believe that is unlikely to happen and that sporadic clashes and diplomatic sabre-rattling are likely to continue.
Why India's water dispute with Pakistan matters
Disputed Kashmir profiled
Concern over Kashmir police's pellet guns
Viewpoint: Living in the shadow of Kashmir
Viewpoint: Why mass funerals spark violence in Kashmir
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37504308
- Joined
- May 29, 2009
- Messages
- 14,104
- Likes
- 63,378
Old video.
Cowards threw a Grenade at solider guarding the post next to border fence when he was neither engage in combat nor carrying a weapon and there was mutually signed ceasefire in place .
BTW Pakistanis will invent as many lies in the book to diffuse today's misery.
Security of leadership must be made invincible now and extra precautions be taken as there will surge in political rallies.
abingdonboy
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2010
- Messages
- 8,084
- Likes
- 33,803
Also, let us not forget that Pakistan's true capabilities have been on show for the world the past week (Ex "High mark") and they have already lost 3 platforms (1 UAV, 1 F-7, 1 JF-17) Meainwhile the IAF is restarting their EX Talon ( that had already successfully been completed a few days back with no serious incidents to speak of). If this is their operational capabilities and what happens when the PAF is pushed into high tempo then India need not even start a conflict.
Darth Malgus
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2016
- Messages
- 2,439
- Likes
- 8,782
Wasn't there supposed to be another press briefing at 6:00pm ? BTW i also heard of a HVT being killed, any more news on that ?
Darth Malgus
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2016
- Messages
- 2,439
- Likes
- 8,782
Army should wait a couple of days until the Lutyans come out of the closet to claim its "fake", and then release the Video evidence...
Deltamendota
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2014
- Messages
- 56
- Likes
- 268
hafiz saeed / Dawood ibrahim must be shitting in their respective pants right now ....
Darth Malgus
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2016
- Messages
- 2,439
- Likes
- 8,782
2 HVT were present in the camps, am just waiting for some clarification of the Army after this...hafiz saed / Dwood ibrahim must be shitting in their respective pants right now ....
Darth Malgus
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2016
- Messages
- 2,439
- Likes
- 8,782
How can they ? Pakistanis themselves are confused bunch
ISPR - Denies Strike
Govt - Condemns Strike
FO - "Getting more information"
Maybe Nawaz is celebrating right now, Raheel can quietly go..
abingdonboy
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2010
- Messages
- 8,084
- Likes
- 33,803
Wow. Just wow.Kashmir attack: India 'launches strikes against militants'
Share
- 1 hour ago
- From the sectionIndia
Image copyrightAFP
Image captionRelations between India and Pakistan have deteriorated in recent months
India's army says it has carried out "surgical strikes" against suspected militants along the de-facto border with Pakistan in Kashmir.
The operation was aimed at preventing attacks being planned by Pakistan-based militants, a senior army official said.
He said "significant casualties have been caused to the terrorists and those who are trying to support them".
Pakistan denies India carried out any strikes and says two of its soldiers were killed in cross-border shelling.
"The notion of surgical strike linked to alleged terrorists' bases is an illusion being deliberately generated by India to create false effects," the Pakistani military said in a statement.
Pakistan said its soldiers died in "unprovoked" firing along the Line of Control dividing the disputed region.
A territorial dispute between the two countries over Muslim-majority Kashmir has been running for decades, but tensions flared earlier this month after a militant attack on an Indian army base in Kashmir left 18 soldiers dead.
India blamed the attack on Pakistan, which denied the claim.
What do we know about the 'strikes'?
India's military gave few details of the operation it says it carried out overnight.
At a joint press briefing by the army and the foreign ministry, officials said the "motive of the operation was to hit out at terrorists who were planning to infiltrate into our territory".
India's Director General of Military Operations, Lt Gen Ranbir Singh, also blamed Pakistan for "being unable to control terror activities in territories under its control".
Image copyrightAFP
"Based on receiving specific and credible inputs that some terrorist teams had positioned themselves at launch pads along the Line of Control to carry out infiltration and conduct terrorist strikes inside Jammu and Kashmir and in various metros in other states, the Indian army conducted surgical strikes at several of these launch pads to pre-empt infiltration by terrorists," a statement said.
It said the "surgical strikes" had caused "significant damage to terrorists".
But the army did not say whether troops had entered Pakistan-administered Kashmir or had fired across the border.
Image copyrightEPA
Image captionBoth countries lay claim to Kashmir but in reality control only parts of it
However, the Press Trust of India quoted sources saying the operation took place between midnight and 04:30 local time on Thursday, that it was a combination of helicopter and ground forces, and seven militant "launch pads" had been targeted.
Some unconfirmed Indian media reports said more than 30 militants had been killed in the operation.
Pakistani army officials said the fighting started in the early hours of Thursday morning and continued for about six hours.
Indian army's anger over Kashmir killings
Why now?
Narendra Modi's BJP government swept to power promising a tough line on Pakistan, so it has been been under tremendous pressure to retaliate after the 18 September attack on the army base in Uri in Indian-administered Kashmir. The raid was the deadliest of its kind for years.
Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionTensions have risen since a deadly militant attack on an Indian army base earlier this month
"I assure the nation that those behind this despicable attack will not go unpunished," Mr Modi declared just hours after the base was attacked.
There was also much talk of whether India should continue with its doctrine of "strategic restraint" against Pakistan.
A "strike" now is seen by many observers as aimed at placating an angry domestic constituency and sending out the message that Mr Modi is a strong leader.
What's behind Kashmir's deadliest militant raid in years?
What does Pakistan say?
The country's prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, criticised the "unprovoked and naked aggression of Indian forces" and said his military was capable of thwarting "any evil design to undermine the sovereignty of Pakistan".
Islamabad says India's stance is a "blatant attempt" to deflect attention from human rights abuses in the region.
More than 80 people, nearly all anti-government protesters, have died in more than two months of violence against Indian rule.
What about India? By Soutik Biswas
Many say jingoism and war-mongering are the twin obsessions of a growing and increasingly prosperous middle class in India, and the reaction to the latest attack is quite predictable.
#ModiPunishesPak was trending top of Twitter in India, hours after the media first reported "the strikes". The other top trending hashtags included #SurgicalStrike and #Indian Army. A Narendra Modi fan club account tweeted a clip from a Tom and Jerry cartoon film to show India spanking Pakistan.
Government supporters gushed that this was a "proud moment for India", with one Bollywood actor thanking the army for doing what India "should have done 30 years ago".
A clutch of news channels were waxing delirious on how India had taught Pakistan a lesson and speculated endlessly about the details of the operation.
Things were much more serious between the two nuclear-armed rivals, they say, after the 2001 attack by Pakistan-based militants on the Indian parliament but there was no social media then, and the calls to escalate the conflict were more muted.
Why India needs cool heads
Why is Kashmir so dangerous?
Both India and Pakistan claim Muslim-majority Kashmir in its entirety but control only parts of it.
The territorial dispute between the two countries has been running for over six decades, and two out of the three wars fought between the nuclear-armed rivals have been over Kashmir.
As with every stand-off in Kashmir, the fear of many is that this could eventually escalate into a major clash between two nuclear-armed states.
But most analysts still believe that is unlikely to happen and that sporadic clashes and diplomatic sabre-rattling are likely to continue.
Why India's water dispute with Pakistan matters
Disputed Kashmir profiled
Concern over Kashmir police's pellet guns
Viewpoint: Living in the shadow of Kashmir
Viewpoint: Why mass funerals spark violence in Kashmir
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37504308
The entire tone is sneering and patronising and tries to make out these attacks were merely an attempt by a nationalist government to placate a warmongering populace. Entirely ignoring the fact that these terrorists that were hit were gearing up to launch attacks on India.
When Western nations take these steps they are labelled "bold" or "proactive", when India does it this is the response it gets?
Don't remember anyone trying to claim Obama had taken out OBL to placate his electorate.
Fuck the BBC.
raheel besharam
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 851
- Likes
- 2,002
even kadi ninda wala started trolling porkies
abingdonboy
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2010
- Messages
- 8,084
- Likes
- 33,803
Give Special Group the green light and these fuckers will be dead by the end of the year.
WARREN SS
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2013
- Messages
- 5,570
- Likes
- 20,878
Pakistani's Heart burning just seen Propaganda threads after threads in PDF :blah::blah:
Some one should tell them!!! Pakistani Establishment Never accepted Kargil Infiltration Officially Till Now Let Alone these Strike
There Propaganda Machine ISPR IS BUSY IN CONSOLING gERNALS 
Some one should tell them!!! Pakistani Establishment Never accepted Kargil Infiltration Officially Till Now Let Alone these Strike
There Propaganda Machine ISPR IS BUSY IN CONSOLING gERNALS
Darth Malgus
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2016
- Messages
- 2,439
- Likes
- 8,782
I have a question
Will Army take over or will Nawaz expoit the Embarrassed Army...
Will Army take over or will Nawaz expoit the Embarrassed Army...
