pmaitra
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33,262
- Likes
- 19,600
This has nothing to do with blasphemy. It would be relevant in the theological/religious context, but not in the context of aviation. Think of Javagal Srinath and Wasim Akram. How they swing the ball is all about fluid mechanics and physics, and has nothing to do with religion, theology, blasphemy or Abrahamics. Similarly, how the aircraft flies should also be about build mechanics or physics.The point that Tejas usage is defined as light weight fighter and improving its performance is BLASPHEMY even though perfectly feasible just because it has already been defined is what I am peeved about.
Why define the developmental needs in such a narrow manner? Why not define it as 'as good as possible'. This is what I state as abrahamic fanatic - the revelation is final even though there is no reason to justify.
Let us be more open. I am trying to say that if it is possible to be done, then do it.
Indian primary security requirements is in its neighbourhood. There is little need to bring in heavy weight fighters with 4000km range for it. It is also possible to double up Tejas as a better fighter
The laws of physics are same for everyone. No amount of sloganeering will change that.