You can create a new thread in the following section.Of course brothers. In which section should I post it? I am still getting used to the format.
India is viewed neutrally. Afghans are not Wahabbis like some in the media try to portray us. We are mostly Hanafi Muslims, but we have Hindus, Sikhs, even some Jews living among us. India is one of the few nations in the region which did not extend its support to the "Mujahideen," but supported the legitimate government. Of course, we have plenty of ex-pats with agendas. I don't doubt some were raised in Pakistan and hate India because the madrassahs, but if you meet one just give him a good kick in the teeth. That should straighten them out.Kabuli, can you tell me, as what kind of general perception held by Afgan Citizens for the Indian people? I mean what kind of a thinking they possess for all we Indians?
Yes majority of Afghans are PashtunsDoes Afghans are mostly Pashtun's?
Demography of Afghanistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaBased on official census numbers from the 1960s to the 1980s, as well as information found in mainly scholarly sources, the Encyclopædia Iranica[10] gives the following list:
- 39.4% Pashtun
- 33.7% Tajik, Farsiwan, and Qezelbash
- 8.0% Hazara
- 8.0% Uzbek
- 4.1% Aimak
- 3.3% Turkmen
- 1.6% Baloch
- 1.9% other
An approximate distribution of ethnic groups based on the CIA World Factbook[12] is as following:
According to a representative survey, named "A survey of the Afghan people - Afghanistan in 2006", a combined project of The Asia Foundation, the Indian Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) and the Afghan Center for Socio-economic and Opinion Research (ACSOR), the distribution of the ethnic groups is:[13]
- Pashtun: 42%
- Tajik: 27%
- Hazara: 9%
- Uzbek: 9%
- Aimak: 4%
- Turkmen: 3%
- Baloch: 2%
- Other: 4%
- 40.9% Pashtun
- 37.1% Tajik
- 9.2% Hazara
- 9.2% Uzbek
- 1.7% Turkmen
- 0.5% Baloch
- 0.1% Aimak
- 1.3% other
According to another representative survey, named "Afghanistan: Where Things Stand", a combined effort by the American broadcasting channel ABC News, the British BBC, and the German ARD (from the years 2004 to 2009), and released on February 9th 2009, the ethnic composition of the country is (avarege numbers):[14]
- 41% Pashtun
- 38% Tajik
- 10% Hazara
- 6% Uzbek
- 2% Turkmen
- 1% Nuristani
- 1% Baloch
- 1% other
Yes, I think Pakistan has almost double the number of Pushtuns that Afghanistan has.@Vinod:thanks for that info.
We know that Western Pakistan also got Pashtun Population including NWFP.I hope ,the people there be secular as well.
--
I think its correct to compare it to kashmir issue.Yes, I think Pakistan has almost double the number of Pushtuns that Afghanistan has.
And if I am not mistaken, the Afghans want to "liberate" them the same way as the Paksitanis want to "liberate" Kashmiris!
I think the former is much more likely.
I think the Pushtuns on both sides of Durand are really the same people and share historical bonds. Pakistanis have nothing to do with Kashmiris any more than they had to do with Bangladeshis! They were a part of Pakistan and went their own way. The West Paksitanis never tried to unite back with them.I think its correct to compare it to kashmir issue.
Yes, that is what I have read multiple times. I think I even read a statement by Karzai along these lines.It would be interesting to hear form kabuli on this since he is afghani.
Vinod does the afghani pashtuns want to liberate the pakistani pashtuns in your opinion.
So you think its better to be facinated by bengalis.I think the Pushtuns on both sides of Durand are really the same people and share historical bonds. Pakistanis have nothing to do with Kashmiris any more than they had to do with Bangladeshis! They were a part of Pakistan and went their own way. The West Paksitanis never tried to unite back with them.
It is a bit strange to see them so fascinated with Indian Kashmiris.
Yes, that is what I have read multiple times. I think I even read a statement by Karzai along these lines.
And why not?So you think its better to be facinated by bengalis.
Its a independent state.And why not?
The same should apply to their fascination for Kashmir too.Its a independent state.
Closed chapter for pakistan.
You mean east pakistan. Now its bangladesh. Closed chapter.The same should apply to their fascination for Kashmir too.
Kashmir was never a part of Pakistan, Bangladesh was.
If they can live without the latter, why not the former!
Good to know that!You mean east pakistan. Now its bangladesh. Closed chapter.
Yes, that part is a dispute. :blum3:We still have part of kashmir. Its a dispute.
The Indian Kashmir is a closed chapter after the IOA was signed. They are Indians like all other Indians.It isnt a closed chapter.
If you do not recognize that its a dispute. It just show your lack of knowlegde.Good to know that!
Yes, that part is a dispute. :blum3:
The Indian Kashmir is a closed chapter after the IOA was signed. They are Indians like all other Indians.