Nope.Ballistic missiles have a larger heat signature and a trajectory which makes them easier for detection . But Chinese claim this is a glide vehicle which would mean more or less undetectable.
Laser is coming.........................The BMD systems developed by America still has the capability to handle these hypersonic missiles in terms of speed as many ballistic missiles have higher speed than these hypersonic cruise missiles. But main worry is maneuverability as ballistic missiles have a max maneuverability of 5g,with these highly maneuverable hypersonic missiles BMD systems will virtually be rendered useless.
Nope.
As soon as you touch these speeds, due to the physics of hypersonic you will be detected.... glide or no glide, its the intense motion and heat in the air that gives you up.
Not in the case of hypersonics....Glide bombs give very to no heat signature
http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/...ass-indigenous-guided-glide-bomb.65864/page-2
Hoho ... ok But i am just saying for all the advantages of hypersonics, stealth is not one.... thats all.@Rowdy Bro you are seriously underestimating hypersonic kills. Let me is if this is convincing for you.
Basic premise - time difference between the defender' counter and the attacker's evasion will always be decided by physical constraints and reaction timings thereof (attitude control motors, LD ratios, TW ratios) and these will always favour the fast attacker. Thus faster the attacker smaller the time difference that defender has to react. This was the start point for both the BM and the BMD. For a BM the last mile was kinematically the most energetic while the for the BMD the corresponding first mile was the hardest since it has to start from a dead stop. Also you must have noticed how the defender (eg. AAM) actually has to move faster and bear higher g-forces to be able to go after a slower bogie.
Counter - Fast speeds force linear predictable trajectories. BMD scores at either very high altitudes where usually you expect lesser maneuvering by the very high speed old style cheap RV (Aegis BMD) or if the just wait for the terminal phase of a slower moving expensive cruise missile (Aegis Combat System).
Counter Punch - Complicate the trajectories of the attacker and dominate by changing the expected kinematics of the BMD. This is where the PBV, MaRV, BGRV, MIRV, MRV, AMaRV, PGRV et al come in. The current 'disclosed' differences in velocities of a a PGRV and BMD is like 6 mach and if you want to achieve the minimum distance of say 332 meters to be able to evade even the directional warheads, you have to put a time difference of mere 0.16 seconds between the PGRV and BMD.
Double Punch - Hypersonic vehicles which do not even have a classical boost phase and mid course of a BM, that was the first warning for a physically slow system like a BMD. And yet boast of a being able to use to their advantage the aerodynamics afforded by mother nature, coincidentally the very thing that actually makes a defender slow.
!@#$%^& aka Some of the solutions but all of them exceedingly costly and yet with limited capacity - take the sensors to space aka SBIRS successor programs + take the BMD into space + DEW + Kinetic kill vehicles powered by rail guns.
Knock Out Punch - The exchange ratios were already tilted in favour of the attacker at the Counter Punch stage. The Double Punch will take at least 20-30 years to be successfully countered in any real manner ie. after accounting for exchange ratios. !@#$%^& stage is so expensive that even US will find it difficult to take that route, managing a Debt-GDP ratio that is already worse than the one in 1945.
Chinese and others have learnt the lessons of the Cold War well. They know how the Soviets were countered. And these new challengers are not going to walk the trap even while they will lay their own traps.
West ko chane ke jhaad pe chadhaya ja raha hai. Aur wo aadat se majboor hain.
O yaar Stealth was never any real advantage.Hoho ... ok But i am just saying for all the advantages of hypersonics, stealth is not one.... thats all.
There is no engine in the traditional sense giving off exhaust.Not in the case of hypersonics....
Now it'll be tested on the second half of the October month as per some news articles.INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION TO TEST ITS REUSABLE RLV SPACECRAFT
Artist's rendering of the Reusable Launch Vehicle-Technology Demonstration Program.
Image Credit: ISRO
TOMASZ NOWAKOWSKI
JUNE 2ND, 2015
The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO ) is planning the first test of its homegrown fully Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV). The RLV-TD (Technology Demonstrator) mission is currently scheduled to be sent aloft in late July or early August, according to M.C. Dathan, the Director of Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC).
The RLV, resembling a small winged aircraft, will be launched up to an altitude of 43 miles (70 km) from atop a solid booster rocket and then released. The spacecraft will re-enter the atmosphere and travel back to Earth in a controlled descent, to be recovered from the sea.
“It will be a winged vehicle that will take off vertically like a rocket and glide back to land horizontally like a plane,” said S. Somanath, the VSSC Deputy Director.
The development of RLV is in the final stages. The spacecraft has been configured to act as a flying test bed to evaluate various technologies; namely, hypersonic flight, autonomous landing, powered cruise flight, and hypersonic flight using air-breathing propulsion.
“The first stage burns on solid fuel. Atop it is the space plane which will return to Earth after the flight,” said ISRO chief Kiran Kumar.
Flight profile of the ISRO’s Reusable Launch Vehicle. Image Credit: ISRO
The first in the series of experimental flights is the hypersonic flight experiment (HEX) followed by the landing experiment (LEX), the return flight experiment (REX), and the scramjet propulsion experiment (SPEX).
A 2.5 mile (4 km) runway would be constructed for the RLV to make a horizontal landing in the subsequent test flights.
The RLV would be powered by an air-breathing scramjet currently under development. The first prototype of the scramjet with a 10 kg thrust is due to be tested in about one month’s time, followed by the development of a test facility for a more powerful engine.
ISRO hopes that RLV will cut satellite launch costs from $5,000 to $500 per every 2 lbs (1 kg).
“Development of RLV is a technical challenge and it involves development of cutting edge technologies. The magnitude of cost reduction depends on development and realization of fully reusable launch vehicle and its degree of reusability,” said Jitendra Singh, India’s Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office.
The test is a part of a larger plan to build a fully functional two stage to orbit (TSTO) fully re-usable vehicle.
If successful, the program would reduce the cost of space missions, making India more competitive in the launcher market.
http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/o...nisation-to-test-its-reusable-rlv-spacecraft/