These "India is for Indians regardless of religious beliefs" need to go and live in Malapurram, West UP, Old Hyderabad, Kashmir or WB border districts & see if its really true.
You are true but without a rationale the truth escapes even the attentive people.
With statements like "India is for Indians regardless of religious beliefs" what is effectively being said is?
Let me tell you.
Hey Hindu, the country has been invented for you in advanced/improved/modern form on August 15, 1947, so fall in line. Whatever your poorvaj did/experienced, before that date does not count and after that date you are effectively 'redeemed'. After that date you have rights only as much as are allowed in the constitution and none beyond. You have duties that will effectively be put in the constitution as we go along.
Duh!
Now the reality of India which is in sharp contrast to the reality of the above statement.
Hindu is a cultural identity and a geopolitical identity, a historical identity, a common future, is a subset of that cultural identity. We have lost so much and given so much that there effectively is nothing to be given now with us anymore. It is Hindus (includes all Dharmics, in this write up) who sweated for this common fate. It is hindus that lead the thought process behind all this. If today the constitution is upheld it is in the main because of Hindu efforts to protect and prosper under it. Not because the constitution protects the Hindus. Since times immemorial only Satya and Dharm has saved Hindus. Not the constitution. The question of the constitution affording us protection and growth simply does not arise because even the proponents of this inorganic growth themselves admit/concede happened only well after August 15, 1947. The protection and growth could not have been afforded in any manner before that. In fact the system that worked under the legal framework prior to the present constitution actively and quite successfully undermined the very concept of India. Dharma starts with putting the Satya above all else and it is Satya that fights for Dharm. That is why Dharm lives on in India. Constitution is a system where the 'Written Word' is supposedly supreme and not Satya. For all practical purposes, the present constitution is a lopsided creation which is currently working to enslave, en-mass the hindus of India. That is why Hindus get aggravated and then chose their own kind to the power. These empowered nominees are then expected to wield the constitution properly. Now this can only be a temporary respite because, if empowerment is the only criteria for making the constitution work then such empowerment can also easily be again misused against the Hindus. Thus ultimately the Satya/Ram again has to be 'reinstalled'. We cannot for any serious length of time allow the 'written word' to overtake the 'satya/reality' of this country. Actually Satya/Ram never went away from this land. It is just a MSM report or Text Book History, that says it happened so and its foolish to believe MSM reports and fake Histories that get forgotten in the next class. It is only for the sake of this Satya/Ram, that the other people are allowed to remain on the geographical entity called India.
The whole though process is so entrenched that for all effects and purpose, large numbers of even Muslims (largest Abrahmic grouping in subcontinent) has failed to develop a true common cause or common identity. That is why the inordinate focus on muslim eating, muslim dressing and muslim lingo. If only add ons like muslim eating, muslim dressing and muslim lingo actually could have added up to a common fate and a common reality (ie. history), then the muslims across the world would have recognized them for that reason. Quite to the contrary Muslims of the subcontinent are despised across the globe and it is actually the Indian identity (based entirely upon hindu value systems) that they escape gross attention from foreigners in other parts of the world.
Ultimately these Abrahmics, esp. the Muslims, considering they are the biggest group have to realize that they are trying to shake off a fate/identity that is stuck with them on account of their being born in the subcontinent. They can chose to hate themselves or even us for that reason. For the reason of being unable to develop as a separate identity. But then they will have to look over to the Middle-East at the same time. What do they see over there? Do they like it?
And if they do not they why to allow it to fester in Malapurram, West UP, Old Hyderabad, Kashmir or WB border districts, in the first place. And even if you would, we won't
. Consider this a service to our common ancestors
.
:hippo:
