Please keep quiet and stop sermonising. Bleh!It makes MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION more certain.....When many major nations have such highly destructive weapons....peace will be only option. Either All live OR all die !! Time is coming for "live and let live" thing Gandhi said.....Time is running out for "live and let die" James Bond thingi.!
India was attacked in 1999, Russia was attacked in Chechnya, Yugoslavia was attacked by NATO. Pakistn gets drone strike every now and then.One simple question: Has any nation with Nuclear Weapons ever been attacked by any other nation ? NO.
If Japan Had Nuclear weapons..could Hiroshima and Nagasaki would have been decimated ? NO.
Bitter truth is that Nuclear weapons are the most powerful deterrent...
Lastly..Kshithjj..you are nobody to tell me to be quiet ..I am using my right to voice my opinion....If you can
not digest my opinion..you can block me...I am not sermonising..I am telling raw truth..
A bully only bullies other persons as long as he believes that other person can not credibly break his arm or leg.
The minute a bully realizes that the other person have sufficient courage and means to counterattack and cause severe injury to the bully.....the bully quickly backs off and leaves that person alone..to pick on some other weaker target..
I'm surprised you askin this mate.Why now of all times ??????????
Would you like a world where every country with the money can just make nuclear weapons if it feels like it? Sure its hypocritical for nuclear powers like us to tell others they shouldnt make nukes, but it is better for everyone if the club stays small. Otherwise we'll have 30-40 nuclear weapons states, half of them unstable regimes in the middle east. The only country keeping the club small is the US along with its client states.And these Yanks are pressurising North Korea to cease all their missile tests or face more sanctions.
But then rules and propriety don't apply to this lone super power. For them 'it's my or the highway'.
How about Pakistan? It's far more unstable than North Korea. But the US of A and the West in general are doing squat about it. Double standards? Favouritism? Providing logistics for the US troops in Afghanistan? 'Support' in the WOT?Would you like a world where every country with the money can just make nuclear weapons if it feels like it? Sure its hypocritical for nuclear powers like us to tell others they shouldnt make nukes, but it is better for everyone if the club stays small. Otherwise we'll have 30-40 nuclear weapons states, half of them unstable regimes in the middle east. The only country keeping the club small is the US along with its client states.
Partial enforcement is better than no enforcement at all, which would be the situation without the US.How about Pakistan? It's far more unstable than North Korea. But the US of A and the West in general are doing squat about it. Double standards? Favouritism? Providing logistics for the US troops in Afghanistan? 'Support' in the WOT?
Pakistan was a key supplier to North Korea's secret nuclear programme, when Benazir Bhutto, went shopping for missile technology in Pyongyang in exchange for nuke equipment to include enriched uranium, including gas centrifuges.
And the irony is that they were being transported in US supplied C-130s!! The Yanks knew of this blatant proliferation but chose to turn a blind eye to Pak's shenanigans. Why? Because it was a frontline state and a buffer to the then soviet Union in Afghanistan. So it's not only that the US wants to keep the nuke club small but will turn a blind eye to such nuke proliferation as long as it serves their interests.