@Bengal_Tiger India will back Hasina may what come and India went against US few years ago when the Americans wanted to put pressure to change India's position v/s Hasina ... they failed ... Infact I would say Hasina is doing very well for Bangladesh still I hear people complaining ... 1) The BSF firing at the border, it has come down drastically and now days BSF carry non lethal bullets and this was brought about through discussions and reasoning's ... 2) Under Hasina Bangladesh defense buildups & procurement is far better than Khalida's ... 3) Hasina has a level head in closing the disputes with other countries, example the maritime disputes with Myanmar & India that went Bangladesh favor.
India wants one simple aspects... please do not allow your land to lunch attacks against India and India is not bothered about you or whatever you do in your country... Hasina was clever to understand it better than Khalida...
India also stood strong with Iran when it was under sanctions from US and its allies... India used to make payments for Iranian oil by gold as any financial transactions was illegal due to sanctions... Iranians are very happy and we have a very strong relationship with Iran...
1. The BNP-Jamaat nexus turned Bangladesh in to a Pakistani surrogate.
2. However for the sake of balance and wider intellectual awareness they would say that they decided to carry out their anti-India policies of backing anti-Indian separatists as a reaction to previous New Delhi administrations backing of Chakma separatists in Bangladesh.
That also by their policies they have at the least forced India not to take Bangladeshi co-operation for granted but to respect it.
3. That is what they would say, I myself personally do not like Hasina or Khaleda, there is no point in an Indian forum saying what my issues are with Hasina as they are domestic and not India-related, however yes she has helped secure better relations with India and economic growth is continuing and accelerating, though economic growth had been accelerating under the previous BNP-Jamaat government, so economic growth is not a party specific phenomenon in Bangladesh.
4. As a Bangladeshi I have no interest to harm a fellow south Asian Indic state especially when in the rest of the world we are all seen as "all the same".
Also as an ethnic Bengali I have somewhat of an aversion to the Neo-Mughal Urduwala "Muslims" who dominate Indian Muslim affairs including in west Bengal,where they are supported by Mamata.
In other words though a religious person, apart from basic civic rights, I have no interest in pan-Islamism/pan-Muslimism with Indian Muslims on a political level as the Indian Muslim elite are essentially anti-Bengali, a hostility and racism we saw pre-Pakistan, during Pakistan and to an extent that people have lesser awareness of after 1971.
The decreased awareness is that due to our victory in 1971 we have independence and there is little the neo-Mughal Urduwala Muslim elite of India can do to us, though they dominate Muslim affairs in west Bengal where they are a minority amongst Muslims.
Basically "Indian Muslims" (Urduwalas) view and treat Bengali Muslims as second-class, lower-caste and are essentially pro-Pakistan/anti-Bangladesh e.g. their support for Jamaati war criminals.
In other words I have no interest in helping communal forces in west Bengal, or anti-Indian separatists in Assam.