Aryan Invasion Theory

Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
3,691
Likes
20,012
Country flag
Toh BC aryans came to india from space? Where are pure gora gori aryan hindus of yourassia
Aryan race doesnt even exist. Rig Veda doesnt even mention anything as 'Aryan' it rather talks about 'Aryas'. Did Krishna ever called anybody as aryan putra lmao? No . Its always either Arya Putra or Arya Putri. Sundari is also adjective and its Sanskrit. So have you ever heard any thing like Sundarians and go on to make a race out of it? Pathetic school yard outcasts...

We can also add a suffix to Chutiya and make it Chutiyan race out of it. Those nutjob zooropeans are chutiyans. Why not Chutiyan genes too ?

Also, why no gora Aryans ever wore Janeau? The Persians (or what's left of them here) wear one. But Andronovo blue eyes wala Aryans only ride horses, drink wine and kill farmers. Sounds like the script of Vikings came straight out of cheaply copied Muller-ish works from British Archives.
Janeau lmfao itni aage mat pahuncho . What the fuck was tradition of yamna steppy cucks ? Raping cattles and running with shit in the pants even in 7th ad. What was the language they spoke?There is no text no tradition and absolutely nothing. They didnt even have any literature of their own and they rely 90% on SANSKRIT only for reconstruction of their half dyk pie bs which was not even spoken anywhere.

And when these cucks came to Bharat and read and learn Sanskrit here. SANSKRIT originated in BHARAT. When these school yard outcasts came to know about Sanskrit in as late as 18th ad they found a reason that all languages are inter connected the zooropean . And there begins the identity issues.

Aryan is bastardization of RIG VEDIC Arya. Arya is more like an adjective.
For example they are chootiya so you add 'an' as prefix and make it a race out of it you call Chootiyans.

Since they larp as muh huwite vedic aryans, lets start larping as vikangz, slavs, greeks, romans, celts etc. They descendend from us :rofl:
On top of that, the Saraswati civilization most advanced of her time , area had sites stretching well over 1000 miles. Even if a nomadic tribe managed to get in to , it is absolutely impossible to believe that people populating the whole area of 1000 miles will abandon their homes for a single invading tribe and flee.Making things even more unbelievable is that a bunch of nomadic cattlerapists will write down texts like Vedas and Upanishads of such profound wisdom.

Also the Rig Veda states that Aryas were urban dwellers and that they had built several hundred cities harboring an assorted collection of professions and managed using metropolitan societal rules.

B.B. Lal from Archeological Survey of BHARAT unearthed Yajna-Vedhis in Harappa. He excavated a site named Kalibagan in the Harappan site. Kalibagan was from 3rd millennium bce. Yajana-Vedhi is actually a fire altar that is built for fire sacrifices. The Vedic texts have extensively mentioned Yajna-Vedhis and yajnas or fire sacrifices. The Vedic text called SATPATHA-BRAHMANA has a detailed explanation of the whole geometry and structure of the Yajna-Vedhis. Berkeley’s University of California compared the geometry of the fire altar unearthed by Mr. Lal with Ancient Greek and Mesopotamian geometries and found that under no circumstances, the fire alter can be any younger that 1700 bce . Even this calculation predates the date of mythical invasion bs by at least 200 years.

So, Harappa was actually a part of the Vedic era that was already prevalent in BHARAT for long.
 
Last edited:

Stalingrad

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2020
Messages
153
Likes
862
Greek/Roman theek hai, rest of those are all thrash tier tribes
I have read somewhere sir that despite calling Greeks Mlecchas, our ancestors held them in high regard for their scientific temper within spheres like Astronomy, Math etc. We honoured wise men whosoever it might be, whilst keeping our distance from non-dharmics. Thats how civilisations thrived.

Romans, well, Greeks have a different view altogether about them. Atleast Greeks resisted and tried to protect their traditions. Romans dropped their pants the moment some 'council' declared a Messaih rose in the Levant. Constantine got his item raja to market and run a fighting empire. Greeks resisted well by all accounts, but alas!
 

shade

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Messages
7,425
Likes
40,602
Country flag
I have read somewhere sir that despite calling Greeks Mlecchas, our ancestors held them in high regard for their scientific temper within spheres like Astronomy, Math etc. We honoured wise men whosoever it might be, whilst keeping our distance from non-dharmics. Thats how civilisations thrived.

Romans, well, Greeks have a different view altogether about them. Atleast Greeks resisted and tried to protect their traditions. Romans dropped their pants the moment some 'council' declared a Messaih rose in the Levant. Constantine got his item raja to market and run a fighting empire. Greeks resisted well by all accounts, but alas!
Yavans were the early Christians, early Missionary activity took place in the "Hellenosphere"/eastern Mediterranean, Roman empire proper got converted later.

Such was the fervor of the Yavans that they stopped referring to themselves as "Hellenes" i.e the word in their language for "Greeks" since it was also used as a word for their Pagan fellows but instead by "Romanoi".
The Romanoi self-nomenclature became entrenched during the "Eastern Roman Empire" phase of theirs

Ofc language, culture, traditions remained the same, also why they survived inspite of 400 years of Ottoman Muslim rule when the 'minority rule' of Romans failed and were replaced by "spiritual successors" consisting of Germanics, Latinized Celtics and Slavs.

btw Romans are a little tribe that copy pasted a lot of Yavan things including their gods, it just so happens that they were more competent than the Yavans in warfare and managing large empires.
Yavans have high survivability though, just like us, the chings, the persians.
 

Stalingrad

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2020
Messages
153
Likes
862
Yavans were the early Christians, early Missionary activity took place in the "Hellenosphere"/eastern Mediterranean, Roman empire proper got converted later.

Such was the fervor of the Yavans that they stopped referring to themselves as "Hellenes" i.e the word in their language for "Greeks" since it was also used as a word for their Pagan fellows but instead by "Romanoi".
The Romanoi self-nomenclature became entrenched during the "Eastern Roman Empire" phase of theirs

Ofc language, culture, traditions remained the same, also why they survived inspite of 400 years of Ottoman Muslim rule when the 'minority rule' of Romans failed and were replaced by "spiritual successors" consisting of Germanics, Latinized Celtics and Slavs.

btw Romans are a little tribe that copy pasted a lot of Yavan things including their gods, it just so happens that they were more competent than the Yavans in warfare and managing large empires.
Yavans have high survivability though, just like us, the chings, the persians.
That is true sir ,but the Romans were converted en masse after Constantine's notorious Milan Edict in 3rd cen A.D, while there have been Christian converts in Greece before that, they are a minority limited to certain pockets along the Aegean. They managed to gain depth within, and despute having a headstart of a Century, the whole of Greece got Christianized only by the end of 4th cen A.D. Even then there were cases of torture of what were called 'pagans' by the royalty in Athens and Thessaloniki and other cities. My point is that Greeks were more civilised than Romans who were mere sidekicks of Greek monarchies and are similar to chappalchors outside temples, copying and altering everything Greek.
 

Maharaj samudragupt

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2020
Messages
4,045
Likes
9,567
Country flag
Yavans were the early Christians, early Missionary activity took place in the "Hellenosphere"/eastern Mediterranean, Roman empire proper got converted later.

Such was the fervor of the Yavans that they stopped referring to themselves as "Hellenes" i.e the word in their language for "Greeks" since it was also used as a word for their Pagan fellows but instead by "Romanoi".
The Romanoi self-nomenclature became entrenched during the "Eastern Roman Empire" phase of theirs

Ofc language, culture, traditions remained the same, also why they survived inspite of 400 years of Ottoman Muslim rule when the 'minority rule' of Romans failed and were replaced by "spiritual successors" consisting of Germanics, Latinized Celtics and Slavs.

btw Romans are a little tribe that copy pasted a lot of Yavan things including their gods, it just so happens that they were more competent than the Yavans in warfare and managing large empires.
Yavans have high survivability though, just like us, the chings, the persians.
Who were these nestorian christians ?
Found in eron and even uttar bharat too ?
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
3,691
Likes
20,012
Country flag
Hello everyone what the fck is this porky saying

View attachment 88390
Pls dont spam this thread with peeee d fus horseshit.

How damn ironic when the same half dyks keep doing randi rona about 'islamophobic' western academia prejudice but in this case they quickly suck up to these coomers.

They usually refer to that research posted by david cuck and his meth ridden ******s regarding alleged R1a Z93 hg expansion . Coomer took dna samples of some 35 Gujratis and Punjabis few Gorkhas from Nepal and few porkys from abroad. And they claim this is representatives of all of Bharat lmfao. How could only 35 samples ever represent all of Bharat that is over 1.3 billion population ? They dont. Infact Bharat comprises one of the largest ethnic populations with enormous cultural, morphological and genetic diversities only next to Africa.

And neither they comprehensively represent SARASVATI SINDHU civilization that supported 50 lakhs population.

What they hide is R1a-Z93 is BHARTIYA origin that originated in Bharat 15.5k years ago. So, any population expansion of this haplotype only proves that BHARTIYA intermingled with other BHARTIYAS and produced lots of babies . Out of all the population groups studied from all over the world, Punjab showed the highest frequency of snp variations.The time line of the genetics of the population is given by the snp (single nucleotide polymorphism) of the R1a1a alleles. Punjab is in BHARAT.

That being said the most recent common ancestor among us and R1a-Z93 is detected in Punjab in BHARAT.

For your kind information , Saharia tribes from Madhya Pradesh showed the presence of R1a1* with high diversity and percentage negating any outside influx.

Similar observations were made in the Chenchu tribe of Andhra Pradesh And neither of those are Brahmins yet still much much higher than eurofags lmao.
 
Last edited:

VikingGod

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2021
Messages
22
Likes
61
Country flag
I think Whole genetic discussion is Stupid , India has lot of mixing . When they claim "Aryan Invasion" they claim Vedic culture . So they need to show Vedic culture originated Outside India .

There is zero evidence of Vedic culture origin outside India , this theory cant even meet basic eligibility of Origin . Vedic text despise western people "Yavans" , If their ancestors came from outside why they despised them ? They mention nothing about outside .

Its like saying Egyptians originated in India , vanished from India without trace & Built Pyramids in Egypt :rofl::pound:
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
3,691
Likes
20,012
Country flag
I think Whole genetic discussion is Stupid , India has lot of mixing . When they claim "Aryan Invasion" they claim Vedic culture . So they need to show Vedic culture originated Outside India .

There is zero evidence of Vedic culture origin outside India , this theory cant even meet basic eligibility of Origin . Vedic text despise western people "Yavans" , If their ancestors came from outside why they despised them ? They mention nothing about outside .

Its like saying Egyptians originated in India , vanished from India without trace & Built Pyramids in Egypt :rofl::pound:
Remember how chutiya half assed hollywood fake propaganda about Egyptians being civilized by a bunch of genderless anglo saxon coomers? Egyptian lower class citizen or Egyptian thief roles are often given to arabs actors or so in an attempt to cum wash the great Egyptian legacy.

When the truth being from Egyptian arts, we know that people were depicted with reddish, olive, or yellow skin tones. The Sphinx has been described as having Nubian or sub-Saharan features.

Later on , Egypt was invaded and conquered by different groups of people, like the Nubians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, and Macedonian Greeks. Taking dna from Egyptians during the height of these invasions is fruitless.

And from literature, Greek writers like Herodotus and Aristotle referred to Egyptians as having dark skin or Yellow Skin. Even Sumerians called themselves black headed people . Sumerians were advanced civilization tbh.
 

omaebakabaka

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
2,050
Likes
4,565
I think Whole genetic discussion is Stupid , India has lot of mixing . When they claim "Aryan Invasion" they claim Vedic culture . So they need to show Vedic culture originated Outside India .

There is zero evidence of Vedic culture origin outside India , this theory cant even meet basic eligibility of Origin . Vedic text despise western people "Yavans" , If their ancestors came from outside why they despised them ? They mention nothing about outside .

Its like saying Egyptians originated in India , vanished from India without trace & Built Pyramids in Egypt :rofl::pound:
Only some chutiya north-western elitists mostly Punjabi ones think that they have different genes....bullsheeet....an then India bikari nikamma academics in the west propagate this also....they also sell their mothers and daughters for some green card or to asslickk goras
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
3,691
Likes
20,012
Country flag
Contamination of dna is very frequent in collecting such thousand years old samples .

There are 3000-4000+ sites awaiting to be excavated in BHARAT.

Carbon dating on excavated chariots has already confirmed presence of horses.

We wait for the full archaeological report that is to be published eventually.

The OCP is a 4000 bce plus to 2000 bce Bronze Age culture of the Indo-Gangetic plain. It was a contemporary neighbour of the Sindhu-Saraswati civilisation.

Infact Archaeological Survey of Bharat Confirms Ocp culture had a “local beginning” that would go back to 9,000-10,000 years before present. What is startling is the impressions of cloth found on bodies that suggests purification of bodies similar to what we practice in Hindu DHARMA. Ocp infact got its horses from Tibet.The shortest path from Tibet to BHARAT is through the gorges of Trans-Himalayan Rivers and different passes. This route is roughly 150 km long only. G R Sharma et al found horse bones at Mahagara (near Allahabad) whose “six sample absolute carbon 14 tests have given dates of 2250 bce approx.

Atleast we dont spoof samples with fucktarded cgi scripts to use it as proxies against unobtainable or contaminated dna which is widely practiced in subhuman eurofagian academia by its school yard outcasts.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top