"Are (Modi's) India and (Sharif's) Pakistan Sliding Toward War?" -- Let's Hope Not

tsunami

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
1,797
Likes
6,309
Country flag


John Stimson warns in a detailed, factual article—“Are India and Pakistan Sliding Toward War?” — that rising tensions over Kashmir – and poor relations between Modi and Pakistan – could lead soon to war. I don’t disagree with the points he assembles. Kashmir is always a tinderbox, and right now, is indeed alarming. India and Pakistan have fought four wars since Independence. Terrorist groups, some with ties to Pakistan’s strong ISI, can provoke confrontations. The Subcontinent always seems on edge.

However, here are four points to suggest relations between India and Pakistan may get worse but not reach actual head-on full-scale combat between regular armed forces.



1. Modi will hopefully be a calming influence. It is true that he leads the BJP, which is not overly friendly toward Pakistan. But as the old saying goes, “war stifles reform.” If India gets distracted by war, it will stifle his program of forcing through tough economic reforms. That program means far more to him and his party’s future than posturing with Pakistan.

2. Each country has a good military reason not to fight. The Indian military weaponry is, frankly, backward. India has been on a shopping spree of foreign arms purchases. But it still has a long way to escape its situation after the Mumbai terror attack by terrorists from Pakistani-supported groups, when India’s land forces were simply not in shape to strike back.

3. Pakistan has an internal war against militants, especially the Pakistan Taliban. The war is long past the point of full hostilities. Pakistan’s armed forces would face a two-front war if they took on India. (It must be admitted, though, that it is never far from the minds of the Pakistani military that they might fight with India, and so they are probably ready to cope with India.)

4. Other powers will pour oil on trouble waters. The United States has been trying to work with Pakistan about several vital issues, especially Afghanistan; at the same time, the United States is trying to form a low-key alliance with Modi against resurgent China. So the United States will try to cool down both sides. (In a prev’ ious article, though, I did suggest that the United States’ sharing of military and nuclear technology with India might rile Pakistan.) China is Pakistan’s ally, but it does not want to be India’s enemy, nor would it want a defeat to destabilize Pakistan. So China will not be an opponent of peace.

So: while war is definitely something to worry about, hope for peace

http://www.forbes.com/sites/charles...fs-pakistan-sliding-toward-war-lets-hope-not/
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,157
Likes
12,188
War pakis can't afford politically economically and diplomatically and last but the least military
 

punjab47

महाबलामहावीर्यामहासत्यपराक्रमासर्वाग्रेक्षत्रियाजट
Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,059
Likes
593
We've been at war, since Muhammad said he dreamed of one day ruling Hind.

I don't see, what's new..
 

rohit.gr77

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Messages
135
Likes
117
War even if it happens would as always be started by the Porkies trying to show off their Mard E Mommingiri. :hehe:
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
20,846
Likes
81,841
Country flag
India pakistan have been at war since 1947, Let's not make any mistake about it. Pakistan cannot afford a war. Political leadership of both countries has nothing to do with war, It's their military that we need to worry about.
 

GokuInd

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
174
Likes
41
[...]
1. Modi will hopefully be a calming influence. It is true that he leads the BJP, which is not overly friendly toward Pakistan. But as the old saying goes, “war stifles reform.” If India gets distracted by war, it will stifle his program of forcing through tough economic reforms. That program means far more to him and his party’s future than posturing with Pakistan.

2. Each country has a good military reason not to fight. The Indian military weaponry is, frankly, backward. India has been on a shopping spree of foreign arms purchases. But it still has a long way to escape its situation after the Mumbai terror attack by terrorists from Pakistani-supported groups, when India’s land forces were simply not in shape to strike back.

3. Pakistan has an internal war against militants, especially the Pakistan Taliban. The war is long past the point of full hostilities. Pakistan’s armed forces would face a two-front war if they took on India. (It must be admitted, though, that it is never far from the minds of the Pakistani military that they might fight with India, and so they are probably ready to cope with India.)

4. Other powers will pour oil on trouble waters. The United States has been trying to work with Pakistan about several vital issues, especially Afghanistan; at the same time, the United States is trying to form a low-key alliance with Modi against resurgent China. So the United States will try to cool down both sides. (In a prev’ ious article, though, I did suggest that the United States’ sharing of military and nuclear technology with India might rile Pakistan.) China is Pakistan’s ally, but it does not want to be India’s enemy, nor would it want a defeat to destabilize Pakistan. So China will not be an opponent of peace.

So: while war is definitely something to worry about, hope for peace

http://www.forbes.com/sites/charles...fs-pakistan-sliding-toward-war-lets-hope-not/
This article reeks of parochial US paternalism. Just what my gut says after scanning this piece. Nothing special.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top