Better ask them to update 2200 kg thing. They have mixed up the weight of warhead with the whole missile.Please update the 8 tonn thing. Its impossible and people will laugh at us.
A3 carries a warhead of 2 tons. So an IRBM that carries a 2 ton warhead can't be of 8ton gross weight. So the report of 8 ton A3 is highly unrealistic.The weight reduction may possibly be from going from being a liquid fuelled missile to a solid fuelled missile?? Liquid fuelled missiles tend to be a lot heavier. But this is not the first solid fuelled AGNI so there could be an error?
Makes sense ! You might be right ! Major achievement I must say!I think DRDO folks might have said that "8 tons of weight have been reduced" and over exicited jurno took it as "reduced to 8 tons".
If rumors are true, High Nitrogen steel & aluminum alloy wheels to be used in MK2 to reduce 6 to 8 tons of weight. But that is a whole different story and I'd like you to go through mk2 thread.Sounds too good to be true, but remarkable achievement even if weight could have been reduced by 8 tons. Somebody try this remedy on fat kid Arjun also
That would be a logical conclusion, but what about the payload? Can the new missile still carry the same payload, or will it need additional fuel, thereby offsetting some of the weight reduction?If there was any weight reduction it would significantly increase missile range