- Joined
- Oct 28, 2016
- Messages
- 1,636
- Likes
- 1,464
when isi find it difficult to control from outside....so this time they decided to get in...
.......................................
when isi find it difficult to control from outside....so this time they decided to get in...
.......................................
indian oppose isi...Seems like a lot of Nawaz Sharif (PML-N) supporters on this forum.
Nobody have any sympathy for N. Sarif or xyz in Terroristan. People are talking about the way Terroristan rough army meddling election, to get its favorite boot liker to gain the power.Seems like a lot of Nawaz Sharif (PML-N) supporters on this forum. Didn't the Kargil War happen under his watch as Prime Minister in 1999?
That's not true, afterwards he also supported rough army's action. He would have taken full credit if rough army would have succeeded in '99.I suspect Sharif didn't have much to do with Kargil,either in the planning or the decision to go through with this little military adventure. Still,it just solidifies what a lot of us think- that when it comes to Pakistan;s foreign affairs or military -things that that directly effect India- the Pakistan PM is not allowed to be more than a figurehead.
credit rahem khan..... .............AFAIK he is struggling to form government and In my opinion his government will fall before time leading to anarchy and re elections.
Stop right there. How do you arrive at this claim that "Most Indian support Nawaz"??Most Indians support Nawaz...
modi made a call to Suleiman....he expected me to treat him like he was god. In fact, he even called himself Suleiman the Magnificent (Ottoman sultan)
Taliban playboy khan will have to prove that he is a true terrorists at heart and theISI were ALWAYS on the in. Fauj and ISI own and run Shitistan. With IK, they found a good way to send multiple messages within and beyond Shitistan.
1. The message conveyed overseas is that Fauj and ISI are the be-all-end-all when it comes to Shitistan and if the foreign powers wish to do any business with Shitistan, they have no choice but to go via Fauj and ISI. The civvies are powerless and can be changed at Fauj's whim.
2. Within Shitistan the message is that siyasatdaan is as "powerful and influential" as the fauj allows them to be. Once they accept this and do not suffers from delusions of grandeur, it will be fine. The fauj and only the fauj reserves the right to harbour delusions of grandeur. Siyasatdaan are free to loot, khasot, kill, maim and f**k as long as the fauj gets the first cut of every deal and more importantly fauji dealings are completely off limits- no civvie oversight.
3. To India- There's no Shitistan without fauj and there will be no difference in ground situation, so better brace up for more terror attacks. We will do everything in our power to make you jeena haraam.
isi and Judiciary working hand in hand....and seem to watch bollywood movies a lot....some time they throw phones and sometimes currency notes....Judiciary is the last thing any govt wants to fuck with.
If Judiciary looses faith, then there is nothing else to have faith in.....
Good progress, I wish @Neo @Zarvan and your country men to loose faith in Judiciary as soon as possible. As long as you have aitami bum and you're aitami quvvat, you need nothing more.
As the great PM of Pakistan Zulfiqar once said " Pakistan will eat grass, but will get the atom bomb". And you showed gratitude by killing his daughter....Nice...She also happens to be ex-prime minister, right!? Pakis have their own way of showing gratitude. Some say Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan was also assassinated, is that true!?
Surprised washington post isn't being an Islamist shill and actually telling the truth about something.Taliban khan supports disgusting Blasphemy law .... porkis uses it to kill Ahmadis,Shias,Sufis and all other minorities through this law.
Like our kejruddin
A ‘hybrid state’
The recent election in Pakistan suggests a more sophisticated system — referred to as a ‘hybrid state’ — has come into being whereby the military establishment, acutely conscious of the costs of martial rule, has promoted an alternative framework so that there is a ‘buffer’ between the army and society. The recurring backlash and legitimate grievances of the people are borne by expendable politicians absolving the real authority behind the scene from any responsibility for governance and developmental failures. The political parties and civilian elite seem to have embraced their role in this metamorphosis of Pakistan’s “managed” or “guided” democracy.